Originally posted by HarrisonBergeron People with hobbies other than internet forum trolling.
There can be no doubt that the Venn diagram depicting Internet trolls as one set and Hobby Lobby lubbers as another will have a not inconsiderable overlap between the twain. Ergo, your assertion is false.
Originally posted by no1marauder Not having enough money?
I hate to break it to you, but there is a Constitutional right to having an abortion.
Wait, what?
Surely you're not suggesting that a) there is a constitutional right to have enough money for an abortion, nor b) a constitutional right to have someone else pay for your abortion.
Surely you're not suggesting that a) there is a constitutional right to have enough money for an abortion, nor b) a constitutional right to have someone else pay for your abortion.
Or are you?
What did you get Eladaritis?
Read the post I was responding to and THEN read mine.
In case that's too hard, he asked two questions and I answered both accurately. Neither answer leads to either position you (but not me) stated.
Originally posted by Eladar Where does the Constitution state you have the right to something you can't afford?
In the same place it says corporations have rights.
To be more precise, you have a right to privacy that encompasses the right as to whether to terminate a pregnancy or not before the fetus' viability. I guess corporations have that right now, too.
Originally posted by Eladar The people who own the Corporations have rights.
I ask again, where does the Constitution give you rights to what you can't afford.
That's not what the SCOTUS has been saying; they are saying the corporation itself has rights.
Your second sentence is incoherent; your possession of a right has nothing to do with whether you can afford it or not. Natural Rights predate money ya know.
EDIT: And to top it off, the Constitution doesn't "give you" any rights at all.