Go back
Iran is a victim of aggression

Iran is a victim of aggression

Debates


@Metal-Brain said
I will start with Yemen since your hypocrisy is off the charts in regards to that.
The US/Saudi blockade caused countless children to starve to death. That was a genocidal war crime. Everything you said about Yemen applies to the USA. You have it backwards. And Yemen was trying to protect Gazans from genocide so they are not the terrorist, Israel is.

https://abcnews.c ...[text shortened]... e given you the rest of the story are you ready to stop repeating one sided hypocritical propaganda?
One sided hypocritical propaganda?!?!?!
All of this has nothing to do with propaganda. At least everything I just wrote is not propaganda . You guys would bore me out of my mind talking about propaganda. You do not even know the definition of it.. All of the things you have written show no true intent of say Fox News, or MSNBC or any of them. boring. .


@AverageJoe1
Are all of you fellas aware that the Muslims are taking over England. I will do a thread on that in a little bit.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
One sided hypocritical propaganda?!?!?!
All of this has nothing to do with propaganda. At least everything I just wrote is not propaganda . You guys would bore me out of my mind talking about propaganda. You do not even know the definition of it.. All of the things you have written show no true intent of say Fox News, or MSNBC or any of them. boring. .
Everything is one sided with you with the Iran war. An Israeli prime minister tried to ally with Nazi Germany. And he was in a terrorist group called LEHI.

https://socialistworker.org/2012/07/23/tell-the-truth-about-shamir

Sorry to confuse you with facts. But you will have to accept these facts sooner or later. Accept it sooner and save yourself a lot of embarrassment. Israel is a terrorist state. They elected a known terrorist (who attempted to ally with the Nazis) to be their prime minister.


@AverageJoe1 said
Everyone…Hexbolla was founded in 1982.
Next, the Houtis are….something or ‘nother 🤔
Next, Hamas and Israel do not like Iran.

Synopsis of tremendous Pianoman post!!!!!
Hexbolla?? Do you mean Hezbollah?
Houtis?? Do you mean Houthis?

Anyway, glad you liked my post.


@Rajk999 said
Correct. Metal Brain has some rather weird sources of information. One of the most clear indications that Iran supports and maintains terrorists groups all over the world is that they said so clearly. They have no problem admitting it. The Terrorist groups receiving this support, all have no problem admitting that the IRGC finances their operations. Google says:

****** ...[text shortened]... stability or fighting against Western/Israeli influence.
*****************************************
Good to hear a sane voice in this thread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Pianoman1 said
Good to hear a sane voice in this thread.
That is laughable. The USA helped Saddam gas Iran with chemical weapons (WMDs) and also the Kurds.

Now the US is using the Kurds to maybe fight a ground war. Do they not know the USA helped Saddam gas them chemical weapons? The Kurds must be stupid to trust the USA. I guess they are useful idiots.

https://www.institutkurde.org/info/when-our-friend-saddam-was-gassing-the-kurds-1149172158.html

1 edit

@Metal-Brain said
Everything is one sided with you with the Iran war. An Israeli prime minister tried to ally with Nazi Germany. And he was in a terrorist group called LEHI.

https://socialistworker.org/2012/07/23/tell-the-truth-about-shamir

Sorry to confuse you with facts. But you will have to accept these facts sooner or later. Accept it sooner and save yourself a lot of embarrassme ...[text shortened]... e. They elected a known terrorist (who attempted to ally with the Nazis) to be their prime minister.
I did not make myself clear.
The history y’all keep writing about to me is quite irrelevant, I am looking at today, March 8, 2026. Today. Maybe there needs to be a forum specified limited to history. Y’all could type your brains out+ there have been a few books written about history, you could check them out of the library. Now you might say, we learn from history.?!.?? In my opinion, history can learn from Donald Trump. Prior to Trump we had Obama and Clinton Biden and Carter and bush, none of whom did a damn thing. We were at War for these 40 something years with Iran and they sat there and let it all happen. They even went over to Saudi Arabia and bowed to people and apologized to other countries…. that era is over, we might just say maybe because it did not work. Well, Trump is going to work. sorry that sounds like a prediction, that is what you boys do is predict.


@Pianoman1 said
Hexbolla?? Do you mean Hezbollah?
Houtis?? Do you mean Houthis?

Anyway, glad you liked my post.
They are all the same. Many breeds of dogs in the same cage, they are all dogs. Why do we give a wit what they call themselves. Marauder knows a man who wants us to call him a woman. Do you care that that man wants you to call him a woman? Do you care how we spell the name of savages? Do you see how silly all of your liberals are?


@Metal-Brain said
That is laughable. The USA helped Saddam gas Iran with chemical weapons (WMDs) and also the Kurds.

Now the US is using the Kurds to maybe fight a ground war. Do they not know the USA helped Saddam gas them chemical weapons? The Kurds must be stupid to trust the USA. I guess they are useful idiots.

https://www.institutkurde.org/info/when-our-friend-saddam-was-gassing-the-kurds-1149172158.html
This post by MB evidences his penchant to just say things with no basis. Yes the USA was aware of Iraq gassing Iran. …. to prevent an Iranian victory.

I looked up the reasoning, which MB did not, and it we had to stop them from dominating thr Persian gulf countries.

The U.S. strategic reasoning

After the Iranian
1.Iran could dominate the Persian Gulf
•Countries like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia might fall under Iranian influence.
•That region held a large portion of the world’s oil supply.
2.Spread of Iran’s revolutionary regime
•Iran’s leadership called for overthrowing pro-Western governments in the region.
3.Collapse of Iraq
•If Iraq fell, the balance of power in the Middle East could shift dramatically toward Iran.

damn, what great reasoning by President Reagan. Trump would’ve done the same thing. Do you kids not see the picture now ? you see , if Reagan had not allowed that to happen , Irsn would’ve been more powerful. They would influence Saudi Arabia, Iraq would’ve collapsed, and we would be in a whole lot different situation right now.
We would not be in a position to stop Iran, that is for sure , but stop them we did. Thank you Donald Trumpthank you Donald Trump.

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
This post by MB evidences his penchant to just say things with no basis. Yes the USA was aware of Iraq gassing Iran. …. to prevent an Iranian victory.

I looked up the reasoning, which MB did not, and it we had to stop them from dominating thr Persian gulf countries.

The U.S. strategic reasoning

After the Iranian
1.Iran could dominate the Persian Gulf
•Coun ...[text shortened]... to stop Iran, that is for sure , but stop them we did. Thank you Donald Trumpthank you Donald Trump.
Iraq invaded Iran, not the other way around.

Who was turning to "dominate" who?

You really suck at history; don't they have those classes at your high school?


@AverageJoe1 said
This post by MB evidences his penchant to just say things with no basis. Yes the USA was aware of Iraq gassing Iran. …. to prevent an Iranian victory.

I looked up the reasoning, which MB did not, and it we had to stop them from dominating thr Persian gulf countries.

The U.S. strategic reasoning

After the Iranian
1.Iran could dominate the Persian Gulf
•Coun ...[text shortened]... to stop Iran, that is for sure , but stop them we did. Thank you Donald Trumpthank you Donald Trump.
BTW, Reagan sold weapons to Iran during that war to, in his words. "to send a signal that the United States was prepared to replace the animosity between [the U.S. and Iran] with a new relationship. …". https://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/reagan-explains-secret-sale-of-arms-to-iran-nov-13-1986-099742

Mostly it was really to raise money to illegally fund the contras in Nicaragua, but asking a US President to tell the truth about our foreign meddling is a seemingly hopeless dream.


@AverageJoe1 said
I did not make myself clear.
The history y’all keep writing about to me is quite irrelevant, I am looking at today, March 8, 2026. Today. Maybe there needs to be a forum specified limited to history. Y’all could type your brains out+ there have been a few books written about history, you could check them out of the library. Now you might say, we learn from history.?!. ...[text shortened]... Trump is going to work. sorry that sounds like a prediction, that is what you boys do is predict.
Then all that Iran did in the past is irrelevant. Stop calling Iran a state sponsor of terrorism. Everybody supported terrorism in the past.


@AverageJoe1 said
This post by MB evidences his penchant to just say things with no basis. Yes the USA was aware of Iraq gassing Iran. …. to prevent an Iranian victory.

I looked up the reasoning, which MB did not, and it we had to stop them from dominating thr Persian gulf countries.

The U.S. strategic reasoning

After the Iranian
1.Iran could dominate the Persian Gulf
•Coun ...[text shortened]... to stop Iran, that is for sure , but stop them we did. Thank you Donald Trumpthank you Donald Trump.
The USA gave Iran arms to fight Iraq at the same time it was helping Saddam use WMDs on Iran and the Kurds. The USA was arming both sides of that war proving the USA aspired to invade both countries in the end. All of that was reveled with the Iran/Contra investigation.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
Iraq invaded Iran, not the other way around.

Who was turning to "dominate" who?

You really suck at history; don't they have those classes at your high school?
You really suck at debate, only simply confirming with your first sentence what I had written in my post. Iraq made a move to set Iran on its knees. Iraq gassed, they thus invaded. You appear to think that was a BAD IDEA??!!?
You right, Reagan wrong.


@Metal-Brain said
The USA gave Iran arms to fight Iraq at the same time it was helping Saddam use WMDs on Iran and the Kurds. The USA was arming both sides of that war proving the USA aspired to invade both countries in the end. All of that was reveled with the Iran/Contra investigation.
Now you are a war expert?!?! Arming both sides is somehow a no-no??? Hmmmm, I don’t think so. Have you not ever in an election given money to both sides? Commonplace.
Whew.