Go back
The Best Quarterback in the NFL

The Best Quarterback in the NFL

Sports

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Marc Bulger up on top. No doubt, unquestioned.

1. Bulger
2. Manning (P)
3. McNabb
4. Brees
5. Brady - ha, 3 SB rings, yeah, who cares?

d

Joined
05 Jan 04
Moves
45179
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

1. P. Manning
2. The Rest

NS
blunderer of pawns

Rhode (not an)Island

Joined
17 Apr 04
Moves
24785
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned

5. Brady - ha, 3 SB rings, yeah, who cares?
I hope you're joking.

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
Marc Bulger up on top. No doubt, unquestioned.

1. Bulger
2. Manning (P)
3. McNabb
4. Brees
5. Brady - ha, 3 SB rings, yeah, who cares?
You have Brady at 5... please tell me the Super Stars that make him look good? Please do so now.

P-

FL

over there

Joined
12 Sep 06
Moves
749
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Tom Brady is the best! And hes from Michigan! No wonder he has 3 Superbowl rings!

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
29 Nov 06
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

1. Bulger is better than Brady.
2. Bill Belichick is better than Tom Brady.
3. Brady's Superbowl rings cost him $2.
4. Defense wins championships, not Tom Brady's.
5. Excuse me, but, how is he doing presently? Oh yeah, that's right, he sucks.
7. Anyways, thinking on the past, Brett Farve is better.
8. Yeah, he's from Michigan. That's good. Did he play starter for them? No, because he sucked.

Speaking and Phlabby's complaint, you're right. We'll move him, realistically, to...let's see, Vick's better, Hasselbeck, hmm...Delhomme, Ladanian Tomlinson...I'll shove him aside to 10th.

Oh, and my new #5 passer is LT - I mean, c'mon, he throws TDs, he catches TDs, he runs TDs...bow before our MVP, everyone.

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
Marc Bulger up on top. No doubt, unquestioned.

1. Bulger
2. Manning (P)
3. McNabb
4. Brees
5. Brady - ha, 3 SB rings, yeah, who cares?
1. Brady - The man wins, thats all that counts.
2. P. Manning - He only wins all the ones that don't count.
3. Everyone else

FL

over there

Joined
12 Sep 06
Moves
749
Clock
29 Nov 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
1. Bulger is better than Brady.
2. Bill Belichick is better than Tom Brady.
3. Brady's Superbowl rings cost him $2.
4. Defense wins championships, not Tom Brady's.
5. Excuse me, but, how is he doing presently? Oh yeah, that's right, he sucks.
7. Anyways, thinking on the past, Brett Farve is better.
8. Yeah, he's from Michigan. That's good. Did he play n, c'mon, he throws TDs, he catches TDs, he runs TDs...bow before our MVP, everyone.
Yea you're right 9-3 sucks. I totally expected better from him.

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
1. Brady - The man wins, thats all that counts.
2. P. Manning - He only wins all the ones that don't count.
3. Everyone else
oh really??

Ok, let us rank Jake Plummer, the backup to rookie Cutler, up there as well. As you said, QBs are to be judged on winning. Jake Plummer wins, and that's all that counts
Yeah, you make alot of sense.

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
oh really??

Ok, let us rank Jake Plummer, the backup to rookie Cutler, up there as well. As you said, QBs are to be judged on winning. Jake Plummer wins, and that's all that counts
Yeah, you make alot of sense.
I'm getting mad with you!

😠



P-

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
Yea you're right 9-3 sucks. I totally expected better from him.
yeah, good thing they have a defense that works. Otherwise, they would be mediocre.

NS
blunderer of pawns

Rhode (not an)Island

Joined
17 Apr 04
Moves
24785
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
Yea you're right 9-3 sucks. I totally expected better from him.
Let's don't jump ahead of ourselves. They're 8-3 right now. And let's face it, Detroit can be, well.....you know, on any given Sunday, they could...

Alright, Tom Brady, soon to be 9-3.

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Natural Science
Let's don't jump ahead of ourselves. They're 8-3 right now. And let's face it, Detroit can be, well.....you know, on any given Sunday, they could...

Alright, Tom Brady, soon to be 9-3.
no, they are 9-3.

NS
blunderer of pawns

Rhode (not an)Island

Joined
17 Apr 04
Moves
24785
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
no, they are 9-3.
No they are not. No team has played 12 games yet. And this will be my last post on the matter, as I highly suspect that your whole motivation for starting this thread in the first place, was just to get a rise out of someone. I will not take the bait.

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

oh yeah, i just checked. 😳

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.