189d
@mott-the-hoople saidThey don't need wars anymore. Have you seen our peacetime budget?
these rich guys just love wars...lots of money to be made
189d
A major problem in the US-mind (read: alt-right pea brain) is that they constantly fail to see the US as part of a whole wide world.
So, when talking about, say, corona-measures, they only see US measures and fail completely in the realisation that nearly every single healthcare system and government came to the samw conclusions.
When the US economy takes a dive, they fail to see a world wide recession and are unable to place the US’s position in a greater context.
The samw with the price of petrol, global warming, morality-changes.
Their outlook on life and perspectives are very self-centred. Hence they constantly draw wrong conclusions.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
189d
@averagejoe1 saidDamn right, he violated his oath to defend the United States from its enemies, both foreign and domestic by opening up our borders.
@AverageJoe1
You are aware, I am sure, that Biden put his hand on the Bible, and his first promise was to protect the United States of America. To open our southern border is the exact opposite. So he has broken that oath, and he is not protecting our country. I wish that he would get up tomorrow morning go to lectern and tell everyone that he has failed. Thank you very much.
He's committed treason and is a traitor.
189d
@suzianne saidYou make my point. You see, Biden tells us about wages going up...like yours. But he fails to close his comment, he could have added 'We are still in trouble, though, because all of the necessities are costing more and not keeping up with wages. A box of cereal costs $9, and so on. So folks,, I'm not joking**, the increase in wagss has no effect on your being able to get ahead. You will continue to get behind under my administration, Mexicans taking your jobs, etc., and my chokehold on oil production."
Actually, it is. I made more than last year, for like the 20th year in a row.
What's wrong with you?
** He always says I am not joking. Yeah we know that ....but, what IS he doing?
189d
@jj-adams saidThis point is inconvenient for our faerie dependent liberals, so they will not respond to it.
Damn right, he violated his oath to defend the United States from its enemies, both foreign and domestic by opening up our borders.
He's committed treason and is a traitor.
Just like, they do not answer questions.
189d
@shavixmir saidYou a globalist, are you? So is Hillary etc. If you had your way, you would want hte USA to fall in line with all you dependents and, well, be global. All one happy family. Would I have to hire you to work for me when you demand to have a lot time off to ride around in the countryside.? Would I be allowed to fire people like you? Naaaa, I didnt think so..
A major problem in the US-mind (read: alt-right pea brain) is that they constantly fail to see the US as part of a whole wide world.
So, when talking about, say, corona-measures, they only see US measures and fail completely in the realisation that nearly every single healthcare system and government came to the samw conclusions.
When the US economy takes a dive, they ...[text shortened]... utlook on life and perspectives are very self-centred. Hence they constantly draw wrong conclusions.
Sounds like you want to mix up cultures. Let us know how that goes when some tribesmen from the Congo matricuilate amongst you and the kids.
189d
@suzianne saidSuzianne the Sage has spoken. Funny you knock the Court (Trump's court) in the abortion matter, when they clearly ruled on Constitutional law in reversing Roe. They upheld the Constitution. The conservative judges did. The liberal judges wanted to ignore the Constitution and let the Roe decisions stand.
The problem is the reduction in rights caused by the Supreme Court. Trump's Supreme Court.
Democrats uphold the Constitution far more than Republicans. Trump ignores it every day that he continues his run for the White House.
There is no "invasion", unless you mean the invasion of the House by the MAGA Republicans.
You're welcome for this wake-up call.
So, sue, were the liberals wrong, and the conservatives right, in respecting and ruling on the provisions of the Constitution?
189d
@sonhouse saidI think he will be absolved for January 6, because there was no insurrection. I think in Georgia, I would rule in his favor just because I saw at least one person, pushing a cart around with ballots, and just pulling them out from everywhere. To me that renders the entire election process void.
@AverageJoe1
What, do you think that will absolve your god king Trump?
As for his case in New York City, regarding financial confusion, the biased judge in that case, who posed for pictures with a big smile from the bench on day one, will rule against him. However, on appeal, there will be no problem, and certainly not in the supreme court. The only thing I really worry about this is not being on the ballot, as he will certainly win. I hope he wins so we can all get rich. And stop the wars.
188d
@jj-adams saidPlease. In your own minds, maybe, and even then, only because your Orange Jesus says so.
Damn right, he violated his oath to defend the United States from its enemies, both foreign and domestic by opening up our borders.
He's committed treason and is a traitor.
188d
@averagejoe1 saidWhat pure, unmitigated bullstuff.
Suzianne the Sage has spoken. Funny you knock the Court (Trump's court) in the abortion matter, when they clearly ruled on Constitutional law in reversing Roe. They upheld the Constitution. The conservative judges did. The liberal judges wanted to ignore the Constitution and let the Roe decisions stand.
So, sue, were the liberals wrong, and the conservatives right, in respecting and ruling on the provisions of the Constitution?
50 years of Supreme Courts, mostly conservative, thought it was perfectly constitutional. Dream up another argument. Did you know Johnson has been trying to make birth control illegal?
188d
@averagejoe1 saidPull your head out. We're not like you MAGA zombies.
No, contrare',I know that it was you who wrote that post, I am simply getting into lumping the libs who are exactly alike into one entity., so I can answer you by writing Sonhouse and kill 2 birds with one stone.
188d
@averagejoe1 saidAnd you call us 'idealists'.
I think he will be absolved for January 6, because there was no insurrection. I think in Georgia, I would rule in his favor just because I saw at least one person, pushing a cart around with ballots, and just pulling them out from everywhere. To me that renders the entire election process void.
As for his case in New York City, regarding financial confusion, the biased j ...[text shortened]... g on the ballot, as he will certainly win. I hope he wins so we can all get rich. And stop the wars.
Except your fever dream is far from ideal.