Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 22 Oct '16 23:07 / 1 edit
    http://truepundit.com/pentagon-hillary-clinton-should-be-arrested-for-leaking-top-secret-nuclear-intelligence-on-national-tv/

    Hillary Clinton divulged Top Secret nuclear security intelligence to tens of millions of worldwide television audience viewers Wednesday night during the third presidential debate, according to high-ranking Department of Defense personnel.

    Clinton, responding to opponent Donald Trump and a question posed by debate moderator Chris Wallace, boasted specific and “damaging” details about the United States’ nuclear response time to retaliate during a nuclear attack. Clinton said:

    “But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.” –Hillary Clinton, National TV Appearance

    “Secretary Clinton proved tonight she is unfit to be commander-in-chief,” a top-ranking DOD intelligence source said. “What she did compromises our national security. She is cavalier and reckless and in my opinion should be detained and questioned so we can unravel why she did what she did.”

    According to Pentagon sources, the information Clinton disseminated publicly is Top Secret intelligence governed under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP) which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The specific details of the country’s nuclear response time discussed by Clinton, sources said, are only known by a handful of individuals outside top military brass, including the following “need-to-know” (NTK) officials:

    President
    Vice President
    Secretary of State
    Secretary of Defense
    Secretary of Homeland Security
    Attorney General
    Director of National Intelligence
    CIA Director
    Deputy Secretary of State
    Deputy Secretary of Defense
    Special personnel designated solely by the President in writing
    Sources said late Wednesday Clinton likely violated two different types of Dept. of Defense SAP protocols. Since nuclear response is part of the sensitive national plan for nuclear war operations, all of its schematics are covered under both “Intelligence SAPs” and “Operation and Support SAPs,” sources said. Both contain Top Secret information.

    “Targeting options by ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missiles), air or sea, launch order, launch procedures and response are some of the most secretly guarded tenets of national security and nuclear war policy,” a Pentagon source said. “It’s truly incredible that (nuclear) response time as part of an ERO (Emergency Response Option) is now out there in the public domain to our adversaries.”

    U.S. Defense sources said according to developed U.S. counterintelligence, military officials in China, North Korea, Syria, Russia, Iran and even actors like ISIS had no previous definitive intelligence to determine the U.S. nuclear response time, especially during an ERO, prior to Clinton’s admission Wednesday night. Sources reluctantly acknowledged her calculations were accurate.

    “Any time frame calculated would have merely been an educated hypothesis, absent leaked documents and there have been no such breaches,” the DOD source said.

    Clinton has come under fire time and time again for mishandling national security secrets via email, telephone and secure facsimile during and after her tenure as secretary of state. Her mishandling of classified and top secret intelligence sparked a year-long investigation by the FBI and various Congressional committees which continue to examine Clinton’s lackluster security controls with and attitude toward protecting some of the nation’s most sensitive data which she stored on an unprotected home server in the basement of her Chappaqua, New York home during her post at Foggy Bottom.

    Clinton, just this week, unleashed a series of campaign ads painting Trump as a loose cannon who should never be in control of nuclear secrets and weapons. Clinton trumpeted the seemingly ill-timed ads Wednesday night at the debate prior to her rant divulging nuclear secrets herself.
  2. Subscriber Suzianne
    Misfit Queen
    22 Oct '16 23:25 / 2 edits
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://truepundit.com/pentagon-hillary-clinton-should-be-arrested-for-leaking-top-secret-nuclear-intelligence-on-national-tv/

    Hillary Clinton divulged Top Secret nuclear security intelligence to tens of millions of worldwide television audience viewers Wednesday night during the third presidential debate, according to high-ranking Department of Defense per ...[text shortened]... ill-timed ads Wednesday night at the debate prior to her rant divulging nuclear secrets herself.
    Do you really think that whoever might look to exploit this info didn't already know it?

    Really?

    Pentagon officials who verify this info should probably be questioned as to why they divulged information. The Pentagon could have kept their trap shut and left people wondering if it was true. "High ranking Department of Defense personnel". Well, there is a reason why they didn't give their names, I suppose. It's called treason. Idiots.

    It's great to know that people are so eager to find her "guilty" of anything that they even give up state secrets. Fantastic.
  3. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    22 Oct '16 23:38
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    Do you really think that whoever might look to exploit this info didn't already know it?

    Really?

