Tournaments Forum

Tournaments Forum

  1. Joined
    14 Jul '06
    Moves
    20541
    09 Sep '08 16:36
    Why not invite all the 3.b guys (cludi, seadevil, clivestraddle, stephane, ironman31 etc) back to compete in a "silicon frenzy" event to see who has the biggest cress patch?
    The games should be interesting affairs.
    They would only be eligible to play in the engine tourni & nowhere else on the site.

    How about it?
  2. Joined
    14 Jul '06
    Moves
    20541
    09 Sep '08 16:37
    Please ignore the above post.
    I forgot we have the 2008 Championship.
  3. I pity the fool!
    Joined
    22 Jan '05
    Moves
    22874
    09 Sep '08 20:12
    I think Ironman had beaten most of those players when he was at his peak - my money would be on him.

    With a bit of a prevailing wind, there could be some more removal of the engines who have made it to the next round of the championships - making for a bice clean final
  4. Russ's Pocket
    Joined
    04 May '06
    Moves
    53845
    09 Sep '08 21:221 edit
    Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
    I think Ironman had beaten most of those players when he was at his peak - my money would be on him.

    With a bit of a prevailing wind, there could be some more removal of the engines who have made it to the next round of the championships - making for a bice clean final
    Um Whats a "bice"
    is that a tactic I never heard of?
  5. Subscriberjb70online
    State of Confusion
    Lancashire
    Joined
    04 May '08
    Moves
    685171
    09 Sep '08 21:48
    Originally posted by cheshirecatstevens
    [b]Um Whats a "bice"?
    Who gives a buck?
  6. Joined
    02 Jul '07
    Moves
    2416
    10 Sep '08 12:22
    Originally posted by cheshirecatstevens
    Um Whats a "bice"
    is that a tactic I never heard of?
    Two or more buffalo?
  7. Joined
    06 Sep '07
    Moves
    11442
    10 Sep '08 19:27
    Originally posted by Squelchbelch
    Please ignore the above post.
    I forgot we have the 2008 Championship.
    ROFL!
  8. Aberdeen, Scotland
    Joined
    15 Apr '08
    Moves
    5743
    10 Sep '08 19:42
    can someone fill a curious (relatively) newbie in...what's a 3.b guy? i noticed that clivestraddle had been banned. why? have all those others mentioned been banned for the same reason?
  9. Standard memberclandarkfire
    Grammar Nazi
    Auschwitz
    Joined
    03 Apr '06
    Moves
    44348
    11 Sep '08 04:27
    Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
    I think Ironman had beaten most of those players when he was at his peak - my money would be on him.

    With a bit of a prevailing wind, there could be some more removal of the engines who have made it to the next round of the championships - making for a bice clean final
    I don't know that much about him, but from looking at his games and forum posts, I think it is reasonable to suggest that he as well as cludi were genuinly good players, (maybe 2200+), and just used engines to blundercheck, or only in some games.
  10. Account suspended
    Joined
    05 Sep '08
    Moves
    1502
    17 Sep '08 17:15
    Originally posted by rja211077
    can someone fill a curious (relatively) newbie in...what's a 3.b guy? i noticed that clivestraddle had been banned. why? have all those others mentioned been banned for the same reason?
    Correct me if I'm wrong but I think 3b is refering to section 3 b) of the Terms of Service on this site- http://www.timeforchess.com/myhome/termsofservice.php
  11. Aberdeen, Scotland
    Joined
    15 Apr '08
    Moves
    5743
    19 Sep '08 08:57
    ok thanks...next question...how are they found out? don't get me wrong, i'm not trying to dodge the bullet myself - i'm clean as a whistle - just curious as to how this type of cheating is weeded out.
  12. Account suspended
    Joined
    05 Sep '08
    Moves
    1502
    19 Sep '08 14:50
    Originally posted by rja211077
    ok thanks...next question...how are they found out? don't get me wrong, i'm not trying to dodge the bullet myself - i'm clean as a whistle - just curious as to how this type of cheating is weeded out.
    I have no idea.
    But all the players mentioned in the initial post of this thread were banned from the site for some reason. The poster seems to think it was 3b, who knows?!

    The post regarding cludi and ironman being genuine players who blunder checked or only cheated in some games also makes me wonder how detection is actually done...

    Anyone?
  13. Standard memberclandarkfire
    Grammar Nazi
    Auschwitz
    Joined
    03 Apr '06
    Moves
    44348
    22 Sep '08 01:29
    Originally posted by BlitzNewbie
    I have no idea.
    But all the players mentioned in the initial post of this thread were banned from the site for some reason. The poster seems to think it was 3b, who knows?!

    The post regarding cludi and ironman being genuine players who blunder checked or only cheated in some games also makes me wonder how detection is actually done...

    Anyone?
    As far as I know, for the most part players banned for cheating must have a certain match up rate with an engines first three choices. (something like 85% or so)

    Plenty of people have questioned that it is simply a strong player, but the highest matchups ever maintained by the worlds strongest correspondence chess players is something like 82%.

    Players must also have played a certain number of games; One game will never sufice as proof.

    I think cludi was very because he seemed to have a tremendous knowledge of chess, and still keeps up a very interesting chess blog.

    I'm not sure about Ironman, but since he beat all the other cheats, and a strong player working with an engine will almost always be better than just an engine, he either was very strong, or just had a very strong engine.

    What do you mean, they were banned for some other reason? They were all banned for cheating, 3b.
  14. Account suspended
    Joined
    05 Sep '08
    Moves
    1502
    22 Sep '08 03:55
    Originally posted by clandarkfire
    As far as I know, for the most part players banned for cheating must have a certain match up rate with an engines first three choices. (something like 85% or so)

    Plenty of people have questioned that it is simply a strong player, but the highest matchups ever maintained by the worlds strongest correspondence chess players is something like 82%.

    Players must also have played a certain number of games; One game will never sufice as proof.

    Thanks for this background.

    I think cludi was very because he seemed to have a tremendous knowledge of chess, and still keeps up a very interesting chess blog.
    Where is that blog?


    What do you mean, they were banned for some other reason? They were all banned for cheating, 3b.

    I'm not suggesting anything. Just pointing out that they could theoretically have been banned for any violation of the TOS, or did I miss something here?
  15. Standard memberclandarkfire
    Grammar Nazi
    Auschwitz
    Joined
    03 Apr '06
    Moves
    44348
    22 Sep '08 22:29
    Originally posted by BlitzNewbie
    Thanks for this background.

    [b]I think cludi was very because he seemed to have a tremendous knowledge of chess, and still keeps up a very interesting chess blog.

    Where is that blog?


    What do you mean, they were banned for some other reason? They were all banned for cheating, 3b.

    I'm not suggesting anything. Just pointing out that th ...[text shortened]... ould theoretically have been banned for any violation of the TOS, or did I miss something here?[/b]
    Here is the blog: http://www.clausjensen.com/

    No they were banned for cheating. There used to be a list of banned players and what the were banned for, but it was removed. All the listed players were banned for 3b
Back to Top