Originally posted by MctaytoSays The fellow who is throwing won games and resigning games at the beginning of a challenge to "Easy Riders". You know how silly you make yourself sound?
We can't implement those codes here as they would have to get rid of every metallica player and flunkies for breaking these ethics day in and day out
Kind Regards,
Sincerely
-VR
Originally posted by moonbusSir,
I believe I may have found something which may prove useful, if only as boilerplate.
Have a look at this:
http://www.uschess.org/content/view/7538/35/
Scroll down to Standards Of Conduct item 6 c) and d).
Perhaps some similar wording could be incorporated into RHP clan rules. Proving intent in cases of infractions would be tough though.
Perhaps that would be something you might want to put in"Site ideas", which may get followed much closer than the conversations in this forum. I personally haven't looked at it yet.
Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR
Originally posted by moonbusi assume at cambridge you studied "how to throw toys out of prams" congratulations you got a first
@roma45
Just because it made no sense to you doesn't mean it made no sense. It's a microcosm of what's going at the clans section of RHP.
Since you resort to impugning me personally and challenging my credibility, I presume you have no rational argument against my proposals.
1] you noticed within minutes of joining this site it was flawed, but you stayed four years
2] you also noticed as a blind man would [your words] the clan system is not a level playing field, you wait nearly four years then you join a clan
3] your "credibility" is a joke, just because you boost of playing for the cambridge uni team, means nothing on here, we have submarine commanders mafia dons professional cage fighters, i could claim to be any one, it all means nothing without proof.
4] if you can fix every thing just start your own chess site, you will make millions as you obviously have all the answers.
5] you being cambridge educated [cough cough] i thought you might figure out what this thread is about, sadly no you are intent with supporting the cheats
6] even if you did have all the answers, only Russ can change things on here, so your ideas are totally useless
7] for someone who does not like petitions [again your words] what exactly are you doing in the middle of one?
p.s i actually played board one at cambridge uni team,
Originally posted by roma45Best laugh for years, Romadrool playing board 1 at cambridge 🙂 🙂 😀 😀
i assume at cambridge you studied "how to throw toys out of prams" congratulations you got a first
1] you noticed within minutes of joining this site it was flawed, but you stayed four years
2] you also noticed as a blind man would [your words] the clan system is not a level playing field, you wait nearly four years then you join a clan
3] your "credibilit ...[text shortened]... ly are you doing in the middle of one?
p.s i actually played board one at cambridge uni team,
You couldn't play a six year old and hope to give a good game
Originally posted by MctaytoSir,
Best laugh for years, Romadrool playing board 1 at cambridge 🙂 🙂 😀 😀
You couldn't play a six year old and hope to give a good game
I am really not trying to hurt your feelings and hope this doesn't. I do know 6 year olds who could kick your butt,( well one 6 year old would be more correct) if your rating is under 1600 that is.
Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR
Originally posted by Mctaytoi knew it would go straight over your head
Best laugh for years, Romadrool playing board 1 at cambridge 🙂 🙂 😀 😀
You couldn't play a six year old and hope to give a good game
making a point that players lie on here
you know submarine commander, cage fighter mafia don,i suppose a guy from chicago could have played for cambridge personally i think hes full of it.
for the record it was actually board one at oxford. i have beat you many times back in the day when i thought you were normal that is.
romadrool, sad pathetic insult even had to borrow that from your master robbie,
you are not even worth my time to bother with an insult back, you are a child,
may karma catch you on RHP and in life
Originally posted by roma45As I suspected, you have no rational argument against my proposals, so you resort to impugning me personally. It's a cheap trick, worthy of the Spirituality Forum.
i assume at cambridge you studied "how to throw toys out of prams" congratulations you got a first
1] you noticed within minutes of joining this site it was flawed, but you stayed four years
2] you also noticed as a blind man would [your words] the clan system is not a level playing field, you wait nearly four years then you join a clan
3] your "credibilit ...[text shortened]... ly are you doing in the middle of one?
p.s i actually played board one at cambridge uni team,
Originally posted by moonbusa cheap trick?
