11 Sep '10 12:39>
Originally posted by bbarrI doubt you impress anyone although you try so hard to do so.
And to get women. Philosophy was invented to impress women at cocktail parties.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraSurely time as a dimension (which has been proven) establishes determinism?
For this question to have any relevance you must first establish that the universe is in fact deterministic.
Originally posted by utherpendragonInteresting notion...who has made the fewest moves per page of posts?
LOL good one!🙂
But, do you realize I have made 87,261 moves more than you?
Wait let me guess before you say it..quality over quantity!🙂
Originally posted by shavixmirWhat do you mean by "time as a dimension [being] proven" and how does that imply determinism?
Surely time as a dimension (which has been proven) establishes determinism?
We just don't experience it that way (as we experience time going from A to B).
Originally posted by rwingettI have 3.27 moves per page, so I "win" the not-playing-chess-on-a-chess-site game.
Interesting notion...who has made the fewest moves per page of posts?
You've made 103,370 moves against 255 pages of posts. 405 moves per page.
Bbarr has made 16,100 moves against 498 pages, or 32 moves per page.
I've made 21,474 moves against 696 pages, or 31 moves per page.
Palynka, on the other hand, has made a mere 8,623 moves against a staggerin ...[text shortened]... 1,606 pages of posts. That comes out to 5.37 moves per page of posts.
Can anyone top that?
Originally posted by shavixmirOn the contrary, time might disprove determinism.
Surely time as a dimension (which has been proven) establishes determinism?
We just don't experience it that way (as we experience time going from A to B).
Originally posted by KazetNagorraTrue, but Palynka's been doing it for six years. It remains to be seen whether your stamina can match his over the long haul.
I have 3.27 moves per page, so I "win" the not-playing-chess-on-a-chess-site game.
Originally posted by lucifershammerYou do realize that "all possible universes" include the case here M shoots them both but one of the the bullet hits 1mm away from the one in the baseline case, or 0.1mm or 0.0000000000000000000000001mm...
A concrete example. Something like, "M/M' is a husband who walks in on his wife and best friend having an affair. In U, M picks up his shotgun and shoots them both; in U', M' just walks out the door. M and M' have identical histories, genetic codes etc. till that point - they are 'arbitrarily close' in every relevant way."
To give you advance warni ...[text shortened]... cant enough (possibly even to say that M and M' aren't even the same moral agent).
Originally posted by rwingettAnd 6 years of posts filled with pure unadultered truth. You don't know how priviliged you are to have the opportunity to read my posts.
True, but Palynka's been doing it for six years. It remains to be seen whether your stamina can match his over the long haul.
Edit: I guess 489 pages of posts in less than two years is a staggering total.
Originally posted by PalynkaYou're in three clans, O truthful one. How is it that you've made so few moves? Do you just cheer them on?
And 6 years of posts filled with pure unadultered truth. You don't know how priviliged you are to have the opportunity to read my posts.
Now bow down to me.