@mott-the-hoople saidI already explained to you what that meant.
“ Far from it; it stands in direct contradiction to what the Framers of the Reconstruction Amendments meant to achieve. ”
are you suggesting they wrote something they didn’t mean?
“ The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
It didn't mean the Amendments were meaningless until Congress decided to do something.
@metal-brain saidSonhouse is losing it. He really hates Trump. Maybe Trump outfoxed his uncle when buying land to build casinos???? Really....had to be Something......
Trump is not like Jesus.
Jesus was convicted of sedition, not Trump.
@averagejoe1 saidHe's definitely responsible for convincing more people to vote Trump than vice versy.
Sonhouse is losing it. He really hates Trump. Maybe Trump outfoxed his uncle when buying land to build casinos???? Really....had to be Something......
1 edit
@Wajoma
We will see won't we.
I think the women of America will save our sorry asses on the abortion issue.
Authoritarians like Trump LOVE to subjugate women, control all aspects of their lives, they want them pregnant and barefoot, cook our dinner, wash our cloths and SHUT THE FUK UP.
The Chinese dictators found out the hard way when they literally killed girl babies, 20 years later, no women to be found for the men who were PISSED and went on a huge rampage.
Hard lesson to learn.
Too bad American ultrarightwingnuts don't learn the same thing.
@mott-the-hoople saidYou still parlaying and playing Marauders word/link games? Save your powder for man to man conversation, only 10.5 months away.
“ Far from it; it stands in direct contradiction to what the Framers of the Reconstruction Amendments meant to achieve. ”
are you suggesting they wrote something they didn’t mean?
“ The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
Imagine the joy shaking these parasites down.
2 edits
@AverageJoe1
You don't know the HALF of it if your god king gets his sorry ass back in power and YOU WILL regret it, but far too late when our freedoms go out the window, but of course you will plan for that beforehand and will be sucking up to the new power structure POST democracy times and probably come out way ahead by being the best grifter in town supported by the new mafia mob boss.
I bet you would volunteer to be the ones manning AR15's to shoot teenagers and babies trying to get past our border when the new law will be shoot to kill, and you will LOVE it seeing bodies blown apart by rapid fire assault weapons.
All this just goes to prove you are in a Trump religion, more binding than even a cult.
People in a religion fight back all the harder when they are challenged and that is EXACTLY what you are doing right now, defending your religion. You and the millions of the rest of the magites.
2 edits
@no1marauder saidI ask is their proof positive, and you, you, write about Fox News?
Gee, could you have some of your Fox News legal experts confirm the proceedings that use the "100% proof positive" standard? Or is that something just for King Donald?
Everyone i asked if there was proof positive. This para legal writes about FOX news????? And this para also writes about Donald Trump???? Don;t believe me? That he answered in that way.?????? That , Marauder pulls up FOX, and Trump, from his go-to files to answer my reeeaaaaaal easy question.
He answered FOX news. I don't watch FOX news. Did I mention FOX News?
We got a live one here. Somebody jump in, i am keeping my powder dry. Ahhhh. 10.5 months.
@sonhouse saidEveryone write in your journals, Trump will dictate shoot to kill. Naaaaa, since Biden dictated (veiled as Exe Orders) things like stop pumping oil, it is not likely that that would be allowed again. Other than that, I dont see one Iota of danger in re-installing Trump.
@AverageJoe1
You don't know the HALF of it if your god king gets his sorry ass back in power and YOU WILL regret it, but far too late when our freedoms go out the window, but of course you will plan for that beforehand and will be sucking up to the new power structure POST democracy times and probably come out way ahead by being the best grifter in town supported by the new ...[text shortened]... will be shoot to kill, and you will LOVE it seeing bodies blown apart by rapid fire assault weapons.
10.5 months............
@sonhouse saidSonhouse says people should be free to abort babies. A guy and a girl sitting next to me on the subway think that abortion is wrong. Either they or Sonhouse have the better argument, wonder which it is...
@Wajoma
We will see won't we.
I think the women of America will save our sorry asses on the abortion issue.
Authoritarians like Trump LOVE to subjugate women, control all aspects of their lives, they want them pregnant and barefoot, cook our dinner, wash our cloths and SHUT THE FUK UP.
The Chinese dictators found out the hard way when they literally killed girl babies, 2 ...[text shortened]... uge rampage.
Hard lesson to learn.
Too bad American ultrarightwingnuts don't learn the same thing.
Then, just before I disembarked the subway, I turned to them and asked...."Should you and I, and maybe even our tax dollars, be involved in their macabre abortion decisions?"
Footnotes:
1)Planned Parenthood uses our tax dollars to abort babies
2)Can someone make an argument that abortion is not macabre?
@AverageJoe1
Like I said, you defend your religion, Trump IS your god and your god is clearly above the law and you think he is joking when he says he will pull out of NATO, put babies back in cages, invoke the insurrection act on day one so he can order the military to attack peaceful protesters.
