@no1marauder saidJames case against Trump was weak.
The case against James is absurdly weak and the professional prosecutors in that district refused to file it, so Trump had the head one replaced and brought in one of his lawyers with absolutely zero prosecutorial experience who was willing to pursue it on partisan grounds. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-justice-department-s-dangerously-weak-case-against-letitia-james
Remind me again which court threw out the judgment against Trump.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidYou ignore the venom of this woman, man. Be genuous. (That is not a word, but it fits). MANY business people i NYC play the same game.
Trump's shady business practices have been well known for decades in New York.
But Marauder, she had it out,, personally,, for donald trump. Some could surmise she was a cog in the machine to do any and everything to keep him from becoming (a great) president.
You know it, i know it, we all know it . It was personal, it was political. She hated his guts.
You, my man, are disingenuous. She went way out of bounds. Devoted years of her life to it, sat on the front row with fire in her eyes. Sat there. Fire.
GIVE ME A BREAK. Geez
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNo court did. The Appellate Division reiterated that he committed fraud, but vacated the money award. The case will be decided by NY's highest court.
James case against Trump was weak.
Remind me again which court threw out the judgment against Trump.
@AverageJoe1 saidStop. Trump posts more venom daily towards others on social media than James did towards him in her entire life.
You ignore the venom of this woman, man. Be genuous. (That is not a word, but it fits). MANY business people i NYC play the same game.
But Marauder, she had it out,, personally,, for donald trump. Some could surmise she was a cog in the machine to do any and everything to keep him from becoming (a great) president.
You know it, i know it, we all know it . It was ...[text shortened]... r life to it, sat on the front row with fire in her eyes. Sat there. Fire.
GIVE ME A BREAK. Geez
@no1marauder saidDo you not know what an “appeals court”
No court did. The Appellate Division reiterated that he committed fraud, but vacated the money award. The case will be decided by NY's highest court.
is? 😂
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/21/new-york-civil-fraud-judgment-trump-ruling-00517727
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI'm well aware of the ruling and it did exactly what I said.https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5464605-trump-civil-fraud-takeaways/
Do you not know what an “appeals court”
is? 😂
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/21/new-york-civil-fraud-judgment-trump-ruling-00517727
@no1marauder saidruling by a COURT? LMFAO
I'm well aware of the ruling and it did exactly what I said.
@no1marauder saidweak, even from you
Stop. Trump posts more venom daily towards others on social media than James did towards him in her entire life.
@no1marauder saidto quote you,,,
Who else do you think makes rulings on legal cases?
"No court did."
LMFAO
@no1marauder saidnonono....I have made one point , it is about James, who signed her name personally to fraudulent information. Defrauding a lender. She has made her own bed.
Stop. Trump posts more venom daily towards others on social media than James did towards him in her entire life.
She targeted Trump. You want it all to go away, little feller.
Is that why you answer my post by writing about Trump? This is not about Trump, she is guilty of a crime, which is proven even before trial, we will wait for sentencing, and you can take her milk and cookies....for being a criminal. We know all of this, and all of your extraneous writings, but the question before us.......WHY does the news add the little blurb that trump promotes justice for this person?
She targeted him for justice, so why does it bother you that a president sees fraud by an officer of the court, and wants to be sure it is dealt with?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIdiot, no court threw out the judgment like you claimed.
to quote you,,,
"No court did."
LMFAO
@AverageJoe1 saidHypocrite.
nonono....I have made one point , it is about James, who signed her name personally to fraudulent information. Defrauding a lender. She has made her own bed.
She targeted Trump. You want it all to go away, little feller.
Is that why you answer my post by writing about Trump? This is not about Trump, she is guilty of a crime, which is proven even before trial, ...[text shortened]... r you that a president sees fraud by an officer of the court, and wants to be sure it is dealt with?
Everything is always about Trump.
You've said it yourself.
Grow up.