    Pentagon officials who verify this info should probably be questioned as to why they divulged information. The Pentagon could have kept their trap shut and left people wondering if it was true. "High ranking Department of Defense personnel" ...[text shortened]... eager to find her "guilty" of anything that they even give up state secrets. Fantastic.
    Your "logic" sucks ass.
  4. Standard member sonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    22 Oct '16 23:52
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    Your "logic" sucks ass.
    Says the dude who thinks Earth is flat. Great cred there.
  5. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    23 Oct '16 00:06
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Says the dude who thinks Earth is flat. Great cred there.
    Says the guy who believes the world is a sphere, but cannot prove it with anything remotely resembling objective evidence.
    Crap cred there.
  6. 23 Oct '16 00:17 / 2 edits
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://truepundit.com/pentagon-hillary-clinton-should-be-arrested-for-leaking-top-secret-nuclear-intelligence-on-national-tv/

    Hillary Clinton divulged Top Secret nuclear security intelligence to tens of millions of worldwide television audience viewers Wednesday night during the third presidential debate, according to high-ranking Department of Defense per ...[text shortened]... ill-timed ads Wednesday night at the debate prior to her rant divulging nuclear secrets herself.
    Maybe she lied about the timing, for the purpose of national security. Has anybody considered the possibility that drills show it takes a different and variable amount of time? Has anybody considered that no other nation will buy this statement of hers?

    Nobody can affirm that she divulged a Top Secret without access to the secret.
  7. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    23 Oct '16 00:19
    Originally posted by JS357
    Maybe she lied about the timing, for the purpose of national security. Has anybody considered the possibility that drills show it takes a different and variable amount of time? Has anybody considered that no other nation will buy this statement of hers?
    Has that crook done ANYTHING in support for the US?
  8. 23 Oct '16 00:27
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    Has that crook done ANYTHING in support for the US?
    I edited while you responded but the idea is the same.

    Like any politician, she will support the US when doing so is supportive of her interests.
  9. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    23 Oct '16 01:49
    Originally posted by JS357
    I edited while you responded but the idea is the same.

    Like any politician, she will support the US when doing so is supportive of her interests.
    True, that.
    She is the "hero" we deserve.
  10. Standard member lemon lime
    blah blah blah
    23 Oct '16 03:22 / 2 edits
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    Do you really think that whoever might look to exploit this info didn't already know it?

    Really?

    Pentagon officials who verify this info should probably be questioned as to why they divulged information. The Pentagon could have kept their trap shut and left people wondering if it was true. "High ranking Department of Defense personnel" ...[text shortened]... eager to find her "guilty" of anything that they even give up state secrets. Fantastic.
    Once a secret is divulged it is no longer a secret. Clinton was in a position to know because she had been Secretary of State, so no one has any reason to question the accuracy of that information. The bottom line is the information was accurate, and her reputation for carelessness has once again been reafirmed.

    It's ironic that in her argument for why Trump can't be trusted she has proven why she can't be trusted.
  11. 23 Oct '16 03:52
    Originally posted by lemon lime
    Once a secret is divulged it is no longer a secret. Clinton was in a position to know because she had been Secretary of State, so no one has any reason to question the accuracy of that information. The bottom line is the information was accurate, and her reputation for carelessness has once again been reafirmed.

    It's ironic that in her argument for why Trump can't be trusted she has proven why she can't be trusted.
    You do realize you are probably talking to an Obamabot, or Hillarybot, right?
  12. Standard member lemon lime
    blah blah blah
    23 Oct '16 05:18
    Originally posted by whodey
    You do realize you are probably talking to an Obamabot, or Hillarybot, right?
    I realise emotions run high during an election cycle and reason often takes a back seat, so I figure why fight it... I'll be a backseat driver.
  13. Standard member shavixmir
    Guppy poo
    23 Oct '16 05:33
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    Says the guy who believes the world is a sphere, but cannot prove it with anything remotely resembling objective evidence.
    Crap cred there.
    Omg... if you fly far enough West, you end up back home from the East...

    You really believe the planet is flat???
    You FFing Christian trailer trash.

    Haha
  14. 23 Oct '16 05:34
    Originally posted by shavixmir
    Omg... if you fly far enough West, you end up back home from the East...

    You really believe the planet is flat???
    You FFing Christian trailer trash.

    Haha
    If Hilary has anymore brain clots she might be saying the same thing.

    Now back to the topic at hand Shav.

    Anything to say about it?
  15. Standard member shavixmir
    Guppy poo
    23 Oct '16 06:18
    Originally posted by whodey
    If Hilary has anymore brain clots she might be saying the same thing.

    Now back to the topic at hand Shav.

    Anything to say about it?
    Nope. Couldn't care less.
    It's not a State secret, it's useless information and it could just as well be false or changed every few weeks.

    Really pointless to discuss.
    You and Trump are fishing for anything to make the woman look like a danger. Waste of time. She's just as dangerous as every single professional politician out there.

    Why not accuse her of leaking information to aliens whilst having anal sex without lubrucant with Lucifer?
    Go whole hog. Go for it man.