Go back
How old is the Universe?

How old is the Universe?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

I've actually got a serious question about all this.

Yes. The universe is 14 billion years old (much like some Swiss cheeses, by the way).
Yes. The universe is expanding...

And this is what baffles me. If the univese is expanding, then the stars are moving. And they're moving in a coherent direction. So...where are they moving from? Where is this center of the universe?
I once was told there is no center of the universe. But if this is possible, how can the universe be exanding?

All help on this matter (serious fcuking answers please, none of that SPAM or religious crap, thank you very much) is welcome!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
I've actually got a serious question about all this.

Yes. The universe is 14 billion years old (much like some Swiss cheeses, by the way).
Yes. The universe is expanding...

And this is what baffles me. If the univese is expanding, then the stars are moving. And they're moving in a coherent direction. So...where are they moving from? Where is thi ...[text shortened]... us fcuking answers please, none of that SPAM or religious crap, thank you very much) is welcome!
All theorists who support the big bang theory acknowledge there is a centre of the universe.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
I've actually got a serious question about all this.

Yes. The universe is 14 billion years old (much like some Swiss cheeses, by the way).
Yes. The universe is expanding...

And this is what baffles me. If the univese is expanding, then the stars are moving. And they're moving in a coherent direction. So...where are they moving from? Where is thi ...[text shortened]... us fcuking answers please, none of that SPAM or religious crap, thank you very much) is welcome!
galactic central point... we go round every two hundred million years.

well...according to eric idle that is 🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pullhard
All theorists who support the big bang theory acknowledge there is a centre of the universe.
Yeah? So where is it?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wucky3
galactic central point... we go round every two hundred million years.

well...according to eric idle that is 🙄
Yes, shrubberies are my trade. I am a shrubber. My name is Roger the Shrubber. I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies.

Eric said that too!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Yes, shrubberies are my trade. I am a shrubber. My name is Roger the Shrubber. I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies.

Eric said that too!
take a chill pill you plonker!

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wucky3
take a chill pill you plonker!
Meeeoooooooowwwww...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
I've actually got a serious question about all this.

Yes. The universe is 14 billion years old (much like some Swiss cheeses, by the way).
Yes. The universe is expanding...

And this is what baffles me. If the univese is expanding, then the stars are moving. And they're moving in a coherent direction. So...where are they moving from? Where is thi ...[text shortened]... us fcuking answers please, none of that SPAM or religious crap, thank you very much) is welcome!
The universe has been compared to a current bun being cooked.
Where the raisins are stars that move apart from each other as
the bun expands.

Stephen Hawkins considers it more doughnut shaped which would
make sense as a even a bun has a centre.

Maybe if our physicists didn't spend so much time in the pastry shop,
we might have a reasonable answer.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Thequ1ck

Maybe if our physicists didn't spend so much time in the pastry shop,
we might have a reasonable answer.
As you go through life make this your goal,
watch the doughnut not the hole.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow
The whole point of schrodinger's cat was that Erwin Schrodinger was trying to show that this whole thing was ridiculous. He was trying to say that a cat cannot be some mix between a dead state and an alive state until it is observed, that it is one or the other before we see it just as much as after.
I see dead people.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow
The whole point of schrodinger's cat was that Erwin Schrodinger was trying to show that this whole thing was ridiculous. He was trying to say that a cat cannot be some mix between a dead state and an alive state until it is observed, that it is one or the other before we see it just as much as after.
Schrodinger's cat aside.

Did the universe exist before measurement or did it just
probably exist?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Thequ1ck
Schrodinger's cat aside.

Did the universe exist before measurement or did it just
probably exist?
Perhaps there is no "before measurement", just as "after life" makes no sense.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Perhaps there is no "before measurement", just as "after life" makes no sense.
So if we were to humour me and say that our universe exists only
by means of measurements made by conciousness.

How big would this universe be?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Thequ1ck
So if we were to humour me and say that our universe exists only
by means of measurements made by conciousness.

How big would this universe be?
I can't tell you. "Miles & miles & miles of square kilometers" as my geographer teacher said. My guess would be "infinite" though in the sense that there is never a shortage of something to measure, both at the micro & macro levels. Another word for "infinite" is "immeasurable".

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
I can't tell you. "Miles & miles & miles of square kilometers" as my geographer teacher said. My guess would be "infinite" though in the sense that there is never a shortage of something to measure, both at the micro & macro levels. Another word for "infinite" is "immeasurable".
I have heard that the average brain only absorbs a few terabytes
of sensory information in its life time.
If we measured the universe by the total amount of sensory information, ever
processed by consciousness, it would only be in the order of 10^30 bits.

That would make the universe very small indeed.