Clan consultation vote

@ghost-of-a-duke said

(I voted against 1 man clans which to me doesn't constitute a clan).

Well we are on the same page there anyways! Mark that down doesn't happen often!!! 😛 😉

-VR

@suzianne said

And WTF, is Russ on a sabbatical? No answer to my question yet, after posting it in three forums.

Suzie Q,

Do you think Russ should drop everything he is doing just to answer a question you have? Perhaps if you stop pestering him you may get an answer to the question. Now you have a Great Day!!! 🙂

-VR

@mghrn55 said
In fact players have left lemondrop's clan in the past.
He might try to convince the community that he booted them.
But I think they left because they weren't getting any games.
That's what I noticed on a few occasions.

I believe you are absolutely correct on that one!

-VR

@wolfe63 said
I took it to mean challenge size and voted for 3. A happy medium.

Ok.
Suppose two 5 player clans try to set a challenge but find they can only set 1 pairing where 2 opponents fall within the 200 rating limit.
Is the challenge dead in the water ?

@mghrn55 said
Ok.
Suppose two 5 player clans try to set a challenge but find they can only set 1 pairing where 2 opponents fall within the 200 rating limit.
Is the challenge dead in the water ?

The answer to that, my friend, resides above my pay grade.

And I do appreciate that yourself and the other leaders are taking the time to hammer out an equitable agreement. I enjoy the clan battles most of all.

@very-rusty said
Suzie Q,

Do you think Russ should drop everything he is doing just to answer a question you have? Perhaps if you stop pestering him you may get an answer to the question. Now you have a Great Day!!! 🙂

-VR

Idiot.

@suzianne said
Idiot.

Suzie Q, do you think calling names makes you look good?

Or you just talking using one word now? Either way it sure shows your maturity.

-VR

@mghrn55 said
Ok.
Suppose two 5 player clans try to set a challenge but find they can only set 1 pairing where 2 opponents fall within the 200 rating limit.
Is the challenge dead in the water ?

Only 2 players? I am sure it wouldn't be that difficult to find more than 2 players that are seperated by less than 200 rating limit!!! Is it really that hard?

-VR

@very-rusty said
Only 2 players? I am sure it wouldn't be that difficult to find more than 2 players that are seperated by less than 200 rating limit!!! Is it really that hard?

-VR

It's hypothetical.

@very-rusty said
Only 2 players? I am sure it wouldn't be that difficult to find more than 2 players that are seperated by less than 200 rating limit!!! Is it really that hard?

-VR

Have you ever run your own clan, Mr. Blowhard?

"Those who can, do. Those who can't, bitch." -- Suzianne

@very-rusty said
Only 2 players? I am sure it wouldn't be that difficult to find more than 2 players that are seperated by less than 200 rating limit!!! Is it really that hard?

-VR

I'll soften the example up a bit and remove the exaggeration.
Two 5 player clans try to set a 5 player challenge.
But only 4 matchups meet the 200 rating point window.
The challenge does not meet the 5 matchup requirement.

So, the challenge is dead in the water, right ?

@mghrn55 said
I'll soften the example up a bit and remove the exaggeration.
Two 5 player clans try to set a 5 player challenge.
But only 4 matchups meet the 200 rating point window.
The challenge does not meet the 5 matchup requirement.

So, the challenge is dead in the water, right ?

Not if the other leader sends back a note wanting to change the one match up.

At least that is the way it worked on the other site where I was a co-captain and put challenges together.

-VR

@suzianne said
Have you ever run your own clan, Mr. Blowhard?

"Those who can, do. Those who can't, bitch." -- Suzianne

You should know by now I've been a co-captain on another site putting together challenges. You just don't pay attention to anything but the sound of your own music.

IF you are such a great leader why are sitting on 3rd page?

-VR

@very-rusty said
Not if the other leader sends back a note wanting to change the one match up.

At least that is the way it worked on the other site where I was a co-captain and put challenges together.

-VR

I think you missed my point.
If Russ's question put to a vote was
"Minimum number of matches for a challenge ?"
If that minimum is set to 5 games, then two 5 player clans try to set a 5 player challenge.
But they can only get 4 matchups to fit the 200 rating difference requirement.
Then the challenge is dead. Correct ?

And if the answer is yes, then the clan feature suffers.

That is my point.

@mghrn55 said
I think you missed my point.
If Russ's question put to a vote was
"Minimum number of matches for a challenge ?"
If that minimum is set to 5 games, then two 5 player clans try to set a 5 player challenge.
But they can only get 4 matchups to fit the 200 rating difference requirement.
Then the challenge is dead. Correct ?

And if the answer is yes, then the clan feature suffers.

That is my point.

As a first step at addressing some persisting clan issues, I have created a series of votes regarding changes to the clans as they stand now.

These consultation votes are only available to those eligible for clan play. (Subscribers)

Please cast your votes.

Preferred MINIMUM clan members before a challenge can be made?




Preferred MAXIMUM number of clans a player can be a member of?




Preferred MAXIMUM clan members permitted in each clan?

I don't see Minimum number of matches for a challenge?
One of us is confused! Perhaps you meant clan players/members?

-VR