@Suzianne saidI had heard something about Amazon partnering with flock to integrate Ring doorbell cameras into their national surveillance system. I actually kind of wish they would try that because they'll lose 90% of their customers almost immediately. Does anyone really want government officials (and AI spam bots) spying on what's happening on your front porch?
Wealthy people are better able to pay people off.
@wildgrass saidOnly time mentioned in this thread and I was answering a nut job. I think someone’s panties are in a wad. I think you need to crawl back under something and relax.
This issue of mass government surveillance actually is opposed by both libertarians and liberals on opposite ends of the political spectrum. The only folks I can see who support it are the authoritarian "law and order" types who thump their chests and say "I ain't got nothing to hide" while ignoring all the obvious harms that come with these surveillance programs.
And yo ...[text shortened]... t to talk about gender? Again? You're obsessed. Get off this thread with your weirdo hyperfixations.
@wildgrass
You noticed you like the clown yesterday that cried about name calling, he overlooked the thousands of times libs did this, no comparison. You are overlooking the endless comments like this on your crybaby side😉.
@YEAH-BOY saidBesides the point, but I've noticed that most people under the age of 30, growing up in the cell phone auto-correct texting age, all write like 5 year olds.
Stop thinking. The longer you think the dumber you get. You write like a 5 yr. old.
Whatever they learned about grammar in kindergarten is sufficient to type out a text, but not to have a conversation.
@mike69 saidI like the clown that cried?
@wildgrass
You noticed you like the clown yesterday that cried about name calling, he overlooked the thousands of times libs did this, no comparison. You are overlooking the endless comments like this on your crybaby side😉.
This will keep getting worse until voters and taxpayers stop allowing your governments to purchase and deploy surveillance technology at this scale and in the absence of reasonable safeguards.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4709502/warrantless-surveillance-fourth-amendment-chatrie/
One more news story on this, kind of a mixed bag of bad news because the government is forcing companies to provide them with the user data of law-abiding reporters without a warrant, and good news I guess that politicians are finally listening to their constituents that they don't want to be spied on constantly by the government...
The request from the Oregon senator Ron Wyden and the representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington seen by the Guardian comes amid mounting scrutiny over the way the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently used its power to issue administrative summonses related to customs matters to make extraordinary unilateral demands for information. They sent their request to the government accountability office (GAO), the non-partisan congressional watchdog.
The Guardian reported this week that Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the investigative arm of the DHS, has used the summonses to secretly obtain six months’ worth of telephone records for Georgia Fort, a Minneapolis journalist. In one particularly stunning episode, it issued an administrative summons to Google requesting information on the YouTube accounts of Fort and Don Lemon after a judge had twice rejected a search warrant application for the information, telling the government Fort and Lemon needed to have a chance to contest the request.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/01/lawmakers-trump-obscure-law-investigation