@no1marauder saidso right. declaration of independence.
UMM, that's not the Preamble to the Constitution.
@no1marauder saidThe reason why I don't respond is more because I don't have to. You keep insinuating that I have to
You are wrong.
Why don't you just admit it? There's a reason why Earl can't present any evidence that there is any significant voting fraud by non-citizens i.e. because it hardly exists because of safeguards already in the system.
show just cause for voting the way that I do,
wrong.
84% is all you have to remember, marauder. I win
@Earl-of-Trumps saidI wasn't asking you to "show cause for voting the way that I do"; I've pretty much figured that out.
The reason why I don't respond is more because I don't have to. You keep insinuating that I have to
show just cause for voting the way that I do,
wrong.
84% is all you have to remember, marauder. I win
I was asking you to present evidence to support your position in this debate, which you've miserably failed to do.
@no1marauder saidthe debate going on in this thread??
I wasn't asking you to "show cause for voting the way that I do"; I've pretty much figured that out.
I was asking you to present evidence to support your position in this debate, which you've miserably failed to do.
I think we all want to know if a voter is a citizen or not. Are you saying I have to prove that?
oi
@AverageJoe1 saidThey do not vote.
They don't vote!??!?!?!? How do you know that they are not voting if they are not required (according to wishes of Marauder) to prove they are citizens, and can thus EASILY VOTE. Geez
Wach out, dont get sideways with Marauder
They're not like you, willing to grab every advantage they are not entitled to.
Just because YOU'D do something, it doesn't mean EVERYONE would.
You're sick, man.
@no1marauder saidPrecisely.
You are wrong.
Why don't you just admit it? There's a reason why Earl can't present any evidence that there is any significant voting fraud by non-citizens i.e. because it hardly exists because of safeguards already in the system.
@AverageJoe1 saidStop lying. I told you no, pages ago.
Do I have a right as a citizen to know that all other voters are citizens? You are the last one here to tell us yes or no, everyone else has said definitely Yes.
It's none of your damned business.
Sound familiar?
But 99.x% of them are, depending on the state.
@AverageJoe1 saidIf you are confused, you can make bank that I am not.
Why did you write to me about Earl having written about the constitution in the middle of page 2?
I’m confused, so imagine how confused sue might be
2 edits
@Earl-of-Trumps saidWhy do Maruader and Suzianne not admit that the majority of americans want Photo ID? Why don't they?
The reason why I don't respond is more because I don't have to. You keep insinuating that I have to
show just cause for voting the way that I do,
wrong.
84% is all you have to remember, marauder. I win
Why don't they say "It is because democrats have absolutely NO platform, (except to run 'against Trump)" . They speak not of curing cancer, they speak of nothing. So, they have to find votes of losers and parasites to get themselves into office.
Oour worst fear today? Jasmine Crockett.
Marauder? Suzianne? Tell us why you do not go with the majority. Suzianne has promoted that often on the Forum/.
You won't . Forum posters who do no stand up are losers.
1 edit
@Earl-of-Trumps saidI am only asking why they are so disingenuous, the weaving and dodging only dilutes the delight of trading thoughts and ideas. Like, at least TELL us why you will not support the ideas, we dont know who you are so it will hardly soil your global reputations. You gotta admit it is an enigma. M says it is too much trouble to get ID, when people have trouble all the time, over and over like trips to the store or that long drive to a friend's house....dozens of times a year, like going to the grocery store or pharmacy. Trouble, big trouble. Or, if one is under dr care, the many trips to the dr. Trouble, big trouble.
@AverageJoe1
Well said, AJoe 😉
A trip to get an ID (with the underlying purpose of protecting voter integrity, Marauder,,,you know, that law stuff),,,,,,such an arduous trip??? Once, maybe 2 times in one's lifetime!.
C'mon, sue, beat Marauder to the reason we are asking for!!!!
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidYou're incapable of understanding other people's arguments that don't align with the views you exclusively hear on your right wing propaganda outlets. I've explained my opposition to the SAVE Act and photo ID requirements to vote in general many times on this Forum. They are unnecessary, ineffective for their stated purpose and burdensome.
Why do Maruader and Suzianne not admit that the majority of americans want Photo ID? Why don't they?
Why don't they say "It is because democrats have absolutely NO platform, (except to run 'against Trump)" . They speak not of curing cancer, they speak of nothing. So, they have to find votes of losers and parasites to get themselves into office.
Oour worst fear t ...[text shortened]... has promoted that often on the Forum/.
You won't . Forum posters who do no stand up are losers.
Got it?
1 edit
@no1marauder saidLet it be noted that you have set aside your argument that it is too much trouble. Thank you much, so we have that resolved that. Everyone can get a photo Id, they still have about eight months .
You're incapable of understanding other people's arguments that don't align with the views you exclusively hear on your right wing propaganda outlets. I've explained my opposition to the SAVE Act and photo ID requirements to vote in general many times on this Forum. They are unnecessary, ineffective for their stated purpose and burdensome.
Got it?
You submit a New argument ….That it is your personal opinion that getting a photo ID (and you left out proving citizenship) is
unnecessary and inneffective.
And please, you keep mentioning the save act. I am asking you for a personal opinion of whether somebody should prove themselves. This has absolutely nothing with the Save Act.
Are we to understand that a person who wants to vote in a United States election, let me get this right, should not have to prove to whomever that is in charge of such vote that he is a citizen of the United States of America?
@no1marauder saidWith the huge overwhelming number of people wanting this, what are the odds you’re correct? This should tell you that you and the others may not be the best people to listen to with poor logic and reasoning skills. If these aren’t the reasons, the others should make the liberal party be ashamed and not vote worthy.
You're incapable of understanding other people's arguments that don't align with the views you exclusively hear on your right wing propaganda outlets. I've explained my opposition to the SAVE Act and photo ID requirements to vote in general many times on this Forum. They are unnecessary, ineffective for their stated purpose and burdensome.
Got it?
1 edit
@mike69 saidI see no clamor for such laws in my State.
With the huge overwhelming number of people wanting this, what are the odds you’re correct? This should tell you that you and the others may not be the best people to listen to with poor logic and reasoning skills. If these aren’t the reasons, the others should make the liberal party be ashamed and not vote worthy.
If other States want it, fine, whatever happened to conservatives supporting "States' rights"?