1 edit
@earl-of-trumps saidFOX is all we have.
Google SUCKS. they really fooking SUCK
And figuring they got in trouble before, you best know they will keep their noses clean from now on.
Go FOX, what is the NEWS!!!??
Oh, and Breitbart.
@metal-brain said"Wikipedia is a misinformation website run by the CIA."
@Zahlanzi
Her sudden departure comes just a day after the vocal vaccine skeptic publicly groused about a recent Rising episode featuring chief White House medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci, adding that she “wanted to be a part of this interview” and it was “a shame I wasn’t able to be there to get the answers we all deserve.”
Iversen has been a fierce critic of Fauc ...[text shortened]... ---------------------------------------------
Wikipedia is a misinformation website run by the CIA.
😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆
🙄 🙄
@averagejoe1 saidSCOTUS was corrupted years ago. The owners of corporations can fund campaigns. Those are people, not corporations.
SCOTUS deemed corps to be people years ago. They can support anyone they want to. Don't get you there. And, so what? So Cocacola supports Biden or Trump. So what? What is the big deal? What are you fellers so caught up in. All of you should get a life.
@Metal-Brain
They are the same people.
Myself, I do not get involved with D. C. So guess what?
They are not in my world either.
It makes life so much better.
I believe they have made it a law that all news can now only broadcast or print "good" or "positive", news.
Anything that reflects "goodness" is all that is allowed.
& If there is any negativity, there is strick punishments for any violations of this with up to 100 years in prison & $100,000 or both for simply mentioning any negativity what's so ever.
I might start watching the news now.
Peace be with you,
S.L.K.
@shavixmir saidYeah, stupid people like you wanting to subvert democracy in the name of saving it.
People being stupid is the threat to democracy.
You support the court preventing Trump from getting another term instead of the American people. You want it decided by a minority instead of a majority.
You have nothing but contempt for democracy.
@eqtoptrader saidBack again?
If a tech company wishes to support a political party it should be their prerogative. It is no different to an individual setting up an election sign on their property for a political party that best suits themselves.
@metal-brain saidNot until Trump got three picks. Not until Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
SCOTUS was corrupted years ago. The owners of corporations can fund campaigns. Those are people, not corporations.
@averagejoe1 saidYour rambling again Joe and not following the tread I’m just pinging the fascist hypocrisy of MB being happy about tech companies on your side but dare one be on the dems or liberals side and it’s the end of democracy.
So if I am your eighbor and support Raph Nader or Harold Smit or Trump or Kamala, that is a 'threat' to you??
BTW, Avjoe considers the word 'threat' to be of faerie persuasion. "i'm threeeaaaaaaaattend".
That’s if you even believe MBs stupid opinion
@suzianne saidCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission was in 2010 before Trump got 3 picks. You contradicted yourself.
Not until Trump got three picks. Not until Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
All presidents in recent history have been corrupt and they all pick corrupt SCOTUS judges. Even Carter took orders from David Rockefeller. If not they will end up like JFK and RFK. Who do you think told Carter to allow the Shah of Iran to live in exile in the USA? David Rockefeller.
@metal-brain saidWhat was wrong with the head of a puppet regime of the west getting sanctuary in the west?
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was in 2010 before Trump got 3 picks. You contradicted yourself.
All presidents in recent history have been corrupt and they all pick corrupt SCOTUS judges. Even Carter took orders from David Rockefeller. If not they will end up like JFK and RFK. Who do you think told Carter to allow the Shah of Iran to live in exile in the USA? David Rockefeller.
I guess you prefer the current little girl raping and murdering psychotic theocracy that’s running the show now.
@vivify saidSo not directing people to bat 💩 crazy conspiracies and outright partisan lies is somehow partisan rather than a money making business model.
Correct, tech companies in general favor Dems, not just Google. This includes Twitter, prior to this year.
There should be congressional oversite to ensure search engines have non-biased practices based on objective criteria.
All voices are not equal and there is a thing called the factual truth, or at least the closest approximation of it, if you find yourself at odds with the general consensus it’s not the job of your search engine to recreate your world view for you.