Go back
Judge Jackson: Can't define the term 'woman'

Judge Jackson: Can't define the term 'woman'

Debates

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
This has nothing to do with her race. You are no one to be speaking of racism. You are one of the worst racist I have ever seen.
Hahaha I wish this forum had a zoom option and I could see you blush on that post.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@kevcvs57 said
Hahaha I wish this forum had a zoom option and I could see you blush on that post.
Uhhhh, does Suzianne not interject race into every thread, every issue, every post? Big a big guy,, say, yes, you have a point.
Geez O Petey.
Seems Biden was on to race by announcing in advance that the first requirement ( ignoring having a feel for the constitution) was that his choice would be a black person. What is wrong with these people.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@kevcvs57 said
Hahaha I wish this forum had a zoom option and I could see you blush on that post.
is that how you have sex?

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
What is the end game for you people? Jesus.
Us people?
You got some brass.
''......never in y 48 tears in this chamber,
have I seen a nominee treated so disrespectfully as I have today......''
.................Senator Patrick Leahy

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@no1marauder said
I suppose any answer but "A device for carrying babies" wouldn't have satisfied right wingers.
I'd have settled for "an adult human female", but as least she seems to acknowledge it should have something to do with biology.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@jimm619 said
Us people?
You got some brass.
''......never in y 48 tears in this chamber,
have I seen a nominee treated so disrespectfully as I have today......''
.................Senator Patrick Leahy
Oh, im sure that under the present atmoshere of the transformation of America, spearheaded and still controlled by Obama, promulgated by y’all, that you will forgive me wearing my emotions on my sleeve.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

BOO!

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@sleepyguy said
I'd have settled for "an adult human female", but as least she seems to acknowledge it should have something to do with biology.
There's clearly a dispute about this in our society, illustrated clearly in new bathroom laws and transgender athletes in sports that might make it to SCOTUS.

Instead of defining it prior to hearing oral arguments, she deferred to biology. I don't understand what conservatives don't like about her answer.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Haha and today I see Cruz asking her if he could self identify as Asian.
😀 😉 😀

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@wildgrass said
There's clearly a dispute about this in our society, illustrated clearly in new bathroom laws and transgender athletes in sports that might make it to SCOTUS.

Instead of defining it prior to hearing oral arguments, she deferred to biology. I don't understand what conservatives don't like about her answer.
One thing is that the other 8 justices will have to spar with her throughout her tenure as she laces her comments with opinions that are, shall we say, concepts with which they are not familiar. Outside the realm of her duties as a judge.....guardian and interpreter of the constitution . That is it. But it won't be IT for her. Do you agree? Do you think she will stay between the rails? I don't.
They will take a lunch break during discussions, go to the cafeteria, and say...'what in the hell!!!??"

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
One thing is that the other 8 justices will have to spar with her throughout her tenure as she laces her comments with opinions that are, shall we say, concepts with which they are not familiar. Outside the realm of her duties as a judge.....guardian and interpreter of the constitution . That is it. But it won't be IT for her. Do you agree? Do you think she will stay ...[text shortened]... y will take a lunch break during discussions, go to the cafeteria, and say...'what in the hell!!!??"
To be fair Joe, the word 'woman' is nowhere to be found in the Constitution, so it's outside the realm of her duties as a judge to define it.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@averagejoe1 said
One thing is that the other 8 justices will have to spar with her throughout her tenure as she laces her comments with opinions that are, shall we say, concepts with which they are not familiar. Outside the realm of her duties as a judge.....guardian and interpreter of the constitution . That is it. But it won't be IT for her. Do you agree? Do you think she will stay ...[text shortened]... y will take a lunch break during discussions, go to the cafeteria, and say...'what in the hell!!!??"
She may find like minded souls in Kagan and the wide Latina.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@wildgrass said
To be fair Joe, the word 'woman' is nowhere to be found in the Constitution, so it's outside the realm of her duties as a judge to define it.
Not a bad point, there should be no mention of race, sex, disability, marriage status on any goobermint literature, before the state and before the law all should be equal.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@jimm619 said
Us people?
You got some brass.
''......never in y 48 tears in this chamber,
have I seen a nominee treated so disrespectfully as I have today......''
.................Senator Patrick Leahy
Really...?

Democrats,, remember what you did to Kavanaugh in front of his family? Payback's a bytch, eh?

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@wajoma said
Not a bad point, there should be no mention of race, sex, disability, marriage status on any goobermint literature, before the state and before the law all should be equal.
Right well just because it's not mentioned doesn't mean it's not to be legislated. That'd be silly.

It was irrelevant for a SCOTUS nomination hearing though.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.