Go back
Letitia James defrauds bank. Why is Trump named in this headline??

Letitia James defrauds bank. Why is Trump named in this headline??

Debates


Just look at the headline, it ends by saying pressure by Trump. That would be quite irrelevant to average Joe, as we are looking at her, and her crime, and trying her. That is three things, none of which mention Trump. maybe I should’ve written the headline.
If I rob a bank, the headline would say “average Joe indicted for robbing bank” , but it would not say “average Joe indicted for robbing a bank because the mayor pressured it””
God you liberals. Here it is.

https://apnews.com/article/letitia-james-fraud-justice-department-donald-trump-41d8746d4674f2be42d667647089b213


@AverageJoe1 said
Just look at the headline, it ends by saying pressure by Trump. That would be quite irrelevant to average Joe, as we are looking at her, and her crime, and trying her. That is three things, none of which mention Trump. maybe I should’ve written the headline.
If I rob a bank, the headline would say “average Joe indicted for robbing bank” , but it would not say “averag ...[text shortened]... ews.com/article/letitia-james-fraud-justice-department-donald-trump-41d8746d4674f2be42d667647089b213
Keep on re-puking the puke Trump Pukes. It gets stinkier every time you post this POS ALREADY BEEN REFUTED attack.


@sonhouse said
Keep on re-puking the puke Trump Pukes. It gets stinkier every time you post this POS ALREADY BEEN REFUTED attack.
We are looking for you on that other thread.


@AverageJoe1 said
We are looking for you on that other thread.
I looked other posts of Sonhouse, what are we to answer his posts, the way he writes? It is really disjointed.


@AverageJoe1 said
Just look at the headline, it ends by saying pressure by Trump. That would be quite irrelevant to average Joe, as we are looking at her, and her crime, and trying her. That is three things, none of which mention Trump. maybe I should’ve written the headline.
If I rob a bank, the headline would say “average Joe indicted for robbing bank” , but it would not say “averag ...[text shortened]... ews.com/article/letitia-james-fraud-justice-department-donald-trump-41d8746d4674f2be42d667647089b213
Isn't it just because trump asked his DOJ to prosecute her specifically?


@AverageJoe1 said
We are looking for you on that other thread.
So show us your evidence she committed some crime.
BTW, 4 members of Trump's own cabinet has the same MO on their home purchases. It was in the original documents her second home was listed as a possible rental but I guess that was too subtle for you or the prosecutor who never prosecuted a case and ALSO BTW, ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY prosecutors were asked and refused to indict James. So this beauty queen with ZERO prosecutorial experience filed the motion herself.
I guess in your world that means there are now 150 MORE enemies of Trump.


Trump’s family has made $3.4 billion during his time as president, new report finds.
Criminal of the century


@wildgrass said
Isn't it just because trump asked his DOJ to prosecute her specifically?
You miss the issue of the day. The woman has acted, of her own accord, follow me here, to LIE on an application. Read it for yourself, jesus, This brings prosecution...by her actions. LIke you shoot a guy in the subway, you go to jail.
The person that SENDS you to jail is not relevant. How shallow can you get.

I cannot BElIEVE you TDS people cannot move on. It. has nothimg to do with him, he might have said to apply the law? Well, should not a president apply the law?


@AverageJoe1 said
Just look at the headline, it ends by saying pressure by Trump. That would be quite irrelevant to average Joe, as we are looking at her, and her crime, and trying her. That is three things, none of which mention Trump. maybe I should’ve written the headline.
If I rob a bank, the headline would say “average Joe indicted for robbing bank” , but it would not say “averag ...[text shortened]... ews.com/article/letitia-james-fraud-justice-department-donald-trump-41d8746d4674f2be42d667647089b213
I think it is interesting that James ran on the promise she would get Trump and Trump is trying to get her for essentially the same charge. She denies the charges so if she did nothing she will be just fine.

The problem is we know very little about what she is alleged to have done specifically. Why isn't anyone telling us? Is it a secret?


