Okay. I read up about it and her.
Seemingly she’s been under investigation or interviewed about it since 2016.
It’s not sure yet if the charges are actually going to be brought, they’re still investigating her role in it.
She says that she didn’t know people were being killed.
And that there, that’s probably what this is about.
She’s probably managed to stay unnoticed in society and then was found.
During interviews she’s then stated: “I knew nothin’”.
In a small camp, with mass starvation, execution and even gas chambers... she knew nothin’.
Either that is true (it’s hardly likely it’s true) or she has to face the facts and the shame.
She won’t go to prison or be fined or anything. She’s an example of attrocities and that one can never hide from justice.
Obviously you can ask the question: isn’t it time to let the past go?
But looking at society and what’s happening, it’s probably best to hound the bastards as much as possible.
@shavixmirsaid Okay. I read up about it and her.
Seemingly she’s been under investigation or interviewed about it since 2016.
It’s not sure yet if the charges are actually going to be brought, they’re still investigating her role in it.
She says that she didn’t know people were being killed.
And that there, that’s probably what this is about.
She’s probably managed to stay ...[text shortened]... oking at society and what’s happening, it’s probably best to hound the bastards as much as possible.
Let's say for the sake of argument she did know people were being killed in the camp.
Does that make a secretary "complicit" in the murders? How about a janitor?
And what really is the point of prosecution at this time anyway?