Originally posted by scottishinnzWhat a load of crap.
Creationists believe that gazelle exist merely to feed lions. They jump willingly into the lions open mouths.
Go and check out the creation website and see what they are about.
They can actually back up their theories that parts of the bible did exist,not like evolutionists that are still searching for that missing link.
I am not a creationist, and was taught from young about evolution,but as you research the subject of evolution you can not seem to find any hard evidence of the evolution theory.
Who is right i do not know but people are going to believe what they want to believe ,no matter what evidence is presented.
Originally posted by boarmanDo you know what a scientific theory is?
What a load of crap.
Go and check out the creation website and see what they are about.
They can actually back up their theories that parts of the bible did exist,not like evolutionists that are still searching for that missing link.
I am not a creationist, and was taught from young about evolution,but as you research the subject of evolution you can ...[text shortened]... but people are going to believe what they want to believe ,no matter what evidence is presented.
Originally posted by XanthosNZI still have not seen any hard physical evidence of the evolution theory.There are scientific theories but they still lack the physical proof.Anyone can give a theory,whether it is right or wrong you cannot say unless you have proof to support your theory/theories.
I was thinking more of the general definition.
Originally posted by boarmanThe reason that I ask for the definition is because to qualify to be a scientific theory it has to fit all the current evidence available and be disprovable. So the existance of God cannot be a scientific theory because it cannot be disproved.
I still have not seen any hard physical evidence of the evolution theory.There are scientific theories but they still lack the physical proof.Anyone can give a theory,whether it is right or wrong you cannot say unless you have proof to support your theory/theories.
Originally posted by XanthosNZI never said that the existence of God was based on any scientific theory,i said creationists have given theories to suggest parts of the bible were true.
The reason that I ask for the definition is because to qualify to be a scientific theory it has to fit all the current evidence available and be disprovable. So the existance of God cannot be a scientific theory because it cannot be disproved.
I also cannot see where i said that God existed.
Originally posted by boarmanI was using the existance of God as an unrelated example. So if these creationists have theories that suggest the Bible is literal in parts then they need to find the evidence to support their theory.
I never said that the existence of God was based on any scientific theory,i said creationists have given theories to suggest parts of the bible were true.
I also cannot see where i said that God existed.
Originally posted by XanthosNZTake a look at the creation site ,it might offer some explanations for you as it did for me.I am still not totally convinced but some of these theories seem plausible.
I was using the existance of God as an unrelated example. So if these creationists have theories that suggest the Bible is literal in parts then they need to find the evidence to support their theory.
Originally posted by boarmanAre you going to link me to answersingenesis? If so please just get out. We don't want retards cluttering up the forums. Seriously, anyone witha half a brain can come up with theories that sound plausible to people with no understanding of science.
Take a look at the creation site ,it might offer some explanations for you as it did for me.I am still not totally convinced but some of these theories seem plausible.
Originally posted by XanthosNZNo its not the answersingenesis site but one of the other creation sites ,i will find you which site it is.
Are you going to link me to answersingenesis? If so please just get out. We don't want retards cluttering up the forums. Seriously, anyone witha half a brain can come up with theories that sound plausible to people with no understanding of science.