2 edits
@metal-brain saidIts not impossible to know. We just did it with dead people. Now we know. If there was any evidence that it was common enough to tip an election, there would be more than 10 people on that list. Very large and comprehensive studies have been done on this showing that the percentage of dead voters is very small (0.0003% of votes if I remember). Even if these voter fraud studies were missing 99 out of 100 cases, this is still not even close to enough to tip an election.
You claim to know how much voter fraud there is?
Are you psychic?
I would never be stupid enough to claim I knew how much election fraud there is. It is obvious that is impossible to know.
Are you the poster boy for democrat logic?
It is statistically impossible that this election was decided by fraudulent votes from dead people.
@metal-brain saidJust to be sure that we talk about the same thing:
You claim to know how much voter fraud there is?
Are you psychic?
I would never be stupid enough to claim I knew how much election fraud there is. It is obvious that is impossible to know.
Are you the poster boy for democrat logic?
You claim: There has never been a presidential election in the USA without fraud (since it has not been proven beyond doubt that no fraud has happened).
Right or not?
@wildgrass saidI didn't claim there was enough to tip the election. I would have to know how much voter fraud there is to know that and that is impossible to know.
Its not impossible to know. We just did it with dead people. Now we know. If there was any evidence that it was common enough to tip an election, there would be more than 10 people on that list. Very large and comprehensive studies have been done on this showing that the percentage of dead voters is very small (0.0003% of votes if I remember). Even if these voter fraud stud ...[text shortened]...
It is statistically impossible that this election was decided by fraudulent votes from dead people.
You claim to know how much voter fraud there is?
Are you psychic?
I would never be stupid enough to claim I knew how much election fraud there is. It is obvious that is impossible to know.
Are you the poster boy for democrat logic?
@ponderable saidThere has never been a presidential election in the USA without fraud. Enough people were caught that I can prove that.
Just to be sure that we talk about the same thing:
You claim: There has never been a presidential election in the USA without fraud (since it has not been proven beyond doubt that no fraud has happened).
Right or not?
My claim: Nobody knows how much voter fraud there is. It is impossible to know. We only know how much voter fraud is caught and on the record. Anybody who claims to know different is a liar.
@metal-brain saidSo I understand correctly that you accept the election result as stated by the officials is to be accepted by the Population?
There has never been a presidential election in the USA without fraud. Enough people were caught that I can prove that.
My claim: Nobody knows how much voter fraud there is. It is impossible to know. We only know how much voter fraud is caught and on the record. Anybody who claims to know different is a liar.
@ponderable saidThe population decides that, not me.
So I understand correctly that you accept the election result as stated by the officials is to be accepted by the Population?
I don't tell the population what to accept.
Do you think they would listen?
@metal-brain saidMaybe it's 0.0003% or maybe it's 0.001% but it's not 0.5%. It's statistically impossible. You can make reasonable approximations and be happy that we have a representative government.
I didn't claim there was enough to tip the election. I would have to know how much voter fraud there is to know that and that is impossible to know.
You claim to know how much voter fraud there is?
Are you psychic?
I would never be stupid enough to claim I knew how much election fraud there is. It is obvious that is impossible to know.
Are you the poster boy for democrat logic?
@wildgrass said0.5% is not statistically impossible. You are full of crap!
Maybe it's 0.0003% or maybe it's 0.001% but it's not 0.5%. It's statistically impossible. You can make reasonable approximations and be happy that we have a representative government.
@metal-brain saidWe only found 10. Explain to me how 800,000 dead people can vote.
0.5% is not statistically impossible. You are full of crap!
As far as I know, all large cohort studies who have looked find handfuls of suspect voters at best.
@metal-brain saidYou could just as easily be talking about spoilt ballots from in-person voting.
0.5% is not statistically impossible. You are full of crap!
@wildgrass said800,000 is 0.5%? LOL!
We only found 10. Explain to me how 800,000 dead people can vote.
As far as I know, all large cohort studies who have looked find handfuls of suspect voters at best.
Now you are lying about the math!
😵
@metal-brain saidFine make it 0.1%. Explain how we turn 10 into a much larger number.
800,000 is 0.5%? LOL!
Now you are lying about the math!
😵
@wildgrass saidVote buying for one. Mail in voting makes vote buying easy to get away with. All it takes is a signature from a registered voter.
Fine make it 0.1%. Explain how we turn 10 into a much larger number.