Originally posted by AThousandYoungIs that a serious question? Clinton lied about his personal affairs. Bush lied about an international war scenario and as such thousands of people have died, the middle east has become unstable and I have a continuous headache from arguing with rednecks all the time! What do you think? ๐
Which one's lies were more acceptable for a President to make?
Originally posted by stokerNot all of them lie. But the ones that do lie always get the majority of the votes since they tell the people all the crap they want to hear while knowing its impossible for them to actualy forfill their promises.
who would vote for someone who told the truth?? politians know this and spin there own webs of decite, sadly its not restricted to a nation but widespread.
Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboardWhat confuses me is how everybody seems to know this and yet still goes and votes the lying expletives into power anyway.
Not all of them lie. But the ones that do lie always get the majority of the votes since they tell the people all the crap they want to hear while knowing its impossible for them to actualy forfill their promises.
Originally posted by StarrmanI think you are correct; and I get the same headache, but not only from rednecks. Those who read their bibles, and little else, assure us that sexual crimes and lies are the worst sins imaginable. Clinton is ging to hell, where the Democratic Party will be holding its next convention. Lying about substantive policy matters is something Americans expect from our Presidents because God is on our side.
Is that a serious question? Clinton lied about his personal affairs. Bush lied about an international war scenario and as such thousands of people have died, the middle east has become unstable and I have a continuous headache from arguing with rednecks all the time! What do you think? ๐