DARPA will destroy humanity

You want to regulate AI you say? Let's imagine you get your regulation of the private sector. DARPA is working on it for military purposes. You know, killing people to win wars. That sort of ugly stuff.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/07/anthropic-claude-ai-pentagon-us-military

Who regulates DARPA? That doesn't apply to DARPA you say?
Then I guess DARPA will destroy humanity. See the problem? It is not about saving humanity. It is an anti-competitive scam. Don't fall for it.

@Metal-Brain said
You want to regulate AI you say? Let's imagine you get your regulation of the private sector. DARPA is working on it for military purposes. You know, killing people to win wars. That sort of ugly stuff.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/07/anthropic-claude-ai-pentagon-us-military

Who regulates DARPA? That doesn't apply to DARPA you say?
Then I guess ...[text shortened]... See the problem? It is not about saving humanity. It is an anti-competitive scam. Don't fall for it.

@Suzianne said
Dumbass. Again.

Always arguing the exact wrong thing.

@Metal-Brain said
Who regulates DARPA?

@Suzianne said
And the hand always points in the exact wrong direction.

@Suzianne

So Putin says the Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/04/putin-leader-in-artificial-intelligence-will-rule-world.html

DARPA exists so Putin does not rule the world. Putin thinks the USA wants to rule the world. So both are in a race to keep each other from ruling the world. So DARPA and Putin are a threat to humanity. Right? Neither will slow down or submit to regulation. They are literally designing AI to kill people because that is what war is all about, yet people are crying for regulation of the private sector?

Now you know why the corporate news media dropped the AI scare like a hot potato. Because the whole thing is so stupid it like a house of cards. People have short memories too. Here is a quote from the link below:

"The Pentagon had unilaterally insisted on renegotiating its contract with Anthropic, the company whose AI model is the only one currently allowed into the federal government’s classified systems, in order to remove ethical restrictions that the company had placed on it."

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/03/inside-anthropics-killer-robot-dispute-with-the-pentagon/686200/

The Pentagon wanted to remove ethical restrictions that Anthropic had placed AI. And nobody but me is saying they are the biggest threat to humanity if you really believe AI is as scary as some claim. The US military removing ethical restriction from AI. What could go wrong? LOL!

So why aren't sonhouse and wildgrass freaking out over it?
Are they giving the Pentagon a free pass on tossing the AI ethics program in the trash?

Here is another quote:

" The Pentagon had kept trying to leave itself little escape hatches in the agreements that it proposed to Anthropic. It would pledge not to use Anthropic’s AI for mass domestic surveillance or for fully autonomous killing machines, but then qualify those pledges with loophole-y phrases like as appropriate—suggesting that the terms were subject to change, based on the administration’s interpretation of a given situation."

As appropriate? So the Pentagon wanted to use AI for fully autonomous killing machines. But only slow down and regulate the private sector? AI started in the private sector. It did not start at DARPA like the internet did. This whole AI scare is stupid.

@Metal-Brain said
@Suzianne

So Putin says the Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/04/putin-leader-in-artificial-intelligence-will-rule-world.html

DARPA exists so Putin does not rule the world. Putin thinks the USA wants to rule the world. So both are in a race to keep each other from ruling the world. So DARPA and Putin are a threat to ...[text shortened]... the private sector. It did not start at DARPA like the internet did. This whole AI scare is stupid.

@Suzianne said
Putin says. Trump says.

Why do you listen to either of them? They both lie. AND they're both evil.

One might think you'd look elsewhere for your role models.


And again, why are you listening to the Pentagon? Hegseth and Trump are both in charge of the Pentagon. Since they're both evil for starting Trump's War just to watch men die, why listen to them?

Don' ...[text shortened]... men cannot be trusted, and neither can the tools they will use to shut us up permanently be trusted.

@Metal-Brain said
Was Obama evil for starting a war to invade Libya?
Let me guess. That was different. Right?