The post that was quoted here has been removedI can't have both failed to grasp a distinction and got the distinction backwards. Which is it?
And yes, I consider gratuitous / inconsequential / noble lies all ignorable. It'd be kind of cool if Kamala Harris was a GM but I don't really care either way and it affects no one.
The consequential lies are not necessarily condemnable, but they are the ones we should be paying attention to.
The post that was quoted here has been removedHa. the "correct" distinction is that dumb lies are more important than smart ones?
Logically, a distinction exists irrespective of direction, and your point about the correct distinction is absolute garbage.
You want to focus on abstract inconsequential lies rather than important ones. This is the distinction you refer to. How did I get it backwards?
@dood111 saidYet another clear cut case of election fraud .
Says as a child it was a big deal for her whole family across several generations.
What an obvious self-serving lie, it wasn't invented until two years after her birth and it didn't begin to catch on for twenty years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Eiku1rjHw
It's as believable as Biden's fairy tale about standing up to Corn Pop and his gang while wearing a Speedo..
Take it to the Supreme Court immediately !