20 May '09 06:57>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieA few years ago I would agree with the sentiment here but not now. I wonder if you were able to tell that the new Star Trek Movie, Spiderman II, Call of duty 3, Under the Tuscan Sun and a whole host of other movies were electronic, computer generated scores.
if you want to produce electronic, computer generated sounding music, then that is all well and fine, but its like computer generated art, you can tell its done on a computer as opposed to a canvas with oils!
I have piano samples that you can only tell apart from most real grand pianos because the samples are so much better. Only a real Steinway D sounds better but you try and record it with anything close to the professionalism that the sound engineers who produced the samples have.
It's no longer like it used to be with a single sample of a note that gets mutated in software to reflect how you played it. Each note is sampled multiple times at different velocities, with different additional notes open to catch the reverberations of the other piano strings. Then they are all sampled again with soft pedal down and then sustain and then both. Separate samples for stoccato and after trails. The software streams these samples off disk as you play with optional features such as picking different samples for the same note if played twice in quick succession or specific legato samples if you happen to be playing legato. You then get all these samples recorded from three different positions so you can place the listener close to or further from the piano. It is a revelation to hear.
I do understand there's nothing like live playing of real instruments but how many people have access to the actual Gretch drum kit used by Metallica or a Bosendorfer 290 piano and a big name sound engineer to record them on vintage Neumann microphones.