2 edits
@wajoma saidVAERS doesn't verify data it only collects reports. Anyone with internet access can report a claim to VAERS, you don't have to be a medical professional:
VAERS data is crystal clear: The COVID vaccines are killing an estimated 1 person per 1,000 doses (676,000 dead Americans)
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem
VAERS data is absolutely not "crystal clear".
1 edit
@shavixmir saidHaha, now the dodge.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66424582
This is where Wayo-ma’s a trailer ho, and MB’s conspiracy theories lead to.
Nutjob papers publishing nutjob articles and nutjobs threatening people’s lives.
Fukking morons.
Playing shag doody like a fish.
Expecting the ijit single emoji post again next, then I'll feed out a bit more line.
@shavixmir saidThe Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains, I had a read of your link, it admitted clotshot deaths then it said this:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66424582
This is where Wayo-ma’s a trailer ho, and MB’s conspiracy theories lead to.
Nutjob papers publishing nutjob articles and nutjobs threatening people’s lives.
Fukking morons.
"As well as more innocuous features, the Irish Light has published stories promoting conspiracy theories such as "Pfizer knew the vaccine would kill",
It's not a conspiracy theory when the BBC article first acknowledges seizure syrup deaths.
How many is the debate, not that they happen.
I can use your own words against you, I deflect with the shield of truth and shag doody ends up spearing himself in the foot.
I keep telling you shag doody, stick to the ijit single emoji, it's far less embarrassing for you.
1 edit
@wajoma said55 out of 50 million.
The Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains, I had a read of your link, it admitted clotshot deaths then it said this:
"As well as more innocuous features, the Irish Light has published stories promoting conspiracy theories such as "Pfizer knew the vaccine would kill",
It's not a conspiracy theory when the BBC article first acknowledges seizure syrup deaths.
How ...[text shortened]...
I keep telling you shag doody, stick to the ijit single emoji, it's far less embarrassing for you.
And thousands upon thousands of covid deaths amongst the unvaccinated.
Moron. The only shiit is in your head.
1 edit
@shavixmir saidWe're getting there shag doody, we're getting there, and I'll be savoring you flip flopping about in the bottom of the boat.
55 out of 50 million.
And thousands upon thousands of covid deaths amongst the unvaccinated.
Moron. The only shiit is in your head.
But first we need to acknowledge clotshot deaths are not a conspiracy theory. You can do that right, without losing face.
@wajoma saidYou really are deluded.
We're getting there shag doody, we're getting there, and I'll be savoring you flip flopping about in the bottom of the boat.
Go back to fukking kangaroos, you inbred incel.
Instead of posting lies, conspiracy theories and your own inadequacies.
@shavixmir saidThe BBC acknowledged its' not a conspiracy theory, Pfizer acknowledge clotshot deaths i.e. not a conspiracy theory, now it's time for the Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains to man up.
You really are deluded.
Go back to fukking kangaroos, you inbred incel.
Instead of posting lies, conspiracy theories and your own inadequacies.
@wajoma saidSo full of it, eh, you’ve scurried off with your tail between your legs in shame…
The BBC acknowledged its' not a conspiracy theory, Pfizer acknowledge clotshot deaths i.e. not a conspiracy theory, now it's time for the Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains to man up.
Or did a sexy koala in a polka dot bikini just whizz past your cell?
@vivify saidTrue, it is a gross underestimate. Only a fraction of vaccine injuries and deaths are reported.
VAERS doesn't verify data it only collects reports. Anyone with internet access can report a claim to VAERS, you don't have to be a medical professional:
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.htmlVAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem
VAERS data is absolutely not "crystal clear".
@metal-brain saidInsert nut-job emoji.
True, it is a gross underestimate. Only a fraction of vaccine injuries and deaths are reported.
@shavixmir
Then the CDC are nutjobs. From the link below:
"Underreporting is one of the main limitations of VAERS, whereby only a fraction of all adverse effects are ever reported."
http://vaersanalysis.info/method/