@kevcvs57 saidI Do not care so much, though it is a little self righteous, it being used as it being legislated that we must use it, watch the damn clip, no-one on the beloved ( by the left ) bbc tells Jordon he is wrong, and the trans, that I enjoyed most of what he said, did not correct him and even seemed to affirm what he said.
Er no it wasn’t, it was designed for the exact purpose I cited in my post. Use it or don’t use it no one but a control freak would care.
Do you care if people choose to use it?
It is amazing to me that even faced with the facts you remain delusional.
The full clip is also a good watch.
@zahlanzi saidReally, facts do not count if you do not like who is saying them?? It might be that Jordon presents the facts but it is more that your leftist broadcaster does not refute it and in fact it is rather confirmed by not being refuted. You gotta be bat s$%t crazy to dismiss it simply because you do not like a person, but then, well seems so.
she obviously watched enough to realize it's a jordan peterson video and therefore pseudo intelectual pretentious bullcrap.
1 edit
@jimmac saidThread 197249
Well, that speaks mountains about your ability to think. At least I know just how closed minded you can be, oh well takes all sorts.
In the above thread about climate change you spend post after post making vague unverifiable claims; not once did you post any sources or list a single specific fact about anything. When this trait about you was pointed out, you just dipped and never returned to the thread.
Even on this thread you don't make a single point using a fact that can be verified; more vague ideological nonsense.
If you're going to criticize someone's ability to think first demonstrate that you can do so yourself. Start using verifiable facts supported with sources rather than vague BS that you obviously read from right-wing Facebook posts.
@vivify saidI made a point about compelled speech, was called out as fake news, I show a clip to "prove" it is not fake news. The clips is not watched/believed because of a preconceived notion, about someone that, is, in my summation, somewhat Arrogant in his manner, I get that, but he is Honest to a fault. I am happy to have you disagree with what he says, but to dismiss him offhand is silliness. It is like, you do not like what I say, so, by default, I am a liar. Sorry, but I pride myself on being honest. I agree that I can get things wrong but I do not lie. ( mostly anyways ) My concern as to weather or not you believe me is rather small, but it would be nice.
Thread 197249
In the above thread about climate change you spend post after post making vague unverifiable claims; not once did you post any sources or list a single specific fact about anything. When this trait about you was pointed out, you just dipped and never returned to the thread.
Even on this thread you don't make a single point using a fact that ...[text shortened]... supported with sources rather than vague BS that you obviously read from right-wing Facebook posts.
I will not, with intent at least, ever call someone a liar. It is just not done, but I will call out silliness, at least what I see as silliness.
The climate change stuff rather gets to the point that, it seems, that people will believe what they want to believe, You think I am a blind Ignoramus, I am fine with that. I think the same about you. It gets to the point sometimes that who cares. I hope you don't care what I think, I certainly do not care what you think. And the science stuff, sigh over it. My feeds are all about stuff proving you wrong, I am NOT going to bother pointing anything out because the second you do not trust the " source ", all over red rover. you see, you will not " let " anyone prove their point.
I tried using a leftist source to prove mine, but you dismiss it offhandedly, telling me that the debate is falling on ears that are not listening.
Anyway, have a nice day, BTW, Life as we know it is ending soon, trust the science, so enjoy life while you can. Joking, ok.
1 edit
@jimmac saidYour clip is not "fake news" because it's not even news. It's just the opinion of a notorious right-winger. If you can't differentiate between news and someone stating their opinion, I'm not surprised.
I made a point about compelled speech, was called out as fake news, I show a clip to "prove" it is not fake news.
I tried using a leftist source to prove mine, but you dismiss it offhandedly, telling me that the debate is falling on ears that are not listening.
a) When did I ever do that?
b) Just because a news source is "leftist" that doesn't mean it's valid. What matters is whether the information is accurately presented.
@jimmac saidMost people and you must be wrong then.
The term Dysphoria means " made up ". To most people anyways. OK, I do not believe I am what I am, type of thing. You are making it up and have the audacity to call it " science "
Dysphoria is a mental condition. And there are various forms of it. It falls under the obsessive-compulsive spectrum.
What you're probably referring to is gender incongruence.
But then again, you think Jordan Peterson is worth watching, so you could mean any old claptrap.