In the five years since Sep 9-11, I have heard every conspiracy (including a few I have entertained myself) and regardless of whom you would blame or who you would consider to have gained the most out of the ashes of the wreckage that was the twisted metal of the former twin towers, I think we need to remember the victims and divorce the politics of the moment from the situation.
Is this at all possible? Or will the desire to blame an...
'other'.....bring its own demons and encourage people to dismiss the lifestyle of all adherents of Islam, without having a notion or understanding of the scale of personal tradgedy enacted on that day.
Originally posted by JeeAmerika was the light of democracy and now it is a mockery.
nice touch.
and if you still have some tears, use some for the 4500 killed on 11 september 1973, when Kissinger order the CIA to get rid of the democraticaly elected Allende to put Pinochet in charge.
And a lot more were to come
Originally posted by kmax87From the responses above to your post I think the answer is no. We cannot show compasion for the victims of 9/11. After all, they were all a bunch of fasceist, imperialistic scum that had it coming to them, or at least thats the impression I am getting from others on this forum. Hate, therefore, justifies more hate.
In the five years since Sep 9-11, I have heard every conspiracy (including a few I have entertained myself) and regardless of whom you would blame or who you would consider to have gained the most out of the ashes of the wreckage that was the twisted metal of the former twin towers, I think we need to remember the victims and divorce the politics of the momen ...[text shortened]... ithout having a notion or understanding of the scale of personal tradgedy enacted on that day.
Well actually no. Hitler managed 5 years of war thanks of the iron and petrol of US that they trade for the money they steal from jews and others. At some stage Nazi weren't able to pay anymore, so they send american kids to die here while they bomb useless target in order to be paid to rebuild them.
In 1940 Germany was unarmed (Versailles treaty) and bankrupt (since 1933, hence Hitler and his blaming-the-jew strategy).
Do you have history classes over there?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html
Like funding the Taliban and then playing the King of freedom and Democratie by bombing Afganistan.
Without US, Hitler's regime won't have last a year.
Ask Rockfeller and Granpa Bush, if you want to check some bank account between 1940 and 1945.
Then the good american "offer" the Marshal plan that EU finish to pay back around 10 years ago only! 1945-1995: Imagine the interest on it.
- Joined
- 02 Feb 06
- Moves
- 123634
Originally posted by JeeYeah we do have history classes. For instance we learn that Germany could not have possibly been unarmed in 1940 since they had already invaded Poland in September of 1939!!
In 1940 Germany was unarmed (Versailles treaty) and bankrupt (since 1933, hence Hitler and his blaming-the-jew strategy).
Do you have history classes over there?
But I do give you credit for originality. I've not heard anyone try to blame the US for Germany's war making ability in WWII until today. So I applaud you for being even more whacked out then the average idiot that posts here.