Dems pulling out all stops? Hyenas will not abate….

@Suzianne said
Jesus, this is what is inherently wrong with this new Trumpublican Party.

Lose, and cry like a baby for four years.

Win, and cry like a baby for four years.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
BOTH are required by law…the election judge admitted as much

the only question is when will the judges be charged with violating election laws?

Why are right wingers so adamantly against counting all the votes?

Of course, a signature requirement is a valid way to verify ID but disenfranchising someone for forgetting to put a date on an envelope when all that matters is when it is received is an obvious violation of their right to vote. Hopefully when the PA Supreme Court finally gets around to reviewing the constitutional question it will stop this practice.

@no1marauder said
But the law doesn't say that those votes don't count - it doesn't say either way. That's why there were court cases i.e. to interpret the law.

@no1marauder said
A trial court and an appellate court disagreed and the PA Supreme Court didn't order differently until Monday (while still not reaching the merits of the Constitutional arguments).

So no violation of any law by the Boards.

@AverageJoe1 said
The law says,No1, that it cannot be counted if it is not dated. You have mastered word salad techniques for sure. Imagine Suzanne getting a handle on your posts.

@no1marauder said
Why are right wingers so adamantly against counting all the votes?

Of course, a signature requirement is a valid way to verify ID but disenfranchising someone for forgetting to put a date on an envelope when all that matters is when it is received is an obvious violation of their right to vote. Hopefully when the PA Supreme Court finally gets around to reviewing the constitutional question it will stop this practice.

@AverageJoe1 said
The law says,No1, that it cannot be counted if it is not dated. You have mastered word salad techniques for sure. Imagine Suzanne getting a handle on your posts.

@no1marauder said
Answer this question:

Why should you lose your right to vote because you forgot to put a date on an envelope?

@no1marauder said
Answer this question:

Why should you lose your right to vote because you forgot to put a date on an envelope?

@Mott-The-Hoople said
without a date placed on the ballot, could ballots be turned in AFTER the election?

And the issue wasnt about a date,
it was about no signature

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-pennsylvania-election-official-apologizes-controversial-comments-senate-recount-begins

@no1marauder said

There are time limits for ballots to be received but not for being filled out.

@AverageJoe1 said
Well , then why do the authorities have a right to tell me a process devised-by-them that I must follow.?What if say I want to write my vote on a piece of cardboard and have it delivered by my 9-yr old? Why can I not vote anyway that I want to. What if the law says sign exactly as my name is shown on passports, but I just print my initials. So you say there should NO gui ...[text shortened]... t was a law but that she would violate that law?!?? SHE calls it a law. You say it is not a law.

@Cliff-Mashburn said
Really? No time limits on filling them out?
So if someone comes along in a year and fills it out it'll still be counted?

@no1marauder said
That's not what the courts cases are about as I already showed.

There are time limits for ballots to be received but not for being filled out.