Originally posted by SeitseAnd I have yet to hear you complain about Mexico and how they treat thier immigration. But I have read many of you opinions about the U.S. immigration.
Dude, study law before you speak about the law.
And stay on topic. We're not talking about my country here nor I have ever
posted "get those immigrants out of it".
Kids do that, you know: "b... b... but Martin gave him a wedgie too, Mrs. Crabapple!"
As said, if you perpetrate the negative stereotype of the Americans the terrorists win.
Do you hate America?
Originally posted by torch71Stop being a child.
And I have yet to hear you complain about Mexico and how they treat thier immigration. But I have read many of you opinions about the U.S. immigration.
We're speaking about the U.S. and the "everybody does it then we're fine"
argument is not proper of an intelligent person.
If you can't stay on topic, then you should debate in the Sesame Street forums.
Moreover, you haven't backed up your claim yet: when was the law "born"
and how was the pre-U.S. world "lawless"?
I am waiting.
Originally posted by SeitseWell I have yet to see any written law of the inhabitants prior to the U.S. settlers.
Stop being a child.
We're speaking about the U.S. and the "everybody does it then we're fine"
argument is not proper of an intelligent person.
If you can't stay on topic, then you should debate in the Sesame Street forums.
Moreover, you haven't backed up your claim yet: when was the law "born"
and how was the pre-U.S. world "lawless"?
I am waiting.
What law "born" are you refering to.
And like I said prior you have many posts about immigration in the U.S.. Do you have any on Mexican immigration?
For all the anti immigration guys and anti 'illegal alien' guys, if you are against the free flow of people and labour, can I assume that you are also against the free flow of trade and capital? If not, then why not? Is it morally justifiable to make money off the backs of less fortunate nations/people but to deny them the opportunity to better their lives in your country?
Originally posted by torch711. Lulz, so law must be written so it is law? This made my day 😵
Well I have yet to see any written law of the inhabitants prior to the U.S. settlers.
What law "born" are you refering to.
And like I said prior you have many posts about immigration in the U.S.. Do you have any on Mexican immigration?
2. Non sequitur. What is the argumentation link? Er... do you have any on disco
dancing?
If you want my comments about Mexican immigration, create a thread about it
and I will gladly post my point of view. Ok? This is about another subject, which
you keep dodging, maybe for lack of solid arguments.
Originally posted by SeitseI have posted my comment on the thread topic, but I have yet to see yours. As far as I read you went right to the questions then the insults. As if you do not want to reply to the THREAD TOPIC.
1. Lulz, so law must be written so it is law? This made my day 😵
2. Non sequitur. What is the argumentation link? Er... do you have any on disco
dancing?
If you want my comments about Mexican immigration, create a thread about it
and I will gladly post my point of view. Ok? This is about another subject, which
you keep dodging, maybe for lack of solid arguments.
Originally posted by torch71Same as in the other thread: what insults? 😕
I have posted my comment on the thread topic, but I have yet to see yours. As far as I read you went right to the questions then the insults. As if you do not want to reply to the THREAD TOPIC.
Ok, I see you won't backup your claim that there was no law before the
English boats arrived. Please refrain from making affirmations which you can't
backup. It only proves, oh well, you know.
As for the other thing, create the thread and I will gladly post. If you want to
deviate the subject here, then you are incurring in the childish attitude I
mentioned earlier.
Originally posted by SeitseOk then good night and hope you sleep well. Still did not see your answer on the thread topic, but oh well till another day maybe, must go get something to eat.
Same as in the other thread: what insults? 😕
Ok, I see you won't backup your claim that there was no law before the
English boats arrived. Please refrain from making affirmations which you can't
backup. It only proves, oh well, you know.
As for the other thing, create the thread and I will gladly post. If you want to
deviate the subject here, then you are incurring in the childish attitude I
mentioned earlier.
Originally posted by torch71Dude, if "smell you later" offends you like "you have the civic values
Just have to say before I go, again you make my point. I treat you with respect and bid you good night and you reply with smell you later. very very sad.
of a toaster", then I have to re-evaluate how I treat you in these forums.
I am sorry I offended you. I will treat you with more care in the future, ok?
Enjoy your lunch.
Originally posted by torch71My experience has been different, but I have had no contact with US immigration so I can't say much about it.
Absolutely not, speaking to the few legal immigrants I have befriended, it is a lenghthy process but not degrading. As for the illegals, they have received health care via free clinics, purchased property, and even make a tidy living, although it is hard work in the fields and warehouses that employ them they do live rather well. Probably better than some di ...[text shortened]... hard, it is the end of the journey you must keep in mind, and not opt for the easy alternative.
Still, it's obvious from this thread that many illegal immigrants do not have access to "fair pathway to earned legal status" and that many of your co-citizens want to keep it that way. Sure, they make a tidy living compared to the chances they had in their home country. But that doesn't mean they'll like the country or feel welcome. It's just a matter of earning more money by immigrating.