3 edits
@mott-the-hoople saidHe doesn’t need to campaign, who else is mr and mrs fascist USA gonna vote for.
taking time and resources away from being able to compaign, and as of Friday trying to silence him…you communist dickhead!
So you’re saying in effect he could shoot someone in the face and his trial would be election interference?
Have you got a short list of stuff he cannot do with impunity, obviously treason and oath breaking won’t be on it
The people decided on his guilt in 2020 and 2022 with they binned anyone on the big tickets associated with or recommended by him and now the justice system has to pretend that nothing happened and there’s no case to answer in order to give him the opportunity to hone his democracy ending skills.
DUH ok 👍
@no1marauder saidConversely, if the Repubs were winning presidential elections by getting less popular votes a majority of EC votes, left wingers would be screaming for its abolition.
It's hard to change the Constitution.
If the Democrats were winning Presidental elections by getting less popular votes but a majority of EC votes, right wingers would be screaming for its abolition and like a good mindless follower you'd be screaming with them.
Whew.
@averagejoe1 saidI've been against the Electoral College for decades.
Conversely, if the Repubs were winning presidential elections by getting less popular votes a majority of EC votes, left wingers would be screaming for its abolition.
Whew.
This guy agreed with me until it was to his advantage:
The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy.
11:45 PM · Nov 6, 2012
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/[WORD TOO LONG].newsweek.com%2Ftrump-tweet-electoral-college-disaster-1545716
1 edit
@AverageJoe1
I'll try this question ( which none will answer) one more time. We can all agree and stipulate that at best, the swirlling information around the Bidens, the 170 SARs,, the 20 bank accounts, the pseudonyms, the dealings of money from foreign countries (No business dealings in the USA ??!!?), the whistleblower testimony, etc etc, gives us pause, and wonderment, about what is going on in the Biden family? Even their greatest defender Marauder must think that somethin' just ain't right, don't you know?
So Biden sits on thte beace and observes the thousands of hours trying to find the simple answers, to put it all to rest.
Joe Biden could pick up a phone and in 10 minutes give all the answers.
Marauder, .................why doesn't he? You may say it is none of the business of his 330M subjects, but you would be wrong, and you would be avoiding this question.
@averagejoe1 saidStop the BS. There is literally nothing Joe Biden could say that would stop the Republicans from pursuing this; they've been doing it for years and think it is to their political advantage.
@AverageJoe1
I'll try this question ( which none will answer) one more time. We can all agree and stipulate that at best, the swirlling information around the Bidens, the 170 SARs,, the 20 bank accounts, the pseudonyms, the dealings of money from foreign countries (No business dealings in the USA ??!!?), the whistleblower testimony, etc etc, gives us pause, and wonderme ...[text shortened]... the business of his 330M subjects, but you would be wrong, and you would be avoiding this question.
Have you ever considered the possibility that Joe doesn't know anything about his relatives' bank accounts? I don't know how much is in my sister's account and don't really want to know.
Why has it been sooooooooooooooooooooo hard to find one nickel going to Joe from these dealings? Why don't YOU answer a question for a change?
@no1marauder said"
Stop the BS. There is literally nothing Joe Biden could say that would stop the Republicans from pursuing this; they've been doing it for years and think it is to their political advantage.
Have you ever considered the possibility that Joe doesn't know anything about his relatives' bank accounts? I don't know how much is in my sister's account and don't really want to ...[text shortened]... d to find one nickel going to Joe from these dealings? Why don't YOU answer a question for a change?
Have you ever considered the possibility that Joe doesn't know anything about his relatives' bank accounts?"
LMFAO @ marerider
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@mott-the-hoople saidOMG how could he even ask that?
"
Have you ever considered the possibility that Joe doesn't know anything about his relatives' bank accounts?"
LMFAO @ marerider
20+ million dollars spread across the family from dozen dummy companies, and he wouldn't know?
He really is deluding himself.
@jj-adams saidAnd yet not a single penny traced to Joe!
OMG how could he even ask that?
20+ million dollars spread across the family from dozen dummy companies, and he wouldn't know?
He really is deluding himself.
Just because right wingers desperately want to believe something doesn't make it true; you clowns believe many, many things that are demonstrably false.
@no1marauder saidThis response is WORSE than a dodge, jesus.
Stop the BS. There is literally nothing Joe Biden could say that would stop the Republicans from pursuing this; they've been doing it for years and think it is to their political advantage.
Have you ever considered the possibility that Joe doesn't know anything about his relatives' bank accounts? I don't know how much is in my sister's account and don't really want to ...[text shortened]... d to find one nickel going to Joe from these dealings? Why don't YOU answer a question for a change?
Try just this one thing.
Joe has a company thru which he runs his money... it is called Celtic Capris. On his 2017 and 2018 tax returns, he reported that he had $12.6M in income for those 2 years. In 2019, filing his application to run for president, a financial disclosure, he reported that during those same 2 years, he says that he only had $7.4M in income . What accounts for that $4M discrepancy?
This question, from me to you.....
#1. It is not about Trump
#2. It is not about 'Joe doesn't know about relatives' bank accounts".
#3. It is not about 'Republicans pursuing". You are getting like Suzianne. It is about what Joe did. Not about some pursuit.
#4 It is not about political advantage
Please get back on track and make this interesting....or be like Suzianne.
@mott-the-hoople saidThat was pretty funny, LMFAO from me too.
"
Have you ever considered the possibility that Joe doesn't know anything about his relatives' bank accounts?"
LMFAO @ marerider
You may as well got to a movie Mott, he won't directly answer my question, he is a bot.
@no1marauder saidHey Marauder, what about a 'trace' on the 4M I just wrote hereinabove?
And yet not a single penny traced to Joe!
Just because right wingers desperately want to believe something doesn't make it true; you clowns believe many, many things that are demonstrably false.
Jesus. Give it up.
@no1marauder saidBut to his son Hunter. If DJT jr. was in the same mess would you be so forgiving?
And yet not a single penny traced to Joe!
Just because right wingers desperately want to believe something doesn't make it true; you clowns believe many, many things that are demonstrably false.
People do corrupt things to help their sons and daughters.
@metal-brain saidLet's give him time, he is probably up to his neck in research about the problem I just gave him.
But to his son Hunter. If DJT jr. was in the same mess would you be so forgiving?
People do corrupt things to help their sons and daughters.
Can you IMAGINE his coming back with...'you got me'.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@no1marauder saidI'll split the difference with you, we're both half right:
Actually, there is no "presumption of innocence" explicitly stated in the US Constitution, so by the logic you've expressed in this thread it doesn't exist. But the Framers considered it a part of the requirement of "due process of law" just like they considered "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" to be limited to official misconduct of the officer sought to be impeached. Funn ...[text shortened]... rsons all the time on this board although you generally reserve that for people of a certain "race".
https://www.lawinfo.com/resources/criminal-defense/is-the-presumption-of-innocence-in-the-consti.html
@no1marauder saidYou are a living smoke screen.
And yet not a single penny traced to Joe!
Just because right wingers desperately want to believe something doesn't make it true; you clowns believe many, many things that are demonstrably false.
Not a single penny?????????????????
Here is just one piece of evidence. A long-standing FBI informant has testified, under oath that Burisma gave $5M to Joe and $5M to Hunter, you have multiple emails, all of that admissible in court....that is evidence. What we don't have is where the money is deposited, but I think, and you don't, that they will find out.
I believe that shrouded in your smoke screen is confusion over the difference in evidence, and proof. No proof yet, but evidence abounds!!