05 Jan '07 08:58>
It seems like many people have written them off as contenders this year. Why?
Originally posted by RamnedWow, I just checked their schedule, and just... wow.
laugh at them. they suck. 9-7? over the NFC WEST ??
OUT.
Originally posted by lioyankI've followed the Seahawks all season, and injuries has really been their downfall. We lost Alexander early for six weeks. We lost Hasslebeck for four weeks. Jeremy Stevens (our starting TE and a very important piece of our West Coast offense) was out six weeks. Darrell Jackson (our 1st receiver) has been out 3 weeks. Bobby Engram (our 2nd receiver) was out 9 weeks. During this last game in Tampa Bay the announcers pointed out that our five main offensive guys from last season have not played in the same game together all season.
Wow, I just checked their schedule, and just... wow.
I knew that they lost a couple of games to easy teams (as I mentioned in another thread already) but now, after looking at their full schedule, how is this team not at LEAST 11-5?!?!
1 game vs. Detroit (barely won by a field goal, lol)
2 games vs. Arizona (1-1)
2 games vs. St. Louis (squeaked out a San Fran...
Christ Almighty, I just might end up placing a bet on those Cowboys afterall...
Originally posted by telerionGood points. As the Steelers proved last year, the regular season record does not determine how you do in the playoffs. The Seahawks are still the reigning NFC champions, and with the addition of Branch (at least when he holds onto the ball), their offense looks even better than last year now that they're mostly healthy. (I see Womack is listed as "questionable" - any chance he'll play tomorrow?)
I've followed the Seahawks all season, and injuries has really been their downfall. We lost Alexander early for six weeks. We lost Hasslebeck for four weeks. Jeremy Stevens (our starting TE and a very important piece of our West Coast offense) was out six weeks. Darrell Jackson (our 1st receiver) has been out 3 weeks. Bobby Engram (our 2nd receiver) wa ...[text shortened]... ld have gelled, I'd guess we'd have won at least 11 and probably 12 or even 13 games.
Originally posted by teleriondreadful, how they barely topped St. Louis. Think. Where would Seattle be if kicker missed a FG? Hmm..1st team to be eliminated? There you have it, the Seattle Seahawks.
I've followed the Seahawks all season, and injuries has really been their downfall. We lost Alexander early for six weeks. We lost Hasslebeck for four weeks. Jeremy Stevens (our starting TE and a very important piece of our West Coast offense) was out six weeks. Darrell Jackson (our 1st receiver) has been out 3 weeks. Bobby Engram (our 2nd receiver) wa ld have gelled, I'd guess we'd have won at least 11 and probably 12 or even 13 games.
Originally posted by RamnedStill bitter that your team is second in the lowly NFC West? Maybe if your guys hadn't sucked, it wouldn't have come down to FG's.
dreadful, how they barely topped St. Louis. Think. Where would Seattle be if kicker missed a FG? Hmm..1st team to be eliminated? There you have it, the Seattle Seahawks.
Not NFC champs for long, graciously.
Originally posted by richjohnsonThe condition of Pork Chop is a big concern for me. This is especially so given that Chris Gray (our other starting guard) missed the last game due to injury. We do have a promising rookie, Rob Sims from Ohio State that has filled in at times during the season, but I'd be a lot happier with Womack as long as his injury won't be a liability.
Good points. As the Steelers proved last year, the regular season record does not determine how you do in the playoffs. The Seahawks are still the reigning NFC champions, and with the addition of Branch (at least when he holds onto the ball), their offense looks even better than last year now that they're mostly healthy. (I see Womack is listed as "questionable" - any chance he'll play tomorrow?)
Originally posted by telerion"lowly?"
Still bitter that your team is second in the lowly NFC West? Maybe if your guys hadn't sucked, it wouldn't have come down to FG's.
Heck you are lucky you weren't third.
Originally posted by RamnedYou said Dallas was going to "win convincingly" over the Seahawks. Your predictive powers seem a bit suspect.
"lowly?"
So much for rising as you said earlier.
And the Rams? I'd say it's a good start with all the moves they had made.
If your guys hadn't sucked, I suppose the 49ers (ah ha ha) wouldn't have swept you? Heck you were lucky you weren't 3rd, only 6 points away.
Too bad Seattle is going to get malled by the Bears, like they did eariler. Not much point for a mediocre team to make the playoffs, is there?
Originally posted by RamnedThat was way back on 1 Oct, and was the 'hawks 1st game without Alexander. However, even with Alexandre back if Hasselbeck plays that poorly again then Seattle will probably lose. But lately Grossman has not been very good - I'm guessing this game will come down to which team makes fewer turnovers (as usual).
Too bad Seattle is going to get malled by the Bears, like they did eariler. Not much point for a mediocre team to make the playoffs, is there?