@Earl-of-Trumps saidUMM, that's not the Preamble to the Constitution.
And you also do not have the constitutional right to drink water. 😞
No problemo! The preamble to the constitution to the rescue!
"...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness".
Those words are chilling. so cool.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThen maybe voters need to show their voting registration cards.
Owning a firearm is a constitutional right...is an ID required to buy one?
Every registered voter gets one. Easy-peasy.
To drive a car, you need a Driver's License. The registration card IS your Voting License.
If you want to pass a law putting your photo on your voter registration card, I'm good with that.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidAre you saying you're okay with getting arrested for voting?
voting isnt a constitutional right
@Earl-of-Trumps saidIt is already in the tenths of a percentage.
@no1marauder said - ...right wingers now want as a strategy to reduce citizen voting participation.
======================
, to reduce non-citizen cheater voting.
The republican party has no intentions whatsoever of stopping citizens from voting.
Keep your day job.
@Mott-The-Hoople said(Shrug) Something can be constitutional but still be a bad idea.
"Sure, no right is absolute; reasonable regulations are allowed'
so now you agree with us conservatives...good
@AverageJoe1 saidI honestly have no idea what you are ranting about.
No you certainly, of course do not have a right to invade anyone’s privacy or ask them what to do or tell them what to do, or to ask them what they are or who they are or where they came from and what their age is and all about their family and what church they go to. It is none of your business. Let’s get that out in the open in case you don’t know that. I would think y ...[text shortened]... ou keep haranguing about it. What is your problem and I’m surprised with you, marauder, about this.
I have already shown you (I know, you won't look at links) that every State in the Union has methods to verify that people voting are citizens.
What more do you want?
@Suzianne saidThey don't vote!??!?!?!? How do you know that they are not voting if they are not required (according to wishes of Marauder) to prove they are citizens, and can thus EASILY VOTE. Geez
Do you mean 'undocumented immigrants'?
No, they do not.
More to your idiotic point, they don't vote.
Wach out, dont get sideways with Marauder
@no1marauder saidWhat more do I want? My God in heaven man have you not gotten my question..... what I want is for you to tell us whether or not somewhat should be proven to be a citizen to vote. That is all I have ever asked for these 21 posts.
I honestly have no idea what you are ranting about.
I have already shown you (I know, you won't look at links) that every State in the Union has methods to verify that people voting are citizens.
What more do you want?
Can you not separate this question, one guy at a coffee table to another guy????. Follow me, Marauder.
I ask you if you think we should require a person to prove citizenship, and you start WRITING BACK ABOUT WHAT EVERY STATE IN THE UNION IS DOING!?!!!!!!!!!!!!?????!???!?!??!??!??!!??!?!?!?!
oooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhh. sonhousem (oops, meant marauder)......why do you not tell us what YOU YOU YOU think!!!!
so gay
@AverageJoe1 saidYou are wrong.
They don't vote!??!?!?!? How do you know that they are not voting if they are not required (according to wishes of Marauder) to prove they are citizens, and can thus EASILY VOTE. Geez
Wach out, dont get sideways with Marauder
Why don't you just admit it? There's a reason why Earl can't present any evidence that there is any significant voting fraud by non-citizens i.e. because it hardly exists because of safeguards already in the system.
@AverageJoe1 saidAre you really that much of an idiot? Seriously?
What more do I want? My God in heaven man have you not gotten my question..... what I want is for you to tell us whether or not somewhat should be proven to be a citizen to vote. That is all I have ever asked for these 21 posts.
Can you not separate this question, one guy at a coffee table to another guy????. Follow me, Marauder.
I ask you if you think we should ...[text shortened]... sonhousem (oops, meant marauder)......why do you not tell us what YOU YOU YOU think!!!!
so gay
I think existing safeguards are adequate to prevent non-citizens from voting and there is no need for the type of burdensome, ineffectual requirements that right wingers are insisting on.
@no1marauder saidIt's obviously not a right for Mott especially when the would be American, not conform to his idea of what an American is.
Didn't we already do this? It's specifically referred to as a right FOUR times in the US Constitution.
@no1marauder saidWhy did you write to me about Earl having written about the constitution in the middle of page 2?
You are wrong.
Why don't you just admit it? There's a reason why Earl can't present any evidence that there is any significant voting fraud by non-citizens i.e. because it hardly exists because of safeguards already in the system.
I’m confused, so imagine how confused sue might be
@no1marauder saidSo, should we require citizens prove they are citizens and have photo ids? 84% of us think yes. Do you think yes?
Are you really that much of an idiot? Seriously?
I think existing safeguards are adequate to prevent non-citizens from voting and there is no need for the type of burdensome, ineffectual requirements that right wingers are insisting on.
@no1marauder saidMy daughter and family, returning from Italy Olympics Friday……ina socialist America, 2030, will they be able to afford such a trip to the Olympics to be held in France?
Are you really that much of an idiot? Seriously?
I think existing safeguards are adequate to prevent non-citizens from voting and there is no need for the type of burdensome, ineffectual requirements that right wingers are insisting on.