Kid Kills Dad

http://news.msn.com/us/4-year-old-boy-accidentally-kills-dad-in-arizona

Wow that kid is going to need therapy for a long time.

His Mom is going to have a tough time dating anyone new.

"This is my son. I'm single because he shot and killed his father. Want to be his stepfather?"

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
http://news.msn.com/us/4-year-old-boy-accidentally-kills-dad-in-arizona

If the father had been armed he could have protected himself.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
If the father had been armed he could have protected himself.

Banning high capacity magazines is the answer.

We need more guns.

Originally posted by moon1969
We need more guns.

We need mo welfea!!!

With a hammer he would've been just as dangerous.

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
With a hammer he would've been just as dangerous.

Or a 5-gallon bucket

Originally posted by wolfgang59
If the father had been armed he could have protected himself.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, it's people who kill, not guns.

Originally posted by Rank outsider
I've said it before and I'll say it again, it's people who kill, not guns.

Yep. People; like 4 year-old kids.
Without a gun it would probably have been a knife
(accidently thrown into the air and severing his father's jugular.)

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Banning high capacity magazines is the answer.

Nice.

Government is the leading cause for unnatural death worldwide. Limit government not guns if you are concerned for public safety. Gun control is smoke and mirrors for governmet wanting to limit the ability of the average citezen to stop tyranny and defend against it.

Originally posted by joe beyser
Government is the leading cause for unnatural death worldwide. Limit government not guns if you are concerned for public safety. Gun control is smoke and mirrors for governmet wanting to limit the ability of the average citezen to stop tyranny and defend against it.

Government serves a useful purpose. The insane massive proliferation of guns in our society does not.

Originally posted by moon1969
Government serves a useful purpose. The insane massive proliferation of guns in our society does not.

You must be wrong with your second point. If guns served no useful purpose, then people would not massively produce them.