@metal-brain saidOf course. Google decides what you will know. Your knowledge and ignorance determine who you vote for.
Google can influence who you vote for.
https://rumble.com/v3dzcrq-september-1-2023.html
@EintaluJ
More so than most people know. The democrats think republicans are trying to overthrow our democracy and big tech is doing the exact opposite.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/09/13/google-big-tech-bias-hurts-democracy-not-just-conservatives-column/1265020002/
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/epstein-testimony
@metal-brain saidi would say it's still better than burning millions of dollars to bombard the elderly with adds on tv
Google can influence who you vote for.
https://rumble.com/v3dzcrq-september-1-2023.html
with google i can find Marianne Williamson interviews even if i have to put in a minimal effort. mainstream media won't even have her on
So yeah, another instance of you making a mountain out of a molehill and getting worked up about the wrong thing
@zahlanzi saidYou don't need google.
i would say it's still better than burning millions of dollars to bombard the elderly with adds on tv
with google i can find Marianne Williamson interviews even if i have to put in a minimal effort. mainstream media won't even have her on
So yeah, another instance of you making a mountain out of a molehill and getting worked up about the wrong thing
https://brave.com/category/private-search-engine/
And you obviously did not watch the kim Iversen Show video I posted. It is obvious you don't know enough about this to get worked up like you should. Do you always post nonsense about things you know nothing about? This is no molehill and you seem to think you don't have a choice between search engines.
Indeed. This is a reason I know that liberals will win in the end...You are EVERYWHERE. Add to that that you are the party of illegals, and we (the USA) are doomed.
In terms of motive, Google is renowned for its liberal bias. You can see that in political donations by employees of Google, YouTube, and other subsidiaries of parent company Alphabet which went 94 percent to Democrats in 2016. Hillary Clinton's largest donor was Google/Alphabet.May 24, 2023
@averagejoe1 saidYep, but democrats think Trump is the threat to democracy. Do you see how they always do the bait and switch thing? While sonhouse was screaming about how Trump would destroy democracy it was happening right under their noses and had no idea, but since Google favors democrats the democrats will predictably condone it. Their election meddling is for a good cause. That is how they think.
Indeed. This is a reason I know that liberals will win in the end...You are EVERYWHERE. Add to that that you are the party of illegals, and we (the USA) are doomed.
In terms of motive, Google is renowned for its liberal bias. You can see that in political donations by employees of Google, YouTube, and other subsidiaries of parent company Alphabet which went 94 percent to Democrats in 2016. Hillary Clinton's largest donor was Google/Alphabet.May 24, 2023
@metal-brain saidSonhouse has NEVER dealt with this problem like a adult on the Forum. He ignores even the simplest Dem asssault on democracy, the regulation of our kitchen applliances, ceiling fans, light bulbs, cars, the list goes on. Total exercise of authoritarian power. How 'bout it SHouse?
Yep, but democrats think Trump is the threat to democracy. Do you see how they always do the bait and switch thing? While sonhouse was screaming about how Trump would destroy democracy it was happening right under their noses and had no idea, but since Google favors democrats the democrats will predictably condone it. Their election meddling is for a good cause. That is how they think.
@metal-brain saidWhat about youtube, twitter, facebook etc. Many places influence election results.
Google can influence who you vote for.
https://rumble.com/v3dzcrq-september-1-2023.html
@eqtoptrader saidCorrect, tech companies in general favor Dems, not just Google. This includes Twitter, prior to this year.
What about youtube, twitter, facebook etc. Many places influence election results.
There should be congressional oversite to ensure search engines have non-biased practices based on objective criteria.
@vivify saidIf a tech company wishes to support a political party it should be their prerogative. It is no different to an individual setting up an election sign on their property for a political party that best suits themselves.
Correct, tech companies in general favor Dems, not just Google. This includes Twitter, prior to this year.
There should be congressional oversite to ensure search engines have non-biased practices based on objective criteria.
@eqtoptrader saidI agree. What I'm referring to is their making sure public tools used to gather information is objective, like search engines. Google as a company can support anyone they want but their search engines should always remain objective.
If a tech company wishes to support a political party it should be their prerogative.
@vivify saidNo, you suggest regulation by government. Putin does that. Brrrr
Correct, tech companies in general favor Dems, not just Google. This includes Twitter, prior to this year.
There should be congressional oversite to ensure search engines have non-biased practices based on objective criteria.
I have an idea, why not everhyone make up their own minds, Trump warned us about FAKE NEWS, so how bout the govt print something everyday for us all to make up our own minds.
Yu see, your idea would lead to govt actually DECIDING......oh, never mind, I forget I am talking to a screaming liberal. Loving them nanny rules, are you? Wash your hands before supper!!!!!
You people. You are blind. And, other things. How are things going with free housing, by the way.?
@eqtoptrader saidAgreed. Google owns youtube so no surprise there. Twitter was replaced by X and seems a little better than it was before Musk bought it. Facebook is really bad too, but too big to fail it looks like.
What about youtube, twitter, facebook etc. Many places influence election results.
What Google was doing is illegal. They should have been prosecuted.