1. Joined
    27 Feb '13
    Moves
    653
    08 Apr '13 23:02
    I will give 1.5-1 for anyone who thinks the Rams will have a better record than the Seahawks. I will give the same 1.5-1 regarding the same bet Rams Vs. 49ers.

    I will give 5-1 to anyone who thinks Rams will outright win the division.
  2. Joined
    09 Nov '12
    Moves
    1810
    09 Apr '13 14:18
    Originally posted by Fright
    I will give 1.5-1 for anyone who thinks the Rams will have a better record than the Seahawks. I will give the same 1.5-1 regarding the same bet Rams Vs. 49ers.

    I will give 5-1 to anyone who thinks Rams will outright win the division.
    5:1 are not even decent odds. 10:1 and I might consider it.
  3. Joined
    10 May '09
    Moves
    13341
    09 Apr '13 15:10
    Originally posted by Zamboner
    5:1 are not even decent odds. 10:1 and I might consider it.
    Yep. 1:4 odds would mean all the teams have equal chances.
  4. Joined
    27 Feb '13
    Moves
    653
    09 Apr '13 22:231 edit
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    Yep. 1:4 odds would mean all the teams have equal chances.
    1/4 (1 in 4) would be equal chances (25% ). 1:4 (1 to 4) would be 20% as its 1 for you and 4 against you.

    http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/25/probability/does-4-1-odds-mean-you-have-25-20-chance-win-260178/
  5. Joined
    10 May '09
    Moves
    13341
    09 Apr '13 22:32
    Originally posted by Fright
    1/4 (1 in 4) would be equal chances (25% ). 1:4 (1 to 4) would be 20% as its 1 for you and 4 against you.

    http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/25/probability/does-4-1-odds-mean-you-have-25-20-chance-win-260178/
    I'm not familiar with proper annotations when it comes to betting odds. I'm pretty sure you know I meant 4 to 1 odds.
  6. Joined
    27 Feb '13
    Moves
    653
    09 Apr '13 23:19
    yeah the phrasing gets confusing. the rams at random are 1/4 of the division but when you flip to the ":" or "to" format it would be 3:1 as 49ers+hawks+cards(3) : rams(1). . . so if you start it as a fraction you'd have to take 1 value out of the denominator side. (as the base in question leaves the groupings in a vs. format)

    In a game like poker if you have to calculate pot odds vs. actual value very fast and you forget do change the denominator(when comparing the numbers) you can get screwed... Ive done it a few times.
  7. Joined
    27 Feb '13
    Moves
    653
    10 Apr '13 01:24
    if something is truly random then the sum of all the possible outcomes should = 0 for the ratio to be correct.

    3:1 would be +300 rams, -100 49er, -100 hawk, -100 cards.. +300- 300= 0


    The funny thing is one time my friend and I were bored so I offered to play a single dice (die?) game where I get 6:1 every time it lands on a 1. 😛 The expected value is +18cents for every dollar bet.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree