Clans
28 Jun 18
Originally posted by @padgerI fail to understand that you don't understand the figures. They are self explanatory. What is it that you don't understand about them? Challenges, games, points. Easy peasy. Some people are just plain dumb. You Padger are the dumbest of the dumb.You make VESPIN look like a rocket scientist.
You seem to be under the impression that I have something against you or your clan
I couldn't care less about who wins the clan challenge
I just want a fair points system
The one we have at the moment is rubbish built on straw
We need something that is worthwhile not what we have at the moment
I would like to be able to go back say 3 years and see how ...[text shortened]... he years end result is unknown
You could put any figure in it and nobody could prove you wrong
Have you learnt to tie your shoelaces yet or have given up and just wear slip ons?
Originally posted by @radioactive69OK
I fail to understand that you don't understand the figures. They are self explanatory. What is it that you don't understand about them? Challenges, games, points. Easy peasy. Some people are just plain dumb. You Padger are the dumbest of the dumb.You make VESPIN look like a rocket scientist.
Have you learnt to tie your shoelaces yet or have given up and just wear slip ons?
Here are your results for last year T O D
Show me from these figures how you arrive at the last one
47 58 30 481 502 77 71 " 523 "
I promise if you can
I will stop complaining about the points system
Originally posted by @padgerThank god for that.
OK
Here are your results for last year T O D
Show me from these figures how you arrive at the last one
47 58 30 481 502 77 71 " 523 "
I promise if you can
I will stop complaining about the points system
The "last one" is arrived at by adding the gross points won plus the drawn points. In our case the our gross win points plus our drawn points equalled 503. As opposed to net points which is a total of gross points won, plus drawn points, less lost challenge points. in our case that totalled 71 points.
Now shut your trap and get on with losing games.
Originally posted by @radioactive69That is gobbledegook and you know it
Thank god for that.
The "last one" is arrived at by adding the gross points won plus the drawn points. In our case the our gross win points plus our drawn points equalled 503. As opposed to net points which is a total of gross points won, plus drawn points, less lost challenge points. in our case that totalled 71 points.
Now shut your trap and get on with losing games.
How can you use a final figure before it is known
Originally posted by @radioactive69You are wasting your time trying to explain anything to the brain dead one.
Thank god for that.
The "last one" is arrived at by adding the gross points won plus the drawn points. In our case the our gross win points plus our drawn points equalled 503. As opposed to net points which is a total of gross points won, plus drawn points, less lost challenge points. in our case that totalled 71 points.
Now shut your trap and get on with losing games.
Plus all that counts towards title is the default net points total.
The brain dead will never understand.
If he had a single idea how to improve the system players might listen.
You have explained but his poor wee quarter brain still does not understand
Originally posted by @roma45Now I can see why you two go so well together
You are wasting your time trying to explain anything to the brain dead one.
Plus all that counts towards title is the default net points total.
The brain dead will never understand.
If he had a single idea how to improve the system players might listen.
You have explained but his poor wee quarter brain still does not understand
You haven't got a brain cell between you
26 Jul 18
Originally posted by @padgerWow, pot calling the kettle black.
Now I can see why you two go so well together
You haven't got a brain cell between you
Dude, I just explained it to you. It's basically like saying 5 + 3 = 8, and 5 + 3 - 4 = 4.
I take it you flunked maths big time when you were at school. It's basic remedial maths. What don't you understand !!!
Originally posted by @radioactive69Explain to me how you can use the end argument before you have reached the end
Wow, pot calling the kettle black.
Dude, I just explained it to you. It's basically like saying 5 + 3 = 8, and 5 + 3 - 4 = 4.
I take it you flunked maths big time when you were at school. It's basic remedial maths. What don't you understand !!!
26 Jul 18
Originally posted by @padgerWhat ??????
Explain to me how you can use the end argument before you have reached the end
What the hell are you babbling on about now? Damn your stupid. I may have to get VESPIN to explain it to you in dumbo language. I don't think I can explain it any plainer even though I've dumbed it down as much as possible for you.
Gee folks.........we've got one here alright !!!!!
Originally posted by @padgerThere are final results listed for each year. Pretty easy to see them.
