Depends on how you want to use that information, or if the "information" (even if it's likely to be false) suits your cause. Using torture you can get people to say pretty much what you want them to, and if you make it look like a voluntary statement you might try using it to justify any future actions.
So yes, torture sucks *ss
Originally posted by knightwestIt's better then killing children I guess.
The problem you have Gascraft, is that after reading your first post, everyone instantly knows where you want to go with this thread.
So, to humour you, I think torture is wrong, and information received through torture can be unreliable.
Go on, now do your thing. I am looking forward to it.
Originally posted by GascraftYou really are very predictable.......
I realise I am very annoying at the mo, so I'll just make it quick.
What sort of emphasis should be placed on info found through torture?
1) How reliable is it?
2) Should this info be used for important decisions?
Oh yeah.. I'm against torture fullstop..........
Originally posted by GascraftWell he wasn't elected by all of us. I did not vote for him, in fact he got in office through suspect election results. Much like your own president.
So are Americans who have a delusional pres killing, making homeless etc, etc, etc to people in Iraq. It still exist... why?
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundYou have got to love the persuasion power of a Dutch Oven.
I once asked my girlfriend where the remote control was while we sat in bed watching TV. I wanted to watch the wrestling, and she wanted to watch crap chick programs, so i farted and forced her head under the covers.....she told me where the remote was.
WMD my ass.