1 edit
Originally posted by abejnood9/11 was not used as an excuse to invade iraq it was used as an excuse to take out bin laden who took credit for the attack!! when you can disprove bin laden and the videos of the planes and the fact that
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=403757&in_page_id=1770&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=NEWS&ct=5
What do you think?
the hijackers have not been seen since 9/11 nor the other people on the plane then maybe i'll consider it... till then the burden of proof remains on you.
Edit:get your story down to one single version BTW
1 edit
Originally posted by abejnoodThe article says in part: "Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=403757&in_page_id=1770&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=NEWS&ct=5
What do you think?
Well, the US occupied Kuwait, didn't they? So WHERE IS ALL THAT FREAKIN' FREE OIL!?!??!
By this theory, Kuwait should be a fully owned colony of the United States which does nothing but pump oil directly into US tankers for absolutely zero payment. Or else!
Nice theory -- but then why is oil over $2 a gallon in the US?
I've got it! There is a SECOND conspiracy that routes all the oil directly to China and funnels payments to a secret Swiss bank account under the control of -- wait for it -- Dick CHENEY!
Ya, sure, you betcha.
So war mongers in the White House engineered the 9/11 attacks in order to have a pretense to occupy Iraq and thereby drive up the price of oil so oil companies could have a windfall?
Hmmm.
You know, there are so many easier ways to accomplish a shock in world oil prices (e.g. ask the Saudis to please cut production because of American/Israeli imperilaism) -- I guess I just don't buy it.
Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug...and just because you have a suposed motive it does not mean you have any evidence or even a crime
I don't buy it either. Bush and co bombing the Owrld Trade centre??
Absolutlely no way!! There was easier ways to start the supposed ball rolling.
1 edit
Originally posted by SiskinI wonder what method is opposite "Occam's Razor"?
So you conspiracy theorists believe that if the planes had flown into the World Trade Centre but they hadn't collapsed then the US government would have just shrugged their shoulders and said 'accidents happen'?
Perhaps "Occam's Simpleton Wife's Conspiracy Recipe"?
Originally posted by spruce112358if they could only find "75 top professors", the probabibility of it's being true is nil.
The article says in part: "Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries."
Well, the US occupied Kuwait, didn't they? So WHERE IS ALL THAT FREAKIN' FREE OIL!?!??!
By this theory, Kuwait should be a fully ow ...[text shortened]... bank account under the control of -- wait for it -- Dick CHENEY!
Ya, sure, you betcha.