As I suspected, you have no rational argument against my proposals, so you resort to impugning me personally. It's a cheap trick, worthy of the Spirituality Forum.
you decided on boosting about your far superior intellect playing for the cambridge uni team.
you might be telling the truth, only you know, but history has told me those who boost to try and look all knowledgeable are normally far from it.
spirituality forum? i stay well clear of there, a persons religious beliefs have not much to do with chess.
rational argument? there is no point in debating with you on that issue because
1] you have no interest in the current topic, i would like to see what happened last year repeated but this time with points removed, that would be the first step in restoring order to what's being going on.
2] do you think Russ reads what we write in here? only he can make changes, if you read the OP you will clearly see i asked who thought on the same lines as me with regards to the blatant cheating four clans are doing. it does not matter what idea you or anyone comes up with, nothing will change.perhaps if you send feed back or go to site ideas some thing might happen.
you talk about this is not a court of law, then you use law to say no rules have been broken, which is it?
now you play the victim saying that i am impugning you personally.
now that's a cheap shot, expected from mctayto or robbie, i assume they don't teach manners at cambridge.
Originally posted by roma45You are not capable of posting without making a personal attack so why are you surprised when it is pointed out to you ???
a cheap trick?
you decided on boosting about your far superior intellect playing for the cambridge uni team.
you might be telling the truth, only you know, but history has told me those who boost to try and look all knowledgeable are normally far from it.
spirituality forum? i stay well clear of there, a persons religious beliefs have not much to do with c ...[text shortened]... s a cheap shot, expected from mctayto or robbie, i assume they don't teach manners at cambridge.
boost ?? perchance boast ???
As to superior intellect, he would simple have had to complete 4th grade in primary school to surpass your mental ability 😉
Originally posted by MctaytoSir,
As to superior intellect, he would simple have had to complete 4th grade in primary school to surpass your mental ability 😉
Are you saying that he didn't complete grade 4 in primary school? That is terrible! Sorry to hear about that.
I am sure roma45 will have a response for you.
Kind Regards,
Have a great evening, what is left of it,
Sincerely,
-VR
Originally posted by Mctaytopersonal attacks is all you do, have been for years, you are a disgrace to this site and to the game of chess.
You are not capable of posting without making a personal attack so why are you surprised when it is pointed out to you ???
boost ?? perchance boast ???
As to superior intellect, he would simple have had to complete 4th grade in primary school to surpass your mental ability 😉
i simply pointed out to voonbus to post his idea in site ideas or to send feed back, if that is an insult hes had a sheltered life
plus using "i played for the cambridge uni team" what has that got to do with any thing on here? plus no proof so whats the point? it's as bad as trying to use a higher ratings grade to try and win an argument.
i misspell a word, have done it before will no doubt do it again, knock yourself out.
curious every time anyone makes an awkward post about your cheating proof provided, you only reply with insults "drool groupie flunkie etc" you are a cancer to this site and how you get away with your attempts to ruin it is beyond me.
may karma get you here and in life
Originally posted by Mctaytoeven a third grade primary school kid would not do
As to superior intellect, he would simple have had to complete 4th grade in primary school to surpass your mental ability 😉[/b]
Game 11766952
very curious history you two have, 21 pages of games played against each other, you dominated him at the start, but recently you have resigned all after a few moves.
is the mighty enforcer intimidated?
using anti-metallica leader as a ratings leveler?
playing with yourself?
you are a cheat, all the evidence is in your game history,
may karma catch you on RHP and in life
you sad little boy
Originally posted by roma45Well said Roma
personal attacks is all you do, have been for years, you are a disgrace to this site and to the game of chess.
i simply pointed out to voonbus to post his idea in site ideas or to send feed back, if that is an insult hes had a sheltered life
plus using "i played for the cambridge uni team" what has that got to do with any thing on here? plus no proof so wha ...[text shortened]... w you get away with your attempts to ruin it is beyond me.
may karma get you here and in life
McTumour has been a blight on this site for as long as I can remember. How bad is your life going when you have to spend every minute of it believing that somehow Metallica has robbed you and you need to cheat and collude to make yourself feel better by seeing them beaten (albeit the most hollow victory ever).
What a sad and miserable life McTumour leads. We should all feel sorry for him.