15 Jul 09
Originally posted by generalissimoAll I can say is do a fact check on the story and don't just label where it comes from.
Kazet was a fool to ignore links simply because they're fox news, however, there are many people there who are indeed biased, there's no question about that.
15 Jul 09
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenmany fox news contributors are biased.
Who? And don't give me Hannity, everyone knows where he stands and he's not reporting news, he has an entertainment show that had been balanced by Colmes...who decided to leave. That's it, it's either hard news, Oreilly who attacks both sides, or Greta who basically covers entertainment stories...foxnews.com is hard news (no bias/opinions)..??..
I think the most balanced is O'reilly, even though he's too much of a puritan sometimes.
15 Jul 09
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenI'm not a "liberal", at least not in the American sense of the word.
i've got you pegged now..extremist liberal who can't think for himself. You drink the kool aid that Fox News isn't accurate and are right wingers. So, i guess you only watch MSNBC right? Please give me some examples of how Fox News is biased?
I just visited the front page of Fox News. On it, Obama's health care plan is viciously and one-sidedly attacked, accompanied by this text:
"It's said that a picture's worth 1,000 words, but House Republicans say this chart — called 'a web of bureaucracy' — represents the 1,000-page, $1-trillion health care reform bill being pushed by Democrats."
Ah, the good ole "some people say" weasel words! "House Republicans say", so it's not necessarily the viewpoint of Mr. Murdoch himself. Right.
I'm not an American so I don't watch American news very often. I've never watched any MSNBC.
15 Jul 09
Originally posted by KazetNagorraWhat the hell are you talking about, how is a picture caption showing bias? The caption is a cliché "a picture is worth a thousand words" that says that what some republicans say about the chart...How is that freaking biased? You are limited by how many characters you can put in a picture caption, but if you actually go into the article and read it it's simply a hard news article on the h.c. overhaul....by the freaking AP (associated press, not fox news).
I'm not a "liberal", at least not in the American sense of the word.
I just visited the front page of Fox News. On it, Obama's health care plan is viciously and one-sidedly attacked, accompanied by this text:
"It's said that a picture's worth 1,000 words, but House Republicans say this chart — called 'a web of bureaucracy' — represents the 1,000-p ...[text shortened]... rican so I don't watch American news very often. I've never watched any MSNBC.
You are obviously biased and you believe what you read (fox news is biased) on the 'biased' internet, instead of thinking for yourself. Thus, you have no credibility.
15 Jul 09
Originally posted by generalissimohehe...... Thats what my friends say as well. I will say he is a lil off his rocker sometimes but I have listened to him for 4 yrs now and he has predicted some of what is going on today. And if he is right inflation(huge) right around the corner which is really going to rock this country.
I think glen beck is too paranoid, he acts as if Obama was Stalin.
and he never looks at the both sides of an argument.
15 Jul 09
Originally posted by KazetNagorraYou can't just look at a cover and base an opinion. READ!!!!
I'm not a "liberal", at least not in the American sense of the word.
I just visited the front page of Fox News. On it, Obama's health care plan is viciously and one-sidedly attacked, accompanied by this text:
"It's said that a picture's worth 1,000 words, but House Republicans say this chart — called 'a web of bureaucracy' — represents the 1,000-p ...[text shortened]... rican so I don't watch American news very often. I've never watched any MSNBC.
15 Jul 09
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenYes, captions and pictures don't affect how people read an article. Good point.
What the hell are you talking about, how is a picture caption showing bias? The caption is a cliché "a picture is worth a thousand words" that says that what some republicans say about the chart...How is that freaking biased? You are limited by how many characters you can put in a picture caption, but if you actually go into the article and read it ...[text shortened]... on the 'biased' internet, instead of thinking for yourself. Thus, you have no credibility.
Also, it's hilarious that a Fox News viewer is accusing me of "not thinking for myself".
15 Jul 09
1 edit
Originally posted by KazetNagorraCan you explain that statement?
Yes, captions and pictures don't affect how people read an article. Good point.
Also, it's hilarious that a Fox News viewer is accusing me of "not thinking for myself".
Oh and I watch ABC,CBS and even MSNBC> What does that make me?
15 Jul 09
Originally posted by KazetNagorraall this coming from someone who says they dont watch us news..And how does watching news mean you can't think for yourself? You are making unsupported accusations about Fox News that you cant support, based on what you've heard. That is not thinking for yourself.
Yes, captions and pictures don't affect how people read an article. Good point.
Also, it's hilarious that a Fox News viewer is accusing me of "not thinking for myself".
15 Jul 09
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenIt took me about five seconds to support my accusation. I don't understand how you cannot see blatant propaganda in that - Goebbels would have been jealous.
all this coming from someone who says they dont watch us news..And how does watching news mean you can't think for yourself? You are making unsupported accusations about Fox News that you cant support, based on what you've heard. That is not thinking for yourself.