@KellyJay saidi provided it. if you think there is a greater context, do your own research. I have 0 faith that you wouldn't demand an even greater context and waste my time
If you want to provide it, provide it. The vast majority of those who know him and have known him for years do not say he was a racist but a kind, caring man. These are a mix of race, age, and sex.
His retractors who smear his name and delight in the death of a husband and father of two little kids. These don’t care about his murder and proudly announce their distain ...[text shortened]... e take anything they can to smear him, and those who disagree with them, get labeled no differently.
"The vast majority of those who know him and have known him for years do not say he was a racist but a kind, caring man. "
You mean the vast majority of those that agreed with him and all the racist crap he said. Nobody else thought he was anything but a vile scumbag who would say anything for money.
" His retractors who smear his name and delight in the death of a husband and father of two little kids."
Evil people can be husbands and fathers. I see 0 use in faking what, grief, that a person who would say children dying in mass shootings is an acceptable price to pay so you can have guns.
He did not become a good person by shuffling off this mortal coil. He was a scumbag and now he will never have the chance to maybe redeem himself. He will always be remembered as a scumbag and we have the receipts to prove it.
"The take anything they can to smear him, and those who disagree with them, get labeled no differently."
You ghouls keep using "disagreement" as if our opinion differed on what topping is best on hot dogs or who was the greatest singer.
Also, it's not a smear if it happened.
@Zahlanzi saidZzz
i provided it. if you think there is a greater context, do your own research. I have 0 faith that you wouldn't demand an even greater context and waste my time
"The vast majority of those who know him and have known him for years do not say he was a racist but a kind, caring man. "
You mean the vast majority of those that agreed with him and all the racist crap he said. ...[text shortened]... pping is best on hot dogs or who was the greatest singer.
Also, it's not a smear if it happened.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThere is no bloody context you imbecile. He said a vile, disgusting thing and then he moved on to the next disgusting vile thing.
Why don’t you just quote it? In full context
I had a brief, fleeting moment where i thought maybe Kelly might realize what Chuckie said was evil and he would look the clip for himself, seeing it with his own eyes.
Joke's on me.
@Zahlanzi saidWhat I have seen is not vile, as I told you before about simply disagreements today can be thought of as hate speech. A few lines in a conversation does not a racist make if the points are not about hate but other topics. If you want to hate him you will.
Eloquently put.
So i guess you won't be looking for that greater context we "obviously" quoted all the vile crap he said.
You're such a good Christian. Jesus would be proud of you for the company that you keep and the figures you admire.
1 edit
@KellyJay said"It’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment."
What I have seen is not vile, as I told you before about simply disagreements today can be thought of as hate speech. A few lines in a conversation does not a racist make if the points are not about hate but other topics. If you want to hate him you will.
Charlie Kirk, expired scumbag
@Mott-The-Hoople saidYeah, your criteria for figuring out if a person is a real person or a sub human.
What color is their skin?
1 edit
@KellyJay saidAnd you clearly don't WANT to know the dark side of kirk. His racist and misogynist comments comes out just about every day.
I didn’t see any hate spreading from him, only disagreements when race was part of the conversation. I do see it in many here who are sticking labels on people, making them targets. Personally, I’m praying for the guy who shot him that he turns to the Lord for forgiveness. I think he is closer to that truth than many here who are wrapping themselves up in their own righteousness to stick hateful labels on lives, including one killed for that reason.
The REALLY sick part is Kirk is looked up to so if he says a woman should be barefoot and pregnant he is saying that to a thousand kids, some of whom WILL take up where he left off and start shooting people.
@Suzianne
Define "racism" and explain what is wrong with such "racism".
I did not see any directly racist remarks in the quotations you provided.
The main problem with the Americans is that they do not know the meanings of the words they often use.
It applies to the conservatives as well. For example, Trump's slogan "leftist lunatics" is meaningless. Of course, they are lunatics, but it is altogether mysterious in what sense these lunatics are "leftist".
In sum, it is meaningless to discuss with the Americans, because they do not know the meanings of their words.
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThank you for a simple answer to a simple question.
Hispanics are not white dumbass…unless it it fbi/doj stats which attribute crime of Hispanics to whites.
Damn you liberals live in a freakish world.
You want to accuse us whites of racism against Hispanic border crossers, then claim they are white. Fked up thinking there homer.
Italians. White or not white?
Greeks. White or not white?
Croatians. White or not white?
@fourfivesix saidInteresting that you should mention Jesus. When lepers and the blind came to Jesus to be healed, did he say to them "show me your green cards" ? If in doubt, ask @KellyJay--he'll give you a straight answer on that.
Jesus. Not white.
So, Rudi Giuliani is not white in your book. And Athina Onassis. And Goran Ivanišević. All not white.
How about Slovenians and Slovakians. White or not white?
2 edits
@fourfivesix saidThank you for a clear and direct answer to a straightforward question.
Jesus. Not white.
This next question might be slightly more difficult to answer. What proportion or ratio of white or not white blood must one have in one’s veins to be considered either white or not white? I will give an example to make this clear. Suppose a person has a Swedish father (I will assume Swedes count as white), and a Hispanic mother. Is the child to be considered white, because one parent is white? Or is this person to be considered not white, because one parent is not white? In other words, is the ratio 50-50? What about grandparents? Suppose a person has three Swedish grandparents, and one Hispanic grandparent, both parents being Swedes. Is the grandchild white or not white? In other words, is the ratio 1:5?