And you don't believe a word of it, yet that has come directly out of the mouth of your Jesus.
Tell me why you don't believe your own god?
@averagejoe1 saidWhen you idiots are told something by your right wing propagandists, you just refuse to believe any contrary facts. I've shown this to you before but:
Everyone write in your journals, Trump will dictate shoot to kill. Naaaaa, since Biden dictated (veiled as Exe Orders) things like stop pumping oil, it is not likely that that would be allowed again. Other than that, I dont see one Iota of danger in re-installing Trump.
10.5 months............
"The US is now history's largest oil producer, according to S&P Global Commodities Insight.
Crude and condensate production hit a new global record this quarter.
"When you look back on 2008 — when US production was at a 62-year low, and exports were zero — it is a remarkable turnaround."
The US is now history's biggest oil producer as output continues to surge to all-time levels, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights.
Output of crude and condensate hit a new global record this quarter of 13.3 million barrels per day. That's part of a record 21.4 million barrels per day for total US liquids production."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/the-us-is-producing-more-oil-right-now-than-any-country-in-history-s-p-global-says/[WORD TOO LONG].
@sonhouse saidBiden put children in cages at the border and you know it. Why do you still repeat stuff like that when you know Biden did the same thing? Are you trying to fool us or yourself?
@AverageJoe1
Like I said, you defend your religion, Trump IS your god and your god is clearly above the law and you think he is joking when he says he will pull out of NATO, put babies back in cages, invoke the insurrection act on day one so he can order the military to attack peaceful protesters.
And you don't believe a word of it, yet that has come directly out of the mouth of your Jesus.
Tell me why you don't believe your own god?
2 edits
@no1marauder saidYou are projecting again. You refuse to believe any contrary facts. You are simply making false assumptions and trying to pass them off as evidence. Here is one example:
When you idiots are told something by your right wing propagandists, you just refuse to believe any contrary facts. I've shown this to you before but:
"The US is now history's largest oil producer, according to S&P Global Commodities Insight.
Crude and condensate production hit a new global record this quarter.
"When you look back on 2008 — when US production was at ...[text shortened]... istory%27s%20biggest%20oil%20producer,barrels%20per%20day%20for%20total%20US%20liquids%20production.
"Cassidy Hutchinson, a special assistant in the Trump White House, told the committee “there were concerns brought forward” to Meadows before the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but it was unclear what Meadows did with that information."
https://apnews.com/article/capitol-siege-steve-bannon-donald-trump-mark-meadows-congress-1c77eda3332af497c866bab774d26fad
You assumed Meadows told Trump what someone texted to Meadows, but you have no evidence of that. You also assumed those articles examined the timeline of what Trump was told and when he was told it. You have no evidence of that either. And Meadows refused to testify.
"Meadows has handed over thousands of text messages, but he has refused to sit for an interview, has argued that he is immune from having to testify by virtue of his White House position, and has sued the committee."
You are making too many assumptions because you want to believe it so badly.
You have also failed to consider the possibility that McCarthy lied so he didn't have to admit he didn't warn Trump while he saw it play out. And like I said before you have not established a timeline of these events. People warned Trump of the possibility of violence before the protest even took place.
Stop putting the cart before the horse. Trump had intel reports saying that there could potentially be violence on the 6th before the protest even took place. You need to prove "when" he was warned and what he was specifically warned about.
@metal-brain saidHere's a timeline and I don't care that someone who regularly relies on Tucker Carlson, Kim Iversen, zerohedge and other worthless sources doesn't like CNN:
You are projecting again. You refuse to believe any contrary facts. You are simply making false assumptions and trying to pass them off as evidence. Here is one example:
"Cassidy Hutchinson, a special assistant in the Trump White House, told the committee “there were concerns brought forward” to Meadows before the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but it was unc ...[text shortened]... t even took place. You need to prove "when" he was warned and what he was specifically warned about.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/10/politics/jan-6-us-capitol-riot-timeline/index.html
Even his dumb a** son was telling him to tell the mob to leave the Capitol:
"2:53 p.m.
Donald Trump Jr. texts Meadows, “He’s got to condem (sic) this [deleted]. Asap. The captiol (sic) police tweet is not enough,” according to messages obtained by CNN. Meadows replies, “I am pushing it hard. I agree.”
Sometime before 3 p.m.
Trump speaks on the phone with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who pleads with Trump to call off the mob, but Trump takes the side of the rioters, telling McCarthy that they seem to care more about the election results than he does, according to CNN reporting.
Around 3 p.m.
White House aides draft a statement for Trump to release, which would’ve condemned the violence and the “illegal” actions of the rioters, according to Hutchinson’s testimony. The statement was never released.
3:09 p.m.
Former Trump chief of staff Reince Priebus texts Meadows, “TELL THEM TO GO HOME !!!,” according to messages obtained by CNN.