You seem to be under the impression that I have something against you or your clan
I couldn't care less about who wins the clan challenge
I just want a fair points system
The one we have at the moment is rubbish built on straw
We need something that is worthwhile not what we have at the moment
I would like to be able to go back say 3 years and see how ...[text shortened]... he years end result is unknown
You could put any figure in it and nobody could prove you wrong
As far as the rules, they were created over 15 years ago, and modified 3 different times.
They surely seem to have held up well.
It appears you have been unable to grasp the rules.
They are actually relatively easy, except the most recent modifications have made it
more difficult to function in....yet it is functional.
I personally don't care for the game of soccer (or football as you say - not to be confused with American football).
I think most of the game is quite boring. That is my opinion.
However, I don't call the game rules rubbish. I don't call the game rubbish.
There are many who enjoy the game and like the rules.
This is why I don't play or watch soccer.
Perhaps you should consider refraining from clan chess.
You admittedly don't understand it.
Originally posted by @padgerOkay, sit down and listen and I will explain it to you.
OK
Here are your results for last year T O D
Show me from these figures how you arrive at the last one
47 58 30 481 502 77 71 " 523 "
I promise if you can
I will stop complaining about the points system
In clan challenges they completed last year.....
They won 47 challenges, they lost 58 challenges and they tied 30 challenges
There are the first 3 numbers
Next, in actual games (games make up challenges)
They won 481 games, lost 502 games and drew 77 games.
There are the next three numbers explained.
The last two numbers are the NET points and the Gross points
The Gross points are the total number points obtained from the challenges you won.
You won 47 challenges for the year (we saw this earlier) Those 47 wins amassed a total amount of points to the sum of 523.
This is the last number in the sequence.
The Net points is the total of the Gross points won minus the gross points lost from lost
challenges. (The lost points are figured the same way as the won points.
It is the total points that were lost in the 58 challenges you lost). This figure would be 452 points.
To calculate the net points you would take the 523 gross points won minus the 452
gross points lost which leaves you with a net of 71 net points. This is the nest to last figure in your string.
It is all very easy, as long as you can do simple math.
If you need to interpret the results, your clan was slightly below average in that you lost more than you won in actual challenges.
However, you won more larger challenges since you ended up with a slightly positive net points of 71.
There, your problem is solved and the "mystery" of how those numbers were derived
have been clearly and succinctly explained for you in easy to follow detail.
Originally posted by @shortcircuitNice explanation Shorty.
Okay, sit down and listen and I will explain it to you.
In clan challenges they completed last year.....
They won 47 challenges, they lost 58 challenges and they tied 30 challenges
There are the first 3 numbers
Next, in actual games (games make up challenges)
They won 481 games, lost 502 games and drew 77 games.
There are the next three numbe ...[text shortened]... mbers were derived
have been clearly and succinctly explained for you in easy to follow detail.
I'll just add to that in regards to drawn challenges. Points gained for drawn challenges are also added into the gross and net figures to arrive at the net total (second last figure) and the gross total (last figure).
Hope he can follow these explanations..............but I doubt it !
Originally posted by @radioactive69He could not follow a sign in a hotel to find breakfast.
Nice explanation Shorty.
I'll just add to that in regards to drawn challenges. Points gained for drawn challenges are also added into the gross and net figures to arrive at the net total (second last figure) and the gross total (last figure).
Hope he can follow these explanations..............but I doubt it !
What a complete idiot Can you imagine him playing poker?
Originally posted by @shortcircuitThis is still gobbledegook
Okay, sit down and listen and I will explain it to you.
In clan challenges they completed last year.....
They won 47 challenges, they lost 58 challenges and they tied 30 challenges
There are the first 3 numbers
Next, in actual games (games make up challenges)
They won 481 games, lost 502 games and drew 77 games.
There are the next three numbe ...[text shortened]... mbers were derived
have been clearly and succinctly explained for you in easy to follow detail.
You do not have constant in any of your arguments
Therefore it is rubbish
You just make the numbers fit the figures not the other way round
Originally posted by @padgerAre you thick? The numbers are EXACTLY what I represented them to be.
This is still gobbledegook
You do not have constant in any of your arguments
Therefore it is rubbish
You just make the numbers fit the figures not the other way round
The fact that YOU can't understand simple math DOES NOT make them rubbish.
We have identified the problem...and it is YOU.