@sonhouse said
So show us your evidence she committed some crime.
BTW, 4 members of Trump's own cabinet has the same MO on their home purchases. It was in the original documents her second home was listed as a possible rental but I guess that was too subtle for you or the prosecutor who never prosecuted a case and ALSO BTW, ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY prosecutors were asked and refused to indi ...[text shortened]... filed the motion herself.
I guess in your world that means there are now 150 MORE enemies of Trump.
This one, Sonhouse, writes one sentence to 'look up' her infraction, her crime, the lying on an application, as to her legal residence. This sonhouse has abandoned the thread about Trump saying to drink some horrible substance, which he most certainly did not ......................let that sink in...........................and has jumped over here to distract us,,,,,,and asks US to LOOK UP her infraction!!! Hell , just turn on the news!!!! You think us fools, sonhouse!!!!!

And THEN, he starts writing about Trump's cabinet. Hey sonhouse, let us go ahead and wrap up this horrible Laetitia James, get her in jail, and then yes, by all means, let us get any cabinet lawbreakers!!!!!
Go for it .
Go for it sonhouse. James' proof is all over the internet, send us the info on the cabinet home purchases.
But first tell us the evidence of Trump telling us to drink bleach.
Are you the forum def of conflicted?


@happy-chappy said
Trump’s family has made $3.4 billion during his time as president, new report finds.
Criminal of the century
I have earned money in my day. Am I automatically a criminal? I do not get your post.

Who is this happy chappy person. His post is lacking.... must be new.

But you are welcome chappy, need new blood. Bring it.


@wildgrass said
Isn't it just because trump asked his DOJ to prosecute her specifically?
Maybe he did, but James ran on the promise she would prosecute Trump specifically. Who is the lesser of the 2 evils and why? Hard to tell.


@Metal-Brain said
I think it is interesting that James ran on the promise she would get Trump and Trump is trying to get her for essentially the same charge. She denies the charges so if she did nothing she will be just fine.

The problem is we know very little about what she is alleged to have done specifically. Why isn't anyone telling us? Is it a secret?
We must wait on the evidence, I have seen quite a bit, google it.

Point of order......YES< she ran on getting Trump, we will get him and find something he has done!

The difference MB, ....................follow me here, you friendlh little misguided liberal, ......Trump did not run on a promise to get this horrible jackal. Ask Sonhouse, he'll tell you.
You see rhe difference? Trump is too slick for all of you . He is too slick. Suzianne is the only one here who could take him on, toe to toe!


@AverageJoe1 said
Just look at the headline, it ends by saying pressure by Trump. That would be quite irrelevant to average Joe, as we are looking at her, and her crime, and trying her. That is three things, none of which mention Trump. maybe I should’ve written the headline.
If I rob a bank, the headline would say “average Joe indicted for robbing bank” , but it would not say “averag ...[text shortened]... ews.com/article/letitia-james-fraud-justice-department-donald-trump-41d8746d4674f2be42d667647089b213
Dear Joe - If you knew how ignorant you sounded; you'd stop posting here altogether. I used to own several rental properties and bought 2 of them exactly the same way Leticia James did. My lawyer said all the bank was concerned about was getting their payments on time every month.

I heard this same garbage about 1031 tax deferred exchanges and wrap around mortgages, both of which are still being done today.

Pull your head out of your right wing media hole and do some research for a change. 🙄


@mchill said
Dear Joe - If you knew how ignorant you sounded; you'd stop posting here altogether. I used to own several rental properties and bought 2 of them exactly the same way Leticia James did. My lawyer said all the bank was concerned about was getting their payments on time every month.

I heard this same garbage about 1031 tax deferred exchanges and wrap around mortgages, both o ...[text shortened]... ne today.

Pull your head out of your right wing media hole and do some research for a change. 🙄
OK. If I follow, your lawyer told you...your lawyer told you,,,,to buy your rental properties and say that they are your personal residence? (Real estate law is like kindergarten to me, for the record). (So is fraud)]
So she said that they were her residence(s). I assume you did not? If you did, you best not publish that here!!!

Your lawyer should be disbarred.