Go back
Letitia James defrauds bank. Why is Trump named in this headline??

Letitia James defrauds bank. Why is Trump named in this headline??

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Mott-The-Hoople said
weak, even from you
More factual than you, for sure.

That's "weak"? Your boy is the weak one.

He is STILL throwing tantrums about the NPP.

What a baby.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
You ignore the venom of this woman, man. Be genuous. (That is not a word, but it fits). MANY business people i NYC play the same game.
But Marauder, she had it out,, personally,, for donald trump. Some could surmise she was a cog in the machine to do any and everything to keep him from becoming (a great) president.
You know it, i know it, we all know it . It was ...[text shortened]... r life to it, sat on the front row with fire in her eyes. Sat there. Fire.
GIVE ME A BREAK. Geez
You ignore the venom of Trump.

He doesn't negotiate, he bullies until people give in, not the same. At all.

"to do any and everything to keep him from becoming (a great) president"

He does that himself.


@AverageJoe1 said
Look it up. His marolago is worth much muc muc much more than whatever he submitted. Nice try, but a disingenuous try. You guys are just flailing like a drowning man.
Look it up.
"You guys?" Which homogeneous group do you believe I belong to, I wonder.


Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Sad because you're not getting my attention?

Stand in line, goober.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
Correct, she only sued him and then sat back. "My work is done here.'
Her 'work' was to follow through on a campaign promise, to wit..

AI Overview
Letitia James repeatedly vowed to investigate and sue Donald Trump during her 2018 campaign for New York Attorney General, but she did not specifically promise a criminal prosecution. Critics characterized her promises ...[text shortened]... im? You fellows line up with strange bedfellows. Marauder and Laetitia.,sittin' in a tree.👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩
Letting AI do your thinking for you.

How sad.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@YEAH-BOY said
Like I said broken adnauseam. Your analogies.suck as usual. Your grandma told me she is sick of you also.
And I daresay, everyone on this thread works harder than he does.

I know I do.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
I have earned money in my day. Am I automatically a criminal? I do not get your post.

Who is this happy chappy person. His post is lacking.... must be new.

But you are welcome chappy, need new blood. Bring it.
Presidents are not supposed to make money off the presidency.

Look it up.

The Four Horsemen of Rushmore would be appalled.

1 edit

@Suzianne said
Sad because you're not getting my attention?

Stand in line, goober.
Oh, I've had plenty of your attention -- so many notifications about your replies to my posts, about 90% of which I usually delete without clicking through. 😉

Just so you know: barring medical advances, at best I probably only have another 20 or 30 good years left in me, and might not always be available (or willing) to provide such instructive and challenging assignments.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Arkturos said
Oh, I've had plenty of your attention -- so many notifications about your replies to my posts, about 90% of which I usually delete. 😉
Ditto, my simpleton non-friend.

1 edit

@Suzianne said
Ditto, my simpleton non-friend.
So, is this some kind of Anglophile thing you are attempting, where the worse you treat me the more it means you like me?

Speaking as a fellow American from the Upper Midwest (originally), I find it rather disappointing that you have succumbed to such a duplicitous, cowardly, diffident, and fundamentally bet-hedging approach to these forums -- apparently just to fit in.

Hmm. Now my suspicions have evolved.

At first I thought the mods might have handed both you and Ghost a timeout just to take both of you out of the equation and to see how I behaved in the forums without either or both of you hounding me.

But your sudden return and Ghost's continuing silence might indicate that the unspeakably superior and haughty stage-manager is trying to manipulate the two of us into getting along -- which would really still be none of his damn business!

I'm not against you, but my perception is that you are willfully difficult to get along with, and I accept that. I'm sure you have your reasons.

1 edit

@Arkturos said
"You guys?" Which homogeneous group do you believe I belong to, I wonder.
I have no idea, and such status is irrelevant on the Forum. And Suzianne, who apprised me months ago, will tell you that guys can refer equaly to girls as to boys. oops, eqiually.
If it Were relevant, we would wonder which of the two sexes phranny is.


@AverageJoe1 said
I have no idea, and such status is irrelevant on the Forum. And Suzianne, who apprised me months ago, will tell you that guys can refer equaly to girls as to boys. oops, eqiually.
If it Were relevant, we would wonder which of the two sexes phranny is.
Now it's your turn, Joe.

Overall and all things considered, you come across as a false and complacent stirrer, a self-amuser who doesn't really care about anyone else's troubles.

Please explain yourself and where you come from.


@Arkturos said
Now it's your turn, Joe.

Overall and all things considered, you come across as a false and complacent stirrer, a self-amuser who doesn't really care about anyone else's troubles.

Please explain yourself and where you come from.
Good luck, he will go HUH?