@no1marauder saidClaude AI says you are an idiot for trying to present that information.
"Black-on-White murders as a percentage of White population = 566/258646488 = 0.22 per 100,000 White people murdered by Black people
White-on-Black murders as a percentage of Black population = 246/48221139 = 0.51 per 100,000 Black people murdered by White people
***************************************
Q : What is the statistical flaw in presenting these kinds of statistics "
A: The Core Statistical Flaw: Wrong Denominator
The fundamental problem is **using the victim population as the denominator** when making an implied claim about perpetrator behavior. This conflates two different questions.
What the denominator actually does-
- Dividing by the **White population** (258M) produces a small number because White Americans are a large group
- Dividing by the **Black population** (48M) produces a larger number because it's a much smaller group
**************************************.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidAJ: Your next paragraph says that the residence of the tent should have run to get a policeman. Probably the weakest thing you have said in this discussion.
Any jury would know that in that society of competitive ball players with teams, and all that goes with it, had their private places. You are wrong as usual with your head in the clouds. It would be a given on that campus that that place, whatever it was was a place reserved for certain people, in this little fella was not one of those people. The jury would know that, yo ...[text shortened]... ink you should be able to walk into a private country club.???????You will not answer that question.
Actually I said a security guard, coach or someone in authority. Why exactly is that "weak"? If Metcalf had, the whole incident would have been avoided, he'd be alive and Anthony wouldn't be going to prison. Maybe that person would have told Anthony he had to leave, maybe he would have told Metcalf to chill out "he's just getting out of the rain" but there would have been no physical confrontation.
I go to beautiful Great American Ballpark, saunter up to my beloved seat in the outfield and find someone sitting there. I say "Excuse me sir/madam, you are sitting in my seat" showing them my ticket. They ignore me or just say "I'm not moving".
Should I:
A) Engage in a four minute argument with them, eventually grabbing and shoving them? OR
B) Go get a security guard?
Remember your "I answer every question" rule.
@Rajk999 saidThere is no "flaw".
Claude AI says you are an idiot for trying to present that information.
***************************************
Q : What is the statistical flaw in presenting these kinds of statistics "
A: The Core Statistical Flaw: Wrong Denominator
The fundamental problem is **using the victim population as the denominator** when making an implied claim about perpetrator behavio ...[text shortened]... roduces a larger number because it's a much smaller group
**************************************.
I'm standing next to my Black friend Lee. He is twice as likely to be the victim of a homicide committed on him by a White person as I am to be the victim of a homicide committed on me by a Black person.
Chew on that.
@no1marauder saidThat’s incorrect, whites are 20% more likely to be attacked by a black person.
There is no "flaw".
I'm standing next to my Black friend Lee. He is twice as likely to be the victim of a homicide committed on him by a White person as I am to be the victim of a homicide committed on me by a Black person.
Chew on that.
@no1marauder saidWhat’s the percent for black on black?
There is no "flaw".
I'm standing next to my Black friend Lee. He is twice as likely to be the victim of a homicide committed on him by a White person as I am to be the victim of a homicide committed on me by a Black person.
Chew on that.
@mike69 saidI think it is worse than that. Using Marauders figures, and just switching the denominator, we can get ..
That’s incorrect, whites are 20% more likely to be attacked by a black person.
Murders by One Group / Pop of that Group X 1,000,000 = The # of murders of that group committed against the other group per Million
So:
Blacks :
566 / 48,221,139 X 1,000,000 = 11.73
For every million Blacks, they kill about 12 Whites.
Whites :
246 / 258,646,488 X 1,000,000 = 0.95
For every million Whites, they kill about 1 Black person,
The ratio is 12:1
I think the year in Maruaders post was 2018. The man is conartists to wilfully twist such simple data.
@Rajk999 saidYes, I’ve actually seen it many times in outrage videos, put out by black people. It’s easy to see, the victim card is holding them down, sad as a whole.
Not sure if anyone mentioned this, but there are many black homes, not only in the US, where racism and hatred, is part of the family culture. Black youths are often brought up to believe that is not a serious offence to kill a white person, or rape a white woman. It is considered to be part of the reparations owed to them.
In the case of killer of Iryna Zarutska, DeCarl ...[text shortened]... tabbed her, with a smile on his face.
This is why in the minds of blacks the jury was not fair.
1 edit
@Rajk999 saidHe is very dishonest, being smart enough to know how Correct figures come about.
I think it is worse than that. Using Marauders figures, and just switching the denominator, we can get ..
Murders by One Group / Pop of that Group X 1,000,000 = The # of murders of that group committed against the other group per Million
So:
Blacks :
566 / 48,221,139 X 1,000,000 = 11.73
For every million Blacks, they kill about 12 Whites.
Whites :
246 ...[text shortened]... think the year in Maruaders post was 2018. The man is conartists to wilfully twist such simple data.
1 edit
@Booga saidI don’t care about race, although it’s clear those defending a cold blooded murder do. Racist calling people racist and they don’t even realize it, it’s sad. This clown is just too proud to admit his stance is ridiculous.
@no1marauder
Look at this black loving race traitor living in denial! 🤣
He actually posts his delusions online?
@no1marauder saidyou simply shove a knife in their chest...problem solved
AJ: Your next paragraph says that the residence of the tent should have run to get a policeman. Probably the weakest thing you have said in this discussion.
Actually I said a security guard, coach or someone in authority. Why exactly is that "weak"? If Metcalf had, the whole incident would have been avoided, he'd be alive and Anthony wouldn't be going to prison. Maybe ...[text shortened]... and shoving them? OR
B) Go get a security guard?
Remember your "I answer every question" rule.