Sheff.utd.?now its embarrasing

Originally posted by Angry Boy
1. Read post carefully
2. Think before you answer

I said "Fielding an ineligible player is in nearly all cases a points deduction". I did not use the word "indicate" nor have I said that the EPL could not issue whatever punishemnt they wish.

Fielding ineligible players brings a three-point deduction per game throughout the English leagues almost wit ...[text shortened]... st Ham, I'm just wondering why the EPL haven't shown consistency in the matter.

yes, okay, i did re-read your post and take into account what you said; i think we're both agreeing on the same point here - there is not a rule in place that says a point deduction must be issued but - like we both have said - by not doing so lacks consistency from the epl...

the epl would never backtrack though surely, i cant even recall one decision where the fa or the epl have ever backtracked on a decision... in fact, i dont think fifa have ever backtracked either... as far as i know

also, liverpool played Mascherano who west ham should never have sold because they never owned him... shouldn't they be fined as well?

Originally posted by eatmybishop
yes, okay, i did re-read your post and take into account what you said; i think we're both agreeing on the same point here - there is not a rule in place that says a point deduction must be issued but - like we both have said - by not doing so lacks consistency from the epl...

the epl would never backtrack though surely, i cant even recall one decisio ...[text shortened]... ed on a decision... in fact, i dont think fifa have ever backtracked either... as far as i know

I can't see them backing down either. As for Mascherano, it doesn't matter who he belonged to when LFC bought him as long as they and not the dodgy company own him now.

The hearing is a week on Monday... let's see what happens then eh?
I believe we'll be having the same discussions though....

Originally posted by blade68
The hearing is a week on Monday... let's see what happens then eh?
I believe we'll be having the same discussions though....

You couldn't make it up with you lot could ya, talk about save our blunts, why don't you try and get president Bushs' signature while your recruiting just about everyone on this planet to save your status....

Originally posted by Angry Boy
I'm not supporting SW's cause or anti West Ham, I'm just wondering why the EPL haven't shown consistency in the matter.

Perhaps there is more money coming in if a club like West Ham stay in the Premiership? London derbies and all.

Originally posted by asromacalcio
Perhaps there is more money coming in if a club like West Ham stay in the Premiership? London derbies and all.

There's no substance in that.

Sheffield United sold all their ticket allocations for last season, and most home games were capacity attendances as well.

Originally posted by blade68
There's no substance in that.

Sheffield United sold all their ticket allocations for last season, and most home games were capacity attendances as well.

How can they have been capacity atts? you didn't get 33k every match, or whatever bummhole lane holds.

Originally posted by tawnyowl
How can they have been capacity atts? you didn't get 33k every match, or whatever bummhole lane holds.

What do you think I meant by the word 'most'?

Get a dictionary you muppet.

Originally posted by blade68
What do you think I meant by the word 'most'?

Get a dictionary you muppet.

Can't remember "MOST" home games being capacity, except when all your glory hunters turned up for man.u chelski etc