1 edit
@metal-brain saidYou read far too much Republican recruiting material.
If people want to attack Jackson they should call her a pedophile protector. That would explain why Joe is rewarding her. I wonder if Joe smelled her hair.
Just like you read far too much conspiracy-theory nonsense.
What kind of tool did you use to get your head so far up your ass?
@vivify saidThe point of the question was to find out who this person is. We already know, actually, given her history...We just have to get it in the record. She will reek havoc. The good news is that after she gets in SCOTUS, reeking, our senators will be a bit more selective next time and not pick a person who makes her own law.
Given society's notion of gender has become more fluid, that judge is right: you can't rigidly define it, unless you want strictly biological definitions of sex, which is different from gender.
The point of the question was to eliminate gender identity and leave only the biological definition of sex.
Besides, SCOTUS (with a conservative majority) already ruled trans p ...[text shortened]... ling-on-lgbtq-worker-protections/397f6a41-fa68-420f-bf5e-e80401595ed7/?itid=lk_interstitial_manual_6
@suzianne saidGood morning Suzianne, thoughtful input as usual. Can you tell us what you think about her protection of pedophiles? Check her record on that so that we are all on the same page,,,,that, she indeeds coddles them, for some reason we know not.
You read far too much Republican recruiting material.
Just like you read far too much conspiracy-theory nonsense.
What kind of tool did you use to get your head so far up your ass?
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidYour words are pure propaganda, to disguise your horror of sitting a black woman on the highest court of the land. You should be ashamed of your own behavior, as well as the behavior of the Republicans grilling her for 11 hours a day for two days. But you are not, and for that, the rest of us are ashamed of you.
Good morning Suzianne, thoughtful input as usual. Can you tell us what you think about her protection of pedophiles? Check her record on that so that we are all on the same page,,,,that, she indeeds coddles them, for some reason we know not.
This woman is not only supremely qualified to sit on the bench, but she will be the best Supreme Court Justice since Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Bank on it.
@shavixmir saidcurrent law defines women as…
Because it’s a stupid fukking question.
Cheap baiting tactics and completely pointless.
They’re talking to an intellectual, well educated WOMAN, and their point is this woke thing they’re trying to make an issue out of.
She’s sitting there thinking: are these retards real?
Can you define the term ‘chair’?
The answer is: go to hell retard, I’m not defining words for you, look up a bloody dictionary if you don’t know.
“ All the females of the human species. All such females who have arrived at the age of puberty.”
A person being considered to decide law should know this. Unless of course the person being considered intends to make law, as this person has done before.
A liberals dream,
@suzianne saidwoop dare it is…the race card makes its appearance.
Your words are pure propaganda, to disguise your horror of sitting a black woman on the highest court of the land. You should be ashamed of your own behavior, as well as the behavior of the Republicans grilling her for 11 hours a day for two days. But you are not, and for that, the rest of us are ashamed of you.
This woman is not only supremely qualified to sit on the bench, but she will be the best Supreme Court Justice since Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Bank on it.
@averagejoe1 said"Creature".
I figure she has developed into this creature somewhat recently and they are astounded with her.
Will they install her own water fountain, or can she use the one Clarence Thomas uses?
Racist git.
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidAnd you, Mr. Klansman. You'd wish there was no race card to play. You wish they were all white. How dare a black woman try for a "whites only" job. You tolerate sexual predator Thomas because he kowtows to "the Man".
woop dare it is…the race card makes its appearance.
@mott-the-hoople saidOn the stand, she has said repeatedly that Justices should not speak of politics, only the constitutionality of cases. You lie about her previous service.
current law defines women as…
“ All the females of the human species. All such females who have arrived at the age of puberty.”
A person being considered to decide law should know this. Unless of course the person being considered intends to make law, as this person has done before.
A liberals dream,
She's our dream, and your nightmare.
That says more about you than her.
@suzianne saidthe term woman has a LEGAL DEFINITION…
On the stand, she has said repeatedly that Justices should not speak of politics, only the constitutionality of cases. You lie about her previous service.
She's our dream, and your nightmare.
That says more about you than her.
what do you not understand about that?
@suzianne saidThis has nothing to do with her race. You are no one to be speaking of racism. You are one of the worst racist I have ever seen.
And you, Mr. Klansman. You'd wish there was no race card to play. You wish they were all white. How dare a black woman try for a "whites only" job. You tolerate sexual predator Thomas because he kowtows to "the Man".
@mott-the-hoople saidUnder what statute did you find that definition?
the term woman has a LEGAL DEFINITION…
what do you not understand about that?
Please be specific.