Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Sports Forum

Sports Forum

  1. Standard member Ramned
    The Rams
    29 Nov '06 17:27
    Marc Bulger up on top. No doubt, unquestioned.

    1. Bulger
    2. Manning (P)
    3. McNabb
    4. Brees
    5. Brady - ha, 3 SB rings, yeah, who cares?
  2. 29 Nov '06 17:31
    1. P. Manning
    2. The Rest
  3. Standard member Natural Science
    blunderer of pawns
    29 Nov '06 18:52
    Originally posted by Ramned

    5. Brady - ha, 3 SB rings, yeah, who cares?
    I hope you're joking.
  4. Standard member Phlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    29 Nov '06 19:21
    Originally posted by Ramned
    Marc Bulger up on top. No doubt, unquestioned.

    1. Bulger
    2. Manning (P)
    3. McNabb
    4. Brees
    5. Brady - ha, 3 SB rings, yeah, who cares?
    You have Brady at 5... please tell me the Super Stars that make him look good? Please do so now.

    P-
  5. 29 Nov '06 20:04
    Tom Brady is the best! And hes from Michigan! No wonder he has 3 Superbowl rings!
  6. Standard member Ramned
    The Rams
    29 Nov '06 20:36 / 2 edits
    1. Bulger is better than Brady.
    2. Bill Belichick is better than Tom Brady.
    3. Brady's Superbowl rings cost him $2.
    4. Defense wins championships, not Tom Brady's.
    5. Excuse me, but, how is he doing presently? Oh yeah, that's right, he sucks.
    7. Anyways, thinking on the past, Brett Farve is better.
    8. Yeah, he's from Michigan. That's good. Did he play starter for them? No, because he sucked.

    Speaking and Phlabby's complaint, you're right. We'll move him, realistically, to...let's see, Vick's better, Hasselbeck, hmm...Delhomme, Ladanian Tomlinson...I'll shove him aside to 10th.

    Oh, and my new #5 passer is LT - I mean, c'mon, he throws TDs, he catches TDs, he runs TDs...bow before our MVP, everyone.
  7. 29 Nov '06 21:04
    Originally posted by Ramned
    Marc Bulger up on top. No doubt, unquestioned.

    1. Bulger
    2. Manning (P)
    3. McNabb
    4. Brees
    5. Brady - ha, 3 SB rings, yeah, who cares?
    1. Brady - The man wins, thats all that counts.
    2. P. Manning - He only wins all the ones that don't count.
    3. Everyone else
  8. 29 Nov '06 21:06 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Ramned
    1. Bulger is better than Brady.
    2. Bill Belichick is better than Tom Brady.
    3. Brady's Superbowl rings cost him $2.
    4. Defense wins championships, not Tom Brady's.
    5. Excuse me, but, how is he doing presently? Oh yeah, that's right, he sucks.
    7. Anyways, thinking on the past, Brett Farve is better.
    8. Yeah, he's from Michigan. That's good. Did he play n, c'mon, he throws TDs, he catches TDs, he runs TDs...bow before our MVP, everyone.
    Yea you're right 9-3 sucks. I totally expected better from him.
  9. Standard member Ramned
    The Rams
    29 Nov '06 21:16
    Originally posted by zebano
    1. Brady - The man wins, thats all that counts.
    2. P. Manning - He only wins all the ones that don't count.
    3. Everyone else
    oh really??

    Ok, let us rank Jake Plummer, the backup to rookie Cutler, up there as well. As you said, QBs are to be judged on winning. Jake Plummer wins, and that's all that counts
    Yeah, you make alot of sense.
  10. Standard member Phlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    29 Nov '06 21:19
    Originally posted by Ramned
    oh really??

    Ok, let us rank Jake Plummer, the backup to rookie Cutler, up there as well. As you said, QBs are to be judged on winning. Jake Plummer wins, and that's all that counts
    Yeah, you make alot of sense.
    I'm getting mad with you!



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ufwukWgKfI

    P-
  11. Standard member Ramned
    The Rams
    29 Nov '06 21:19
    Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
    Yea you're right 9-3 sucks. I totally expected better from him.
    yeah, good thing they have a defense that works. Otherwise, they would be mediocre.
  12. Standard member Natural Science
    blunderer of pawns
    29 Nov '06 21:26
    Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
    Yea you're right 9-3 sucks. I totally expected better from him.
    Let's don't jump ahead of ourselves. They're 8-3 right now. And let's face it, Detroit can be, well.....you know, on any given Sunday, they could...

    Alright, Tom Brady, soon to be 9-3.
  13. Standard member Ramned
    The Rams
    29 Nov '06 21:28
    Originally posted by Natural Science
    Let's don't jump ahead of ourselves. They're 8-3 right now. And let's face it, Detroit can be, well.....you know, on any given Sunday, they could...

    Alright, Tom Brady, soon to be 9-3.
    no, they are 9-3.
  14. Standard member Natural Science
    blunderer of pawns
    29 Nov '06 21:37
    Originally posted by Ramned
    no, they are 9-3.
    No they are not. No team has played 12 games yet. And this will be my last post on the matter, as I highly suspect that your whole motivation for starting this thread in the first place, was just to get a rise out of someone. I will not take the bait.
  15. Standard member Ramned
    The Rams
    29 Nov '06 21:38
    oh yeah, i just checked.