@wildgrass saidWell people love throwing money at people with no documented foot print, it isn’t like that money can be followed. Ripe for corruption!
Is that a quote from the article?
The documented footprint is the money, I think.
@wildgrass saidIf there is not a paper trail you got what, word of mouth?
Corruption can also be measured, obviously.
You want us to pretend the data is invisible when everyone can see it. There's a term for this.
@wildgrass saidI keep saying it because it’s true. You cannot point to what the numbers are when there isn’t a paper trail. You can have someone create accounts for Bob or Jose, send them checks, and collect the money themselves or direct it wherever they want, as they don’t have a verifiable history that is documented. Give them credit cards and let them spend the money; it is ripe for corruption. If corruption is present, I imagine they will want to protect the gravy train. Look at California, they have lost millions that they cannot account for, and not just for the undocumented.
What the heck dude? Why do you keep saying that?
It'd be like if we were just trampled by a herd of elephants and you said "What elephants?"
@KellyJay saidYou state the absence of a paper trail and then go on to describe all the paper needed to make it happen..how absurd.
I keep saying it because it’s true. You cannot point to what the numbers are when there isn’t a paper trail. You can have someone create accounts for Bob or Jose, send them checks, and collect the money themselves or direct it wherever they want, as they don’t have a verifiable history that is documented. Give them credit cards and let them spend the money; it is ripe for ...[text shortened]... California, they have lost millions that they cannot account for, and not just for the undocumented.
@wildgrass saidYou are not engaging your brain.
You state the absence of a paper trail and then go on to describe all the paper needed to make it happen..how absurd.
@wildgrass saidIt is impossible to detect fraud without a baseline for comparison, such as validated historical information that distinguishes truth from lies. Therefore, when you are giving money to people who have no historical context to reference, fraud is impossible to detect.
"fraud is impossible to detect."
- Kellyjay
@KellyJay saidNewsflash: it is possible to detect fraud.
It is impossible to detect fraud without a baseline for comparison, such as validated historical information that distinguishes truth from lies. Therefore, when you are giving money to people who have no historical context to reference, fraud is impossible to detect.
Your statements both reflect delusion. The reality is people go to prison for the exact crime you claim is undetectable.
You still have not read the article I posted or even googled the evidence of this. It's easy to find but you refuse.
@wildgrass saidThen go find the millions California cannot account for.
Newsflash: it is possible to detect fraud.
Your statements both reflect delusion. The reality is people go to prison for the exact crime you claim is undetectable.
You still have not read the article I posted or even googled the evidence of this. It's easy to find but you refuse.
@wildgrass saidSetting up the system so it cannot validate its work is a system that people can plunder; you want to keep going on and on, do it with someone else.
No. Wait ... You had 14 posts saying it was undetectable and now this post???
Stop giving me your busy work.
Of course some fraud exists, duh. Just because some fraud goes unpunished doesn't mean it's not detectable.