Go back
Hallucinogenic Tea

Hallucinogenic Tea

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Religion smigion. Should this be allowed? I think not.

From Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday it would decide whether the federal government must allow the U.S. branch of a Brazilian-based religion to import a hallucinogenic tea for use as a sacrament.

The high court agreed to review a U.S. appeals court ruling that said the government could not prohibit the sacramental use of the tea because of a 1993 religious freedom law.

The U.S. Justice Department said that under the ruling the government must allow the importation and possession of hoasca tea for religious services, even though it contains an illegal, controlled substance that can be potentially dangerous.

Members of the religion, O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal, believe the tea is sacred and that using it connects them to God. The tea is made from two plants that grow in the Amazon.

Founded in Brazil in 1961, the religion practices a blend of Christian theology and indigenous South American beliefs. It has about 8,000 members in Brazil.

In 1993, its leader set up a branch in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and it has about 130 followers in the United States.

In 1999, U.S. Customs inspectors intercepted a shipment from Brazil to the American branch of three drums labeled "tea extract." U.S. agents then seized 30 gallons (136 liters) of the tea from the home of Jeffrey Bronfman, the head of the church's U.S. chapter.

The tea contains dimethyltryptamine, or DMT, a controlled substance. The government said it had a high potential for abuse and was unsafe for use even under medical supervision, but attorneys for the religion said experts testified that sacramental use of the tea caused no harm.

The U.S. branch, Bronfman and several other members sued and sought an injunction to prevent the federal government from seizing the tea and to allow its importation and use in religious ceremonies.

Acting Solicitor General Paul Clement of the Justice Department appealed to the Supreme Court after the government lost before the appeals court.

"The ... decision has mandated that the federal government open the nation's borders to the importation, circulation and usage of a mind-altering hallucinogen and threatens to inflict irreparable harm on international cooperation in combating transnational narcotics trafficking," he said.

Attorneys for the religion and its members urged the Supreme Court to deny the appeal. They said DMT was readily available in the United States from many sources, including grasses the government recommends to control roadside erosion.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case and then issue a decision during its upcoming term that begins in October.

Vote Up
Vote Down

"Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal"
πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Paulie
Religion smigion. Should this be allowed? I think not.

From Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday it would decide whether the federal government must allow the U.S. branch of a Brazilian-based religion to import a hallucinogenic tea for use as a sacrament.

The high court agreed to review a U.S. appeals court ruling that s ...[text shortened]... arguments in the case and then issue a decision during its upcoming term that begins in October.
Who cares what people take? What happened to the inalienable rights to liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Who cares what people take? What happened to the inalienable rights to liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
I don`t personally care what other people take, so long as it doesn`t have any effect on me or my family.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Paulie


The U.S. Justice Department said that under the ruling the government must allow the importation and possession of hoasca tea for religious services, even though it contains an illegal, controlled substance that can be potentially dangerous.
God forbid the government should allow the American public, who between them own 80000000 guns, to posess anything that could be potentially dangerous.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Skorj
God forbid the government should allow the American public, who between them own 80000000 guns, to posess anything that could be potentially dangerous.
Like cars, and fire-works, and skateboards, and knives...

There should also be laws against running with scissors!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Paulie
Religion smigion. Should this be allowed? I think not.

From Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday it would decide whether the federal government must allow the U.S. branch of a Brazilian-based religion to import a hallucinogenic tea for use as a sacrament.

The high court agreed to review a U.S. appeals court ruling that s ...[text shortened]... arguments in the case and then issue a decision during its upcoming term that begins in October.
Another example of multiculturalism run amok...these knuckleheads want to drink tea, give 'em lipton..or a one-way ticket back to Brazil....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Who cares what people take? What happened to the inalienable rights to liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
Yeah, tell that to the families of meth heads and crack heads...oh, and don't forget heroin addicts.....πŸ™„

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Paulie
I don`t personally care what other people take, so long as it doesn`t have any effect on me or my family.
It will have an effect on you and your family, and country for that matter, if enough fools become adicted to it...ever have a meth head or crack head steal from you in order to get a "fix"?...no?....well, it will happen in due time....unless you're lucky...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Skorj
God forbid the government should allow the American public, who between them own 80000000 guns, to posess anything that could be potentially dangerous.
Guns aren't dangerous, Moose are; don't they teach you Canucks anything in school? 😲 πŸ™„

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Coletti
Like cars, and fire-works, and skateboards, and knives...

There should also be laws against running with scissors!
Yeah, and with those 8000000 guns and a rack of Budskis per head, wont the chinese have a ball trying to occupy this party😡

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chancremechanic
Guns aren't dangerous, Moose are; don't they teach you Canucks anything in school? 😲 πŸ™„
I said potentially dangerous. As long as we keep 'em locked up where the moose can't get at 'em everything's okay.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Skorj
I said potentially dangerous. As long as we keep 'em locked up where the moose can't get at 'em everything's okay.
Register those guns! Remember: guns don't kill people, bureaucrats kill people

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
Register those guns! Remember: guns don't kill people, bureaucrats kill people
These guys are all making me want to get a gun and some tea.

ES

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chancremechanic
Yeah, tell that to the families of meth heads and crack heads...oh, and don't forget heroin addicts.....πŸ™„
The families of people do not have the right to tell those people via legislation what they can or can't do.

Regarding people stealing to get a fix...well, prosecute them for the theft.