05 Dec '15 13:32>4 edits
Originally posted by no1marauderWell it would not be stupid (you are a very clever boy to think that up I must say) so much as uneconomic, bizarre and a little bit weird. Wounded Knee in 1890 was the last battle of the Indian Wars. As for the Phillipines, the relevant dates are 1898 - 1891. So it is not terribly difficult to suggest that the army that fought both wars in the same time frame would borrow what it learned from one to apply in the other. I could pull out quotes to hammer home the point - the people of the time had no trouble linking the two - but it is tedious.
I suppose if one were anti-Austrian enough, one could say that the Americans learned such genocidal tactics from Tilly's Imperial Army's sack of Magdeburg in 1631.
But that would be a pretty stupid thing to say, right Finnegan?
Is that really such an "anti American" proposition? Is it Anti American to take the trouble of actually investigating American history and getting the facts right? Or to use American sources in my arguments?
"After its defeat in the Spanish-American War of 1898, Spain ceded its longstanding colony of the Philippines to the United States in the Treaty of Paris. On February 4, 1899, just two days before the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty, fighting broke out between American forces and Filipino nationalists led by Emilio Aguinaldo who sought independence rather than a change in colonial rulers. The ensuing Philippine-American War lasted three years and resulted in the death of over 4,200 American and over 20,000 Filipino combatants. As many as 200,000 Filipino civilians died from violence, famine, and disease." https://history.state.gov/milestones/1899-1913/war
That is from the Anti American source, the US Department of State, of course.
Do you sleep with your flag wrapped around you?