@no1marauder saidAny jury would know that in that society of competitive ball players with teams, and all that goes with it, had their private places. You are wrong as usual with your head in the clouds. It would be a given on that campus that that place, whatever it was was a place reserved for certain people, in this little fella was not one of those people. The jury would know that, you pretend don’t know that.
Nope there hasn't been any showing that Anthony A) Knew he wasn't allowed to sit there ("Witnesses agreed that Anthony seemed friendly and relaxed when he first sat down."😉 OR B) He actually wasn't allowed to sit there. So you're just making s**t up like you usually do.
And you haven't addressed, because you can't, the simple fact that Metcalf had no authority to orde ...[text shortened]... canopy set up in a public stadium was "just like" Metcalf's living room. Even for you, that's dumb.
Your next paragraph says that the residence of the tent should have run to get a policeman. Probably the weakest thing you have said in this discussion.
Yes, I am sorry that you and Susie have trouble with analogies, but it was indeed, for purposes of this discussion, the same in that tent as it would have been in your private living room.
You have failed on each issue here.
Like I keep saying, give it up
MarauderCrockett will not confirm that the privacy of his living room equates to the privacy of a cohesive team, maybe discussing strategy, under a tent.
Of course, we have to take him into consideration that marauder as a liberal does not believe in private anything. Everything is wide open with liberals. They should be able to walk into a private country club. Tell me Marauder, , do you think you should be able to walk into a private country club.???????You will not answer that question.
@AverageJoe1 saidThe issue of who was allowed in the tent was irrelevant to the charges. But no one has yet shown the tent (more like a canopy) was limited to team members and you and the others haven't even tried. So you can keeping saying it was like Metcalf's living room until you are blue in the face but that remains utter and complete BS. What we can say with complete and utter certainty is Metcalf had no legal authority over Anthony and certainly no right to put his hands on the defendant even the prosecutor conceded that. "You don't answer a shove with a knife" as he put it goes to the reasonableness of the response under self-defense law, it is not a justification to the initial physical intrusion.
Any jury would know that in that society of competitive ball players with teams, and all that goes with it, had their private places. You are wrong as usual with your head in the clouds. It would be a given on that campus that that place, whatever it was was a place reserved for certain people, in this little fella was not one of those people. The jury would know that, yo ...[text shortened]... ink you should be able to walk into a private country club.???????You will not answer that question.
I can tell you still haven't even looked at the picture of the "tent". Further discussion is a waste of time because you are so uninterested in the facts.
The last paragraph is typical demented raving by you.
@no1marauder saidHave you thought about it’s you who needs to verify your sources. I’m done with your stupidity, I’ve wasted enough time on you.
His own brother told police he was trying to push Anthony out of the tent. From two pages ago:
""His twin brother, Hunter Metcalf, was also at the meet and spoke to officers at the scene. He said that after his brother told Anthony he had to leave the tent because he didn't go to Memorial, the two "went back and forth and [b]then Austin stood up and pushed the male to ...[text shortened]... ?utm_source=chatgpt.com
And you obviously missed that nowhere did I criticize the jury's verdict.
@no1marauder saidEveryone wants you to cut to the chase. Tell us what the resulting verdict should have been given that Metcalf acted improperly, and that Anthony was not that bad a guy who had a promising future. I think that’s what you said….promise. And that he was black. So what should’ve been the resulting verdict of the jury.
The issue of who was allowed in the tent was irrelevant to the charges. But no one has yet shown the tent (more like a canopy) was limited to team members and you and the others haven't even tried. So you can keeping saying it was like Metcalf's living room until you are blue in the face but that remains utter and complete BS. What we can say with complete and utter cert ...[text shortened]... cause you are so uninterested in the facts.
The last paragraph is typical demented raving by you.
What should be a sentence for this person who jammed a knife into another person’s heart?
@AverageJoe1
Please do not forget to tell us if you feel like you have a right to walk in to a private country club.
@no1marauder saidYou are accusing the jury of racism …dayuum
I have and nowhere have I criticized the jury's verdict. As pretty much everyone here who pays attention knows, I don't do that unless the judge gives incorrect legal instructions and/or rulings which "taint" the verdict.
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidTo Marauder Crockett: Then you are not talking about the case at hand, you are using the forum as a bantering place to be a contrarian.,… And you are losing.
You are accusing the jury of racism …dayuum
@AverageJoe1 saidNone of those factors should be relevant in the guilt phase.
Everyone wants you to cut to the chase. Tell us what the resulting verdict should have been given that Metcalf acted improperly, and that Anthony was not that bad a guy who had a promising future. I think that’s what you said….promise. And that he was black. So what should’ve been the resulting verdict of the jury.
What should be a sentence for this person who jammed a knife into another person’s heart?
@no1marauder saidAll the blacks running around claiming it was an unfair trial, are mentally incompetent, and if you need a scientific study to tell you that, you are in the same boat with them.
Gee maybe you could provide a scientific study showing what percentage of "black homes" have this as part of their "family culture".
DeCarlos Brown was just found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-accused-killing-ukrainian-refugee-north-carolina-train-found-incom-rcna349258
That suggests a mental disability or illness not some ill-defined "culture" issue.
These murderers need to be put down.
@no1marauder saidYoure welcome. A coldblooded murder was committed by a black man. Quite likely the parents, and others around knew he was carrying a knife to a college sports event. The man said 'touch me and you will find out'. That is proof of premeditation. Next comes the support from the parents the wider black community. The community support is the reason why this will never end and can only end with violence. There is no talking and no pleading that will stop this racist black community.
Thanks for your completely rational input.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidAnthony already filed a Notice of Appeal. I already discussed the Batson challenge. There might be other grounds as well.
Damn shytweasel…why are you wanting an appeal? Based on what?
Appeals are standard parts of the judicial system, do you have a problem with them?