@AverageJoe1 saidI guess that would be because you think the emolument clause is just a suggestion. No biggie Trump clocked in 3 billion as a sitting president.
I have earned money in my day. Am I automatically a criminal? I do not get your post.
Who is this happy chappy person. His post is lacking.... must be new.
But you are welcome chappy, need new blood. Bring it.
But OF COURSE for you, never even a THOUGHT there could be corruption involved to have gotten that money.
You are extremely gullible, once you get sucked into a cult you are in it for life and there is nothing you can do to change that now, you are beyond help now.
@AverageJoe1 saidMaybe to make some reference to the irony that Trump chronically inflated the values of his properties when applying for new loans?
Just look at the headline, it ends by saying pressure by Trump. That would be quite irrelevant to average Joe, as we are looking at her, and her crime, and trying her. That is three things, none of which mention Trump. maybe I should’ve written the headline.
If I rob a bank, the headline would say “average Joe indicted for robbing bank” , but it would not say “averag ...[text shortened]... ews.com/article/letitia-james-fraud-justice-department-donald-trump-41d8746d4674f2be42d667647089b213
@AverageJoe1 saidI am no liberal. Not the kind of liberal that you think anyway.
We must wait on the evidence, I have seen quite a bit, google it.
Point of order......YES< she ran on getting Trump, we will get him and find something he has done!
The difference MB, ....................follow me here, you friendlh little misguided liberal, ......Trump did not run on a promise to get this horrible jackal. Ask Sonhouse, he'll tell you.
You se ...[text shortened]... for all of you . He is too slick. Suzianne is the only one here who could take him on, toe to toe!
Are you a conservative? What are you trying to conserve? Republicans are liberal military spenders. Debt is still increasing which is why we have a shutdown. Both parties do that despite the rhetoric. Both parties are liberal.
@AverageJoe1 saidThe DOJ has never been weaponized before.
Just look at the headline, it ends by saying pressure by Trump. That would be quite irrelevant to average Joe, as we are looking at her, and her crime, and trying her. That is three things, none of which mention Trump. maybe I should’ve written the headline.
If I rob a bank, the headline would say “average Joe indicted for robbing bank” , but it would not say “averag ...[text shortened]... ews.com/article/letitia-james-fraud-justice-department-donald-trump-41d8746d4674f2be42d667647089b213
THAT's why.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 said"This brings prosecution...by her actions. LIke you shoot a guy in the subway, you go to jail."
You miss the issue of the day. The woman has acted, of her own accord, follow me here, to LIE on an application. Read it for yourself, jesus, This brings prosecution...by her actions. LIke you shoot a guy in the subway, you go to jail.
The person that SENDS you to jail is not relevant. How shallow can you get.
I cannot BElIEVE you TDS people cannot move on. ...[text shortened]... mg to do with him, he might have said to apply the law? Well, should not a president apply the law?
YOU people with TDS cannot 'move on' because this perfectly describes why Trump now has 34 felonies on his rap sheet. And YOU all want to "get her back". What freaking babies.
@AverageJoe1 saidSure, but Trump's in the headline because he asked for her specifically to be prosecuted.
You miss the issue of the day. The woman has acted, of her own accord, follow me here, to LIE on an application. Read it for yourself, jesus, This brings prosecution...by her actions. LIke you shoot a guy in the subway, you go to jail.
The person that SENDS you to jail is not relevant. How shallow can you get.
I cannot BElIEVE you TDS people cannot move on. ...[text shortened]... mg to do with him, he might have said to apply the law? Well, should not a president apply the law?
@AverageJoe1 saidThe application actually says the second house was a vacation home NOT primary residence.
You miss the issue of the day. The woman has acted, of her own accord, follow me here, to LIE on an application. Read it for yourself, jesus, This brings prosecution...by her actions. LIke you shoot a guy in the subway, you go to jail.
The person that SENDS you to jail is not relevant. How shallow can you get.
I cannot BElIEVE you TDS people cannot move on. ...[text shortened]... mg to do with him, he might have said to apply the law? Well, should not a president apply the law?
You want to follow every rabbit hole Trump sticks you in but you are 100% LYING. That is RIGHT ON THE ORIGINAL PAPERS.
So continue to be a tame magat, your Lord Trump will give you a GREAT cushy job when he is finally anointed KING Trump.
@wildgrass saidMaybe he did, but she broke the law and needs to be indicted. His sideline activity is irrelevant. You seem to suggest that she probably should have been given a pass if he had not said something?. Are you saying that?
Sure, but Trump's in the headline because he asked for her specifically to be prosecuted.
What is your point?
Yes or no, should she be indicted. The Lib state of conflict and confusion is pervasive throughout the Forum
@AverageJoe1 saidYes crime should be punished. Yes, trump should be in all news headlines on the subject because he directed the indictment. We went through years of you arguing that trump deserved to be given a pass.
Maybe he did, but she broke the law and needs to be indicted. His sideline activity is irrelevant. You seem to suggest that she probably should have been given a pass if he had not said something?. Are you saying that?
What is your point?
Yes or no, should she be indicted. The Lib state of conflict and confusion is pervasive throughout the Forum
@wildgrass saidwouldnt you?
Sure, but Trump's in the headline because he asked for her specifically to be prosecuted.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNo I don't think I would. I'm not a lawyer, I would let the lawyers decide who to indict and when. Otherwise it would appear as vindictive or biased prosecution.
wouldnt you?
@Arkturos saidLook it up. His marolago is worth much muc muc much more than whatever he submitted. Nice try, but a disingenuous try. You guys are just flailing like a drowning man.
Maybe to make some reference to the irony that Trump chronically inflated the values of his properties when applying for new loans?
Look it up.
@sonhouse saidWell, I don’t think he would get our stuff if he were king. AOC , who will be ‘28 nominee, will get your stuff. Maybe you don’t HAVE any stuff , so you are all for AOC. Trump won’t give you a dam thing.
The application actually says the second house was a vacation home NOT primary residence.
You want to follow every rabbit hole Trump sticks you in but you are 100% LYING. That is RIGHT ON THE ORIGINAL PAPERS.
So continue to be a tame magat, your Lord Trump will give you a GREAT cushy job when he is finally anointed KING Trump.