Go back
Auschwitz

Auschwitz

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
zeeblebot discovered that people die in a war. Wow.
Please speak zeeblebotese in this thread from now on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sardonicism

Sardonicism (from Latin: Risus sardonicus, a convulsive laughter) is the expression of derision, cynicism, or skeptical humor variously through comment, gesture, or writing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adam warlock
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

Sarcasm is the rhetorical device of using a characterization of something or someone in order to express contempt.[1] It is closely connected with irony, in that the two are often combined in the same statement.
your OP was sarcasm? wasn't that kind of heavy?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
your OP was sarcasm? wasn't that kind of heavy?
No.

I was indicating that I could reply to your post with some sarcastic remark in zeeblebotese. But obviously I failed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
what i remember from Somalia is the amount of criticism the US came in for for not doing the response just the way certain people wanted.

----

http://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=half+measures&go=Go

Wikiquote: half measures
we could see global peace, but not without breaking a lot of eggs first.

not saying the continuance of a low state of global warfare is the liberals/euroweenies/humanitarians' intents, but that is what they are achieving.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adam warlock
No.

I was indicating that I could reply to your post with some sarcastic remark in zeeblebotese. But obviously I failed.
so you agreed with my sarcasm?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
so you agreed with my sarcasm?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_(word)

No is an English/Old English word indicating rejection, disagreement, refusal or making a negative response or exclamation. In most cases, it is the opposite of yes.

No stands by itself as a grammatically sufficient and well-formed response to questions that can be answered yes or no.

Vote Up
Vote Down

😵

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clara_Peller

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adam warlock
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_(word)

No is an English/Old English word indicating rejection, disagreement, refusal or making a negative response or exclamation. In most cases, it is the opposite of yes.

No stands by itself as a grammatically sufficient and well-formed response to questions that can be answered yes or no.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stupidity

Stupidity is a quality or state of being stupid, or an act or idea that exhibits properties of being stupid.[1] The root word stupid,[2] which can serve as an adjective or noun itself, comes from the Latin verb stupere, for being numb or astonished, and is related to stupor.[3]

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stupidity

Stupidity is a quality or state of being stupid, or an act or idea that exhibits properties of being stupid.[1] The root word stupid,[2] which can serve as an adjective or noun itself, comes from the Latin verb stupere, for being numb or astonished, and is related to stupor.[3]
No need to introduce yourself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democide#20th_century_democides_causing_more_than_one_million_deaths.

20th century democides causing more than one million deaths.

From Death by Government, Rummel, 1987. Several estimates have been revised after this date.

Location ↓ Dates ↓ Est. Deaths ↓
Cambodia 1975–1979 2,035,000
China ...[text shortened]... 1945–1987 1,670,000
Yugoslavia (Tito) 1944–1987 1,072,000
U.S.S.R. 1917–1987 61,911,000
I don't think Rummel is a reliable source.

Vote Up
Vote Down

that's fine, exact quantities are not needed for this point.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
that's fine, exact quantities are not needed for this point.
What point?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adam warlock
No need to introduce yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion

"Although non-specific concepts of madness have been around for several thousand years, the psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers was the first to define the three main criteria for a belief to be considered delusional in his 1917 book General Psychopathology. These criteria are:

certainty (held with absolute conviction)
incorrigibility (not changeable by compelling counterargument or proof to the contrary)
impossibility or falsity of content (implausible, bizarre or patently untrue)"


I feel really sorry for you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion

"Although non-specific concepts of madness have been around for several thousand years, the psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers was the first to define the three main criteria for a belief to be considered delusional in his 1917 book General Psychopathology. These criteria are:

certainty (held with abso ...[text shortened]... lsity of content (implausible, bizarre or patently untrue)"


I feel really sorry for you.
Are you stalking me?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adam warlock
What point?
c'mon